Cited by 124Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAging and Gerontology ResearchAging, Health, and Disability

Association of daily intellectual activities with lower risk of incident dementia among older Chinese adults

Open access
Lee, Allen T. C., Richards, Marcus, Chan, Wai C., Chiu, Helen F. K., Lee, Ruby S. Y., Lam, Linda C. W.·2018·JAMA Psychiatry

Abstract

Importance: Associations between late-life participation in intellectual activities and decreased odds of developing dementia have been reported. However, reverse causality and confounding effects due to other health behaviors or problems have not been adequately addressed. Objective: To examine whether late-life participation in intellectual activities is associated with a lower risk of incident dementia years later, independent of other lifestyle and health-related factors. Design, Setting, and Participants: A longitudinal observational study was conducted at all Elderly Health Centres of the Department of Health of the Government of Hong Kong among 15 582 community-living Chinese individuals age 65 years or older at baseline who were free of dementia, with baseline evaluations performed January 1 to June 30, 2005, and follow-up assessments performed from January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2012. Statistical analysis was performed from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2016. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was incident dementia as diagnosed by geriatric psychiatrists in accordance with the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision, or a Clinical Dementia Rating of 1 to 3. At baseline and follow-up interviews, self-reported information on participation in intellectual activities within 1 month before assessment was collected. Examples of intellectual activities, which were described by a local validated classification system, were reading books, newspapers, or magazines; playing board games, Mahjong, or card games; and betting on horse racing. Other important variables including demographics (age, sex, and educational level), physical and psychiatric comorbidities (cardiovascular risks, depression, visual and hearing impairments, and poor mobility), and lifestyle factors (physical exercise, adequate fruit and vegetable intake, smoking, and recreational and social activities) were also assessed. Results: Of the 15 582 individuals in the study, 9950 (63.9%) were women, and the median age at baseline was 74 years (interquartile range, 71-77 years). A total of 1349 individuals (8.7%) developed dementia during a median follow-up period of 5.0 years. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that the estimated odds ratio for incident dementia was 0.71 (95% CI, 0.60-0.84; P < .001) for those with intellectual activities at baseline, after excluding those who developed dementia within 3 years after baseline and adjusting for health behaviors, physical and psychiatric comorbidities, and sociodemographic factors. Conclusions and Relevance: Active participation in intellectual activities, even in late life, might help delay or prevent dementia in older adults.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.0657

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a large study in China, people older than 65 years who read, played games, or bet more frequently had reduced dementia risk (n=15,882, OR=0.7, 95% CI 0.6-0.8).

    “It found people older than 65 years who read, played games, or bet more frequently had reduced risk of dementia (n=15 882, odds ratio [OR]=0·7, 95% CI 0·6–0·8).”

    From Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the Lancet Commission (2020) · cites this paper as [40]

    The Abstract reports that intellectual activities, including reading, games and betting on horse racing, were associated with lower incident dementia odds (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.60–0.84), consistent with the rounded figures cited. But the Key Points and Incidence of Dementia sections give a sample of 15,582, not 15,882; the reported OR is for participation in intellectual activities, not specifically for doing them more frequently. (LLM, conf=0.91)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • It is difficult to separate the specific impact of education from overall cognitive ability, and the specific impact of later-life cognitive activity from lifelong cognitive function and activity.

    “It is difficult to separate out the specific impact of education from the effect of overall cognitive ability,38, 39 and the specific impact of later-life cognitive activity from lifelong cognitive function and activity.39, 40”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, A. T. C., Richards, M., Chan, W. C., Chiu, H. F. K., Lee, R. S. Y., & Lam, L. C. W.
Affiliations
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing (GB)
  • University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Department of Health (CN)
Corresponding author
Lam, Linda C. W.
Venue
JAMA Psychiatry
Published
2018-07-01
Volume
75
Issue
7
Pages
697
ISSN
2168-622X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2805179967
Cited by
124
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 3
FWCI
8.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
Keywords
intellectual activity, dementia risk, incident dementia, older adults, reading, board games, mahjong, reverse causality, confounding, Chinese older adults, Hong Kong, lifestyle factors, physical activity, fruit and vegetable intake, smoking, social activity, cognitive reserve, dementia prevention, hearing and visual impairment, mobility, cardiovascular risk
MeSH terms
Games, Recreational, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, China, Dementia, Diet, Female, Gambling, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Reading, Risk, Exercise, Incidence, Multivariate Analysis, Logistic Models, Social Participation, Protective Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review