Cited by 131Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesTreatment of Major DepressionMental Health Treatment and Access

Antidepressants for the treatment of people with co-occurring depression and alcohol dependence

Open access
Agabio, Roberta, Trogu, Emanuela, Pani, Pier Paolo·2018·Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Alcohol dependence is a major public health problem characterized by recidivism, and medical and psychosocial complications. The co-occurrence of major depression in people entering treatment for alcohol dependence is common, and represents a risk factor for morbidity and mortality, which negatively influences treatment outcomes. OBJECTIVES: To assess the benefits and risks of antidepressants for the treatment of people with co-occurring depression and alcohol dependence. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Drugs and Alcohol Group Specialised Register (via CRSLive), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, and Embase from inception to July 2017. We also searched for ongoing and unpublished studies via ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov) and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (apps.who.int/trialsearch/).All searches included non-English language literature. We handsearched references of topic-related systematic reviews and the included studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials and controlled clinical trials comparing antidepressants alone or in association with other drugs or psychosocial interventions (or both) versus placebo, no treatment, and other pharmacological or psychosocial interventions. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methodological procedures as expected by Cochrane. MAIN RESULTS: We included 33 studies in the review (2242 participants). Antidepressants were compared to placebo (22 studies), psychotherapy (two studies), other medications (four studies), or other antidepressants (five studies). The mean duration of the trials was 9.9 weeks (range 3 to 26 weeks). Eighteen studies took place in the USA, 12 in Europe, two in Turkey, and one in Australia. The antidepressant included in most of the trials was sertraline; other medications were amitriptyline, citalopram, desipramine, doxepin, escitalopram, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, imipramine, mianserin, mirtazepine, nefazodone, paroxetine, tianeptine, venlafaxine, and viloxazine. Eighteen studies were conducted in an outpatient setting, nine in an inpatient setting, and six in both settings. Psychosocial treatment was provided in 18 studies. There was high heterogeneity in the selection of outcomes and the rating systems used for diagnosis and outcome assessment.Comparing antidepressants to placebo, low-quality evidence suggested that antidepressants reduced the severity of depression evaluated with interviewer-rated scales at the end of trial (14 studies, 1074 participants, standardized mean difference (SMD) -0.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.49 to -0.04). However, the difference became non-significant after the exclusion of studies with a high risk of bias (SMD -0.17, 95% CI -0.39 to 0.04). In addition, very low-quality evidence supported the efficacy of antidepressants in increasing the response to the treatment (10 studies, 805 participants, risk ratio (RR) 1.40, 95% Cl 1.08 to 1.82). This result became non-significant after the exclusion of studies at high risk of bias (RR 1.27, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.68). There was no difference for other relevant outcomes such as the difference between baseline and final score, evaluated using interviewer-rated scales (5 studies, 447 participants, SMD 0.15, 95% CI -0.12 to 0.42).Moderate-quality evidence found that antidepressants increased the number of participants abstinent from alcohol during the trial (7 studies, 424 participants, RR 1.71, 95% Cl 1.22 to 2.39) and reduced the number of drinks per drinking days (7 studies, 451 participants, mean difference (MD) -1.13 drinks per drinking days, 95% Cl -1.79 to -0.46). After the exclusion of studies with high risk of bias, the number of abstinent remained higher (RR 1.69, 95% CI 1.18 to 2.43) and the number of drinks per drinking days lower (MD -1.21 number of drinks per drinking days, 95% CI -1.91 to -0.51) among participants who received antidepressants compared to those who received placebo. However, other outcomes such as the rate of abstinent days did not differ between antidepressants and placebo (9 studies, 821 participants, MD 1.34, 95% Cl -1.66 to 4.34; low-quality evidence).Low-quality evidence suggested no differences between antidepressants and placebo in the number of dropouts (17 studies, 1159 participants, RR 0.98, 95% Cl 0.79 to 1.22) and adverse events as withdrawal for medical reasons (10 studies, 947 participants, RR 1.15, 95% Cl 0.65 to 2.04).There were few studies comparing one antidepressant versus another antidepressant or antidepressants versus other interventions, and these had a small sample size and were heterogeneous in terms of the types of interventions that were compared, yielding results that were not informative. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We found low-quality evidence supporting the clinical use of antidepressants in the treatment of people with co-occurring depression and alcohol dependence. Antide

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/14651858.cd008581.pub2

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cochrane reviews have highlighted the potential utility of SSRIs in treating MDD, anxiety disorders, AUD, or combinations of these conditions in individuals with co-occurring AUD, with minimal risk of adverse effects.

