Cited by 180Cognitive Abilities and TestingDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAging and Gerontology Research

Influence of young adult cognitive ability and additional education on later-life cognition

Open access
Kremen, William S., Beck, Asad, Elman, Jeremy A., Gustavson, Daniel E., Reynolds, Chandra A., Tu, Xin M., Sanderson-Cimino, Mark E., Panizzon, Matthew S. +8 more·2019·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

How and when education improves cognitive capacity is an issue of profound societal importance. Education and later-life education-related factors, such as occupational complexity and engagement in cognitive-intellectual activities, are frequently considered indices of cognitive reserve, but whether their effects are truly causal remains unclear. In this study, after accounting for general cognitive ability (GCA) at an average age of 20 y, additional education, occupational complexity, or engagement in cognitive-intellectual activities accounted for little variance in late midlife cognitive functioning in men age 56–66 ( n = 1009). Age 20 GCA accounted for 40% of variance in the same measure in late midlife and approximately 10% of variance in each of seven cognitive domains. The other factors each accounted for <1% of the variance in cognitive outcomes. The impact of these other factors likely reflects reverse causation—namely, downstream effects of early adult GCA. Supporting that idea, age 20 GCA, but not education, was associated with late midlife cortical surface area ( n = 367). In our view, the most parsimonious explanation of our results, a meta-analysis of the impact of education, and epidemiologic studies of the Flynn effect is that intellectual capacity gains due to education plateau in late adolescence/early adulthood. Longitudinal studies with multiple cognitive assessments before completion of education would be needed to confirm this speculation. If cognitive gains reach an asymptote by early adulthood, then strengthening cognitive reserve and reducing later-life cognitive decline and dementia risk may really begin with improving educational quality and access in childhood and adolescence.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1811537116

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • New work suggests overall cognitive ability increases with education before reaching a plateau in late adolescence, when the brain reaches greatest plasticity, with relatively few further gains from education after age 20 years.

    “New work suggests overall cognitive ability increases, with education, before reaching a plateau in late adolescence, when brain reaches greatest plasticity; with relatively few further gains with education after age 20 years.38”

    From Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the Lancet Commission (2020) · cites this paper as [38]

    The Abstract suggests that education-related gains in cognitive ability plateau in late adolescence or early adulthood, and the Discussion reports little additional effect of education after age 20. The Discussion describes substantial brain development during childhood and adolescence, but does not say that brain plasticity is greatest in late adolescence. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • It is difficult to separate the specific impact of education from overall cognitive ability, and the specific impact of later-life cognitive activity from lifelong cognitive function and activity.

    “It is difficult to separate out the specific impact of education from the effect of overall cognitive ability,38, 39 and the specific impact of later-life cognitive activity from lifelong cognitive function and activity.39, 40”
  • This suggests cognitive stimulation is more important in early life, and much of the apparent later effect might be due to people of higher cognitive function seeking out cognitively stimulating activities and education.

    “This suggests cognitive stimulation is more important in early life; much of the apparent later effect might be due to people of higher cognitive function seeking out cognitively stimulating activities and education.38”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kremen, W. S., Beck, A., Elman, J. A., Gustavson, D. E., Reynolds, C. A., Tu, X. M., Sanderson-Cimino, M. E., Panizzon, M. S., Vuoksimaa, E., Toomey, R., Fennema-Notestine, C., Hagler, D. J., Fang, B., Dale, A. M., Lyons, M. J., & Franz, C. E.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • San Diego State University (US)
  • University of California, Riverside (US)
  • Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093;
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • Boston University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2019-01-22
Volume
116
Issue
6
Pages
2021-2026
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2913301193
Cited by
180
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 2
FWCI
23.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • HHS | NIH | National Institute on Aging (AG050595, AG022381, AG022982, AG046413, AG047903, AG059329)
  • Academy of Finland | Biotieteiden ja Ympäristön Tutkimuksen Toimikunta (314639)
  • Vainio Foundation (No number)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
general intelligence, additional education, cognitive reserve, later-life cognition, occupational complexity, reverse causality, cortical surface area, Flynn effect, cognitive decline, dementia risk, educational quality
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Aged, Cognition, Cognition Disorders, Dementia, Education, Humans, Life Style, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Young Adult, Cognitive Reserve, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review