The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Distribution of mRNAs encoding CRF receptors in brain and pituitary of rat and mouse
Abstract
Two G protein-coupled receptors have been identified that bind corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) and urocortin (UCN) with high affinity. Hybridization histochemical methods were used to shed light on controversies concerning their localization in rat brain, and to provide normative distributional data in mouse, the standard model for genetic manipulation in mammals. The distribution of CRF-R1 mRNA in mouse was found to be fundamentally similar to that in rat, with expression predominating in the cerebral cortex, sensory relay nuclei, and in the cerebellum and its major afferents. Pronounced species differences in distribution were few, although more subtle variations in the relative strength of R1 expression were seen in several forebrain regions. CRF-R2 mRNA displayed comparable expression in rat and mouse brain, distinct from, and more restricted than that of CRF-R1. Major neuronal sites of CRF-R2 expression included aspects of the olfactory bulb, lateral septal nucleus, bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, ventromedial hypothalamic nucleus, medial and posterior cortical nuclei of the amygdala, ventral hippocampus, mesencephalic raphe nuclei, and novel localizations in the nucleus of the solitary tract and area postrema. Several sites of expression in the limbic forebrain were found to overlap partially with ones of androgen receptor expression. In pituitary, rat and mouse displayed CRF-R1 mRNA signal continuously over the intermediate lobe and over a subset of cells in the anterior lobe, whereas CRF-R2 transcripts were expressed mainly in the posterior lobe. The distinctive expression pattern of CRF-R2 mRNA identifies additional putative central sites of action for CRF and/or UCN. Constitutive expression of CRF-R2 mRNA in the nucleus of the solitary tract, and stress-inducible expression of CRF-R1 transcripts in the paraventricular nucleus may provide a basis for understanding documented effects of CRF-related peptides at a loci shown previously to lack a capacity for CRF-R expression or CRF binding. Other such "mismatches" remain to be reconciled.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“CRF receptor protein and mRNA are abundant in the BNST—much more so than in the CeA (Ju et al, 1989; Potter et al, 1994; Van Pett et al, 2000; Wynn et al, 1984).”
From Phasic vs Sustained Fear in Rats and Humans: Role of the Extended Amygdala in Fear vs Anxiety (2010) · cites this paper as Van Pett et al, 2000
In the citing paper
“CRF-R2 also displays distinct and restricted expression, being expressed in the MeA, the BNST, the ventromedial hypothalamic nucleus (VMH), the lateral septum (LS) and the dorsal raphe 9 .”
From Ucn3 and CRF-R2 in the medial amygdala regulate complex social dynamics (2016) · cites this paper as [9]
Citations
Cites
The cholinergic hypothesis of geriatric memory dysfunction
Bartus, R. T., Dean, R. L., Beer, B., & Lippa, A. S. (1982) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7046051 · Cited by 5,545
Running increases cell proliferation and neurogenesis in the adult mouse dentate gyrus
van Praag, H., Kempermann, G., & Gage, F. H. (1999) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/6368 · Cited by 3,880
West, M. J., Slomianka, L., & Gundersen, H. J. G. (1991) · The Anatomical Record · doi:10.1002/ar.1092310411 · Cited by 2,994
Hypothalamic integration: organization of the paraventricular and supraoptic nuclei
Swanson, L. W., & Sawchenko, P. E. (1983) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.06.030183.001413 · Cited by 1,991
Self-citationSwanson, L. W., Sawchenko, P. E., Rivier, J., & Vale, W. W. (2008) · Neuroendocrinology · doi:10.1159/000123454 · Cited by 1,953
Self-citationNucleus locus ceruleus: new evidence of anatomical and physiological specificity
Foote, S. L., Bloom, F. E., & Aston-Jones, G. (1983) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.1983.63.3.844 · Cited by 1,901
Maunsell, J., & van Essen, D. (1983) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.03-12-02563.1983 · Cited by 1,602
Microglia-specific localisation of a novel calcium binding protein, Iba1
Ito, D., Imai, Y., Ohsawa, K., Nakajima, K., Fukuuchi, Y., & Kohsaka, S. (1998) · Molecular Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0169-328x(98)00040-0 · Cited by 1,476
The efficiency of systematic sampling in stereology—reconsidered
GUNDERSEN, H. J. G., JENSEN, E. B. V., KIÊU, K., & NIELSEN, J. (1999) · Journal of Microscopy · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2818.1999.00457.x · Cited by 1,317
Exercise and brain neurotrophins
Neeper, S. A., Góauctemez-Pinilla, F., Choi, J., & Cotman, C. (1995) · Nature · doi:10.1038/373109a0 · Cited by 1,066
Cited by
The role of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in neuroendocrine responses to stress
Smith, S. M., & Vale, W. W. (2006) · Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience · doi:10.31887/dcns.2006.8.4/ssmith · Cited by 1,948
Self-citationJoëls, M., & Baram, T. Z. (2009) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2632 · Cited by 1,521
Phasic vs Sustained Fear in Rats and Humans: Role of the Extended Amygdala in Fear vs Anxiety
Davis, M., Walker, D. L., Miles, L., & Grillon, C. (2010) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2009.109 · Cited by 1,513
Lewis, K., Li, C., Perrin, M. H., Blount, A., Kunitake, K., Donaldson, C., Vaughan, J., Reyes, T. M., Gulyas, J., Fischer, W., et al. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.121165198 · Cited by 925
Self-citationNeuroendocrine pharmacology of stress
Carrasco, G. A., & Van de Kar, L. D. (2003) · European Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/s0014-2999(03)01285-8 · Cited by 914
Metadata
- Authors
- Van Pett, K., Viau, V., Bittencourt, J. C., Chan, R. K. W., Li, H.-Y., Arias, C., Prins, G. S., Perrin, M., Vale, W., & Sawchenko, P. E.
- Venue
- The Journal of Comparative Neurology
- Published
- 2000
- References
- 26
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Distribution of mRNAs encoding CRF receptors in brain and pituitary of rat and mouse. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/1096-9861(20001211)428:2
- The paper
- Van Pett, K., Viau, V., Bittencourt, J. C., Chan, R. K. W., Li, H.-Y., Arias, C., Prins, G. S., Perrin, M., Vale, W., & Sawchenko, P. E. (2000). Distribution of mRNAs encoding CRF receptors in brain and pituitary of rat and mouse. The Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/1096-9861(20001211)428%3A2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.