    “Cochrane reviews have highlighted the potential utility of SSRIs in treating MDD, anxiety disorders, AUD, or combinations of these conditions in individuals with co-occurring AUD, with minimal risk of adverse effects [63,64].”

    From Navigating the Complex Intersection of Substance Use and Psychiatric Disorders: A Comprehensive Review (2024) · cites this paper as [63]

    The Authors’ Conclusions (page unavailable) say antidepressants may help depression, alcohol dependence, or both in people with these co-occurring conditions, and that adverse-effect risk appears minimal, especially for SSRIs. The review does not establish utility for anxiety disorders; its Results (Primary outcome: response to antidepressive treatment, page unavailable) found no difference between SSRIs and placebo in depression response. The claim therefore extends findings about antidepressants generally to SSRIs and adds an unsupported anxiety indication. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. Liappas 2005 arm A {published data only} Liappas J, Paparrigopoulos T, Tzavellas E, Rabavilas A. Mirtazapine and venlafaxine in the management of collateral psychopathology during alcohol detoxification. Progress in Neuro-psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry 2005;29(1):55-60.
  2. Liappas 2005 arm B {published data only} Liappas J, Paparrigopoulos T, Tzavellas E, Rabavilas A. Mirtazapine and venlafaxine in the management of collateral psychopathology during alcohol detoxification. Progress in Neuro-psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry 2005;29(1):55-60.
  3. Liappas 2005 arm C {published data only} Liappas J, Paparrigopoulos T, Tzavellas E, Rabavilas A. Mirtazapine and venlafaxine in the management of collateral psychopathology during alcohol detoxification. Progress in Neuro-psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry 2005;29(1):55-60.
  4. Lôo 1988 {published data only} Lôo H, Malka R, Defrance R, Barrucand D, Benard JY, Niox- Rivière H, et al. Tianeptine and amitriptyline. Controlled double-blind trial in depressed alcoholic patients. Neuropsychobiology 1988;19(2):79-85.
  5. Mason 1996 {published data only} Mason BJ, Kocsis JH. Desipramine treatment of alcoholism. Psychopharmacology Bulletin 1991;27(2):155-61.
  6. Artigas F, Nutt DJ, Shelton R. Mechanism of action of antidepressants. Psychopharmacology Bulletin 2002;36(Suppl 2):123-32.
  7. Babor TF, Hofmann M, DelBoca FK, Hesselbrock V, Meyer RE, Dolinsky ZS, et al. Types of alcoholics, I. Evidence for an empirically derived typology based on indicators of vulnerability and severity. Archives of General Psychiatry 1992;49:599-608.
  8. Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, Mock J, Erbaugh J. An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry 1961;4:561-71.
  9. Beck AT, Epstein N, Brown G, Steer RA. An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: psychometric properties. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1988;56:893-7.
  10. Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK. Beck Depression Inventory: Manual. 2nd Edition. San Antonio (TX): Harcourt Brace, 1996.
  11. Brown SA, Inaba RK, Gillin JC, Schuckit MA, Stewart MA, Irwin MR. Alcoholism and affective disorder: clinical course of depressive symptoms. American Journal of Psychiatry 1995;152:45-52.
  12. Busner J, Targum SD, Miller DS. The Clinical Global Impressions scale: errors in understanding and use. Comprehensive Psychiatry 2009;50(3):257-62.
  13. Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. The Pittsburgh Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Research 1989;28:193-213.
  14. Carboni E, Silvagni A. Dopamine reuptake by norepinephrine neurons: exception or rule?. Critical Reviews in Neurobiology 2004;16(1-2):121-8.
  15. Carr AC, Ancill RJ, Ghosh A, Margo A. Direct assessment of depression by microcomputer. A feasibility study. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 1981;64(5):415-22.
  16. Chick 2004a Chick J, Aschauer H, Hornik K. Efficacy of fluvoxamine in preventing relapse in alcohol dependence: a one-year, double blind, placebo-controlled Multicentre study with analysis by typology. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2004;74:61-70.
  17. Cloninger CR, Sigvardsson S, Gilligan SB, von Knorring AL, Reich T, Bohman M. Genetic heterogeneity and the classification of alcoholism. Advances in Alcohol and Substance Abuse 1988;7:3-16.
  18. Foulds JA, Adamson SJ, Boden JM, Williman JA, Mulder RT. Depression in patients with alcohol use disorders: systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes for independent and substance-induced disorders. Journal of Affective Disorders 2015;185:47-59.
  19. Goldman HH, Skodol AE, Lave TR. Revising axis V for DSM-IV: a review of measures of social functioning. American Journal of Psychiatry 1992;149(9):1148-56.
