Cited by 318Cancer survivorship and careChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of LifeCancer-related cognitive impairment studies

Management of Anxiety and Depression in Adult Survivors of Cancer: ASCO Guideline Update

Open access
Andersen, Barbara L., Lacchetti, Christina, Ashing, Kimlin, Berek, Jonathan S., Berman, Barry S., Bolte, Sage, Dizon, Don S., Given, Barbara +4 more·2023·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSETo update the American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline on the management of anxiety and depression in adult cancer survivors.METHODSA multidisciplinary expert panel convened to update the guideline. A systematic review of evidence published from 2013-2021 was conducted.RESULTSThe evidence base consisted of 17 systematic reviews ± meta analyses (nine for psychosocial interventions, four for physical exercise, three for mindfulness-based stress reduction [MBSR], and one for pharmacologic interventions), and an additional 44 randomized controlled trials. Psychological, educational, and psychosocial interventions led to improvements in depression and anxiety. Evidence for pharmacologic management of depression and anxiety in cancer survivors was inconsistent. The lack of inclusion of survivors from minoritized groups was noted and identified as an important consideration to provide high-quality care for ethnic minority populations.RECOMMENDATIONSIt is recommended to use a stepped-care model, that is, provide the most effective and least resource-intensive intervention based on symptom severity. All oncology patients should be offered education regarding depression and anxiety. For patients with moderate symptoms of depression, clinicians should offer cognitive behavior therapy (CBT), behavioral activation (BA), MBSR, structured physical activity, or empirically supported psychosocial interventions. For patients with moderate symptoms of anxiety, clinicians should offer CBT, BA, structured physical activity, acceptance and commitment therapy, or psychosocial interventions. For patients with severe symptoms of depression or anxiety, clinicians should offer cognitive therapy, BA, CBT, MBSR, or interpersonal therapy. Treating clinicians may offer a pharmacologic regimen for depression or anxiety for patients who do not have access to first-line treatment, prefer pharmacotherapy, have previously responded well to pharmacotherapy, or have not improved following first-line psychological or behavioral management.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/survivorship-guidelines. © American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.23.00293

Cites

171 of 171 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

60 of 157 cited sources checked · 16 supported · 3 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Findingcitation

    Neither of these trials included participants above a threshold for depressive symptoms.

    “However, neither of these trials included participants above a threshold for depressive symptoms.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [103] source

      The Methods (Measures; page unavailable) define a depression-score threshold of >1.0. The Methods (Procedure) say participants with impaired depression scores were included and randomized, and the Results report outcomes for participants with impaired depression scores at baseline. Thus, the claim is contrary to what this cited trial reports; this paper does not establish anything about the other trial. (LLM, conf=0.91)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [72] source
  • Premisecitation

    The risk for self-harm and/or suicide is 85% higher (SMR 1.85; 95% CI, 1.55 to 2.20) in cancer patients than in the general population.

    “The risk for self-harm and/or suicide has been reported to be 85% higher (standardized mortality ratio, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.55 to 2.20) than for the general population, 39 with the greatest risk during the first 12 months after cancer diagnosis, 40,41 underscoring the importance of screening for the newly diagnosed.42,43”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [39] source

      The Results (p. 2) report an 85% higher suicide mortality rate among patients with cancer than in the general population, with the stated SMR and confidence interval. The paper's estimate concerns deaths by suicide, not the broader outcome of self-harm and/or suicide. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Elevated anxiety possibly predicts cancer recurrence.

    “Elevated anxiety predicts nonadherence to recommended therapies, [23][24][25] higher use and costs of medical care, [26][27][28] and possibly cancer recurrence.29”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [29] source

      The Discussion says anxiety can predict recurrence, and the results report a pooled hazard ratio of 1.17 (95% CI 1.02–1.34). The evidence is limited to patients with breast cancer; the citing sentence does not specify that population. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    The greatest risk for self-harm and/or suicide is during the first 12 months after cancer diagnosis.

    “The risk for self-harm and/or suicide has been reported to be 85% higher (standardized mortality ratio, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.55 to 2.20) than for the general population, 39 with the greatest risk during the first 12 months after cancer diagnosis, 40,41 underscoring the importance of screening for the newly diagnosed.42,43”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [40] source

      The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that another study found significantly higher suicide risk within the first year after cancer diagnosis. But this paper’s finding that self-harm risk was highest within 12 months is measured from mental-health diagnosis, not cancer diagnosis. It therefore does not establish that the combined risk of self-harm and/or suicide is greatest in the first 12 months after cancer diagnosis. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [41] source

      The Results section identifies the first 6 months after cancer diagnosis—not the first 12 months—as the period with the greatest suicide risk. The paper's findings concern suicide; its discussion mentions self-harm events but does not establish when self-harm risk is greatest. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Depression at diagnosis and throughout the cancer trajectory covaries with impaired immunity.