  20. GRADE 2004 The GRADE working group. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2004;328:1490-4.
  21. Grant BF, Harford TC. Comorbidity between DSM-IV alcohol use disorders and major depression: results of a national survey. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 1995;39:197-206.
  22. Hamilton M. The assessment of anxiety states by rating. British Journal of Medical Psychology 1959;32:50-5.
  23. Hamilton M. Development of a rating scale for primary depressive illness. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 1967;6:278-96.
  24. Hamilton M. Diagnosis and rating of anxiety. British Journal of Psychiatry 1969;Special publication:76-9.
  25. Hasin DS, Goodwin RD, Stinson FS, Grant BF. Epidemiology of major depressive disorder: results from the national epidemiologic survey on alcoholism and related conditions. Archives of General Psychiatry 2005;62(10):1097-106.
  26. Iovieno N, Tedeschini E, Bentley KH, Evins AE, Papakostas GI. Antidepressants for major depressive disorder and dysthymic disorder in patients with comorbid alcohol use disorders: a meta-analysis of placebo-controlled randomized trials. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 2011;72(8):1144-51.
  27. Rockliff BW. A brief rating scale for antidepressant drug trials. Comprehensive Psychiatry 1971;12(2):122-35.
  28. Saunders 1993
  29. Schneider B. Substance use disorders and risk for completed suicide. Archives of Suicide Research 2009;13:303-16.
  30. Schuckit MA, Tipp JE, Bergman M, Reich W, Hesselbrock VM, Smith TL. Comparison of induced and independent major depressive disorders in 2,945 alcoholics. American Journal of Psychiatry 1997;154:948-57.
  31. Scott J, Huskisson EC. Graphic representation of pain. Pain 1976;2:175-84.
  32. Selzer M. The Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test (MAST): the quest for a new diagnostic instrument. American Journal of Psychiatry 1971;127:1653-8.
  33. Sheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan KH, Amorim P, Janavs J, Weiller E, et al. The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 1998;59(Suppl 20):22-33.
  34. Shelton J, Hollister LE, Gocka EF. The drinking behavior interview (an attempt to quantify alcoholic impairment). Diseases of the Nervous System 1969;30(7):464-7.
  35. Sher L, Oquendo MA, Galfalvy HC, Grunebaum MF, Burke AK, Zalsman G, et al. The relationship of aggression to suicidal behavior in depressed patients with a history of alcoholism. Addictive behaviours 2005;30:1144-53.
  36. Shirayama Y, Chaki S. Neurochemistry of the nucleus accumbens and its relevance to depression and antidepressant action in rodents. Current Neuropharmacology 2006;4(4):277-91.
  37. Skinner HA, Allen BA. Alcohol dependence syndrome: measurement and validation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1982;91:199-209.
  38. Spitzer RL, Williams BW, Gibbon M, First MB. The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID). I: History, rationale, and description. Archives of General Psychiatry 1992;49:624-9.
  39. Stahl SM, Grady MM. Differences in mechanism of action between current and future antidepressants. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 2003;64(Suppl 13):13-7.
  40. Torrens M, Fonseca F, Mateu G, Farré M. Efficacy of antidepressants in substance use disorders with and without comorbid depression. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2005;78(1):1-22.
  41. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item Short Form Health Survey I: conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care 1992;30:473-83.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Agabio, R., Trogu, E., & Pani, P. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Cagliari (IT)
  • Cagliari Public Health Trust; Department of Psychiatry; ASL Cagliari Cagliari Sardinia Italy 09128
  • Sardinia Protection Health Trust; Sassari Social-Health Area; Sassari Sardinia Italy
Venue
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-04-24
Volume
2018
Issue
4
Pages
CD008581-CD008581
ISSN
  • 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-1858
OpenAlex
W2801922112
Cited by
131
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 6 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UNICA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Cagliari) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
antidepressants, major depressive disorder, alcoholism, sertraline, antidepressant efficacy, antidepressant safety, adverse effects, relapse, treatment outcomes, psychosocial interventions, relapse prevention, relapse severity, medication adherence
MeSH terms
Adult, Alcohol Drinking, Alcoholism, Antidepressive Agents, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Placebos, Psychotherapy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Diagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry), Alcohol Abstinence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review