    “Depression at diagnosis and throughout the cancer trajectory 16 covaries with lower adherence to treatment and follow-up care, increased inflammation, impaired immunity, and reduced survival.17,18”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [16] source

      The Discussion describes prior breast-cancer research that tracked depressive symptoms and measures of immunity from diagnosis over five years. It does not say that depression covaried with impaired immunity, and this paper's own analysis examined depressive-symptom trajectories and survival rather than immune function. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [17] source
    • cites [18] source

      The Discussion (page unavailable) names immunological activity as a possible common factor in depression and worse cancer survival. It does not report that depression covaries with impaired immunity, and its limitations state that the time-course of depression was unavailable, so it cannot support the claim about the entire cancer trajectory. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims. 75
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 59
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Some studies with null effects were of lower methodological quality and/or potentially hampered by using an enhanced TAU control rather than a TAU control.

    “Some studies with null effects were of lower methodological quality 103,105 and/or potentially hampered by using an enhanced TAU control rather than a TAU control.69,98”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [103] source

      The Results (Primary Outcome Analysis; page unavailable) report no difference between arms on the aggregated outcome, supporting the reference to a null effect. But Methods (Procedure; page unavailable) describes the control as receiving delayed INSPIRE access after the six-month assessment, not as an enhanced treatment-as-usual control; the paper does not suggest that such a control hampered the results. The lower-methodological-quality clause is attached to different citations. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [105] source
    • cites [69] source
    • cites [98] source

      The citation to this trial is attached to the claim that a null effect may have been hampered by an enhanced TAU control. The Method (p. 1) and Discussion (p. 5) describe the comparison as CBT plus TAU versus TAU alone. The Limitations (p. 7) acknowledge that TAU could not be standardised, but say very few control participants reported any psychological intervention and none reported CBT; the paper does not describe an enhanced TAU control. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The López-López analyses document robust positive effects for both CBT and internet-delivered CBT, in studies using face-to-face, hybrid, or multimedia formats, in contrast to increased levels of depression found in waitlist control participants.

    “Moreover, the L ópez-L ópez 54 analyses document robust positive effects for both CBT and internet-delivered CBT, in studies using face-to-face, hybrid, or multimedia formats, in contrast to increased levels of depression found in waitlist control participants.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [54] source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 1 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Depressive symptoms are elevated for those with advanced disease stage and/or significant symptom burden.

    “Depressive symptoms are elevated for those with advanced disease stage and/or significant symptom burden.14,15”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [14] source

      The Results (page unavailable) associate stage IV disease with greater functional limitation due to emotional distress, and the Introduction (page unavailable) reports an association between cancer-related pain and emotional distress. The paper does not establish that depressive symptoms themselves are elevated with advanced stage or significant symptom burden; emotional distress and its functional effects are not the same measure. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [15] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Depression and anxiety usually co-occur in patients with cancer, as in those without cancer.

    “As is the case for those without cancer, depression and anxiety usually co-occur.30”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [30] source

      The Discussion reports the prevalence of major depression in the cancer cohort and its association with survival, but does not report whether depression and anxiety co-occur. Searches for depression–anxiety co-occurrence and comorbid anxiety found no passage addressing that claim or the comparison with people without cancer. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.75)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    In studies not screening patients for enrollment, CBT plus BT (relaxation) and education plus self-care significantly improved depression.

    “In studies not screening patients for enrollment, CBT plus BT (relaxation) 77,100 and education plus self-care 123 significantly improved depression.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [77] source

      The Discussion (Strengths and Limitations) says the trial had no minimum cancer-related distress requirement for enrollment. The Results (Psychological Adaptation Indicators) report significant reductions in depressive affect, but CBT and relaxation training were separate treatment groups, not a combined intervention. The education-plus-self-care claim carries a different citation and is not assessed here. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [100] source

      The Study Conditions and Results > Intervention Effects sections report that CBT-based stress management with relaxation training produced significantly fewer depressive symptoms than the psychoeducational control at five years. The Participants and Procedures section lists present or past major depressive disorder among the exclusion criteria, so the study does not fully support describing enrollment as unscreened. The separately cited education-plus-self-care claim is not attributed to this paper. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [123] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Study participants included in the long-term follow-up were older and reported fewer depressive symptoms and greater well-being at the time of diagnosis than those who did not participate.

    “Study participants included in the long-term follow-up were older and reported fewer depressive symptoms and greater well-being at the time of diagnosis than those who did not participate.101”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    A psychoeducational intervention for gynecologic surgery patients and BT provided via a mobile app for patients with metastatic disease had no effect compared with an attention control or mobile health education app control, respectively.

    “A psychoeducational intervention for gynecologic surgery patients 73 and BT provided via a mobile app for patients with metastatic disease had no effect compared with an attention control or mobile health education app control, respectively.76”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [73] source
    • cites [76] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    A self-report bias may have played a role in the measures collected.

    “Moreover, a self-report bias may have played a role in the measures collected.101”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Meta-analyses evaluating MBSR interventions during and after cancer treatment demonstrate statistically significant improvements in both depression and anxiety compared with usual care.

    “Meta-analyses evaluating the impact of MBSR interventions during and after cancer treatment demonstrate statistically significant improvements in both depression and anxiety compared with usual care.56,62,64”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [56] source

      The Results (Primary and Secondary Outcomes; page unavailable) report statistically significant short- and medium-term reductions in anxiety and depression for mindfulness-based interventions. The anxiety subgroup result is significant for MBSR, and trials included interventions during and after cancer treatment. But the depression result pools multiple intervention types, and the comparisons pool usual care with other controls; the paper does not establish that MBSR specifically improved both outcomes compared with usual care. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [62] source
    • cites [64] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Although evidence of long-term benefit has been reported, the generalizability of this finding is limited.

    “Although evidence of longterm benefit has been reported, 101 the generalizability of this finding is limited.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    In one trial of screened patients with mixed cancer types, no significant difference between CBT versus TAU was found; however, uptake of CBT was limited, reducing the likelihood of detecting a treatment effect.

    “In one trial of screened patients with mixed cancer types, no significant difference between CBT versus TAU 98 was found; however, uptake of CBT was limited, reducing the likelihood of detecting a treatment effect.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [98] source

      The Main outcome (p. 5) reports no benefit from CBT versus treatment as usual, and the Limitations (p. 7) report limited therapy uptake. But the paper says low uptake *may* have reduced the overall treatment effect; it does not establish that it reduced the likelihood of detecting one. Its per-session analysis also found that even 12 sessions would not have produced a clinically meaningful change. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Trials of problem-solving therapies alone or behavior change programs did not show a statistically significant benefit for depression.

    “Trials of problem-solving therapies alone, 103 or behavior change programs 72 did not show a statistically significant benefit for depression.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [103] source

      The Results (Planned Secondary Analyses of Individual Outcomes; page not supplied) report no difference from controls in depressive-symptom improvement for either intervention arm. However, this trial tested an online program alone or combined with problem-solving treatment, not problem-solving therapy alone. The separately cited behavior-change-program claim is outside this source’s attribution. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [72] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Since the 2014 guideline, screening is a care aim that has been disseminated, but the principle and procedures remain to be fully implemented.

    “Since the 2014 guideline, screening is a care aim that has been disseminated, but the principle and procedures remain to be fully implemented.134,135”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [134] source
    • cites [135] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Many patients from socially or economically marginalized communities have limited access to medical care and may not receive guideline concordant care.

    “it is important to note that many patients from socially or economically marginalized communities have limited access to medical care and may not receive guideline concordant care.146”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [146] source

      The Background says income, education, ethnicity and payer status may affect access to health care, supporting the access portion of the claim in the context of breast cancer. The Discussion explicitly says adherence to National Comprehensive Cancer Network treatment guidelines was not studied, so the paper does not establish that marginalized patients may receive non-guideline-concordant care. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Known factors that increase the risk of suicide in patients with cancer include older age at diagnosis, lower level of education, nonpartnered relationship status, living in rural or sparsely populated areas, psychological comorbidity, hopelessness, advanced stages of cancer, and poor performance status.

    “There are several known factors that increase the risk of suicide in patients with cancer, including older age at diagnosis, lower level of education, nonpartnered relationship status, living in rural or sparsely populated areas, psychological comorbidity, hopelessness, advanced stages of cancer, and poor performance status.143,144”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [143] source

      The Suicide Risk Factors table (p. 639) lists older age at diagnosis, lower education, rural residence, non-marital status, psychological comorbidity, and advanced cancer. Its physical-risk-factor entry lists poor physical functioning, which is close to, but not explicitly termed, poor performance status. The copy mentions the Beck Hopelessness Scale as a depression-assessment tool, but does not identify hopelessness itself as a suicide risk factor. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [144] Potter AL, 2023, JAMA Oncol

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    CBT and BA effects for depression and anxiety are robust, generalizing across sex, age, disease site, time in the cancer trajectory, and patients from the United States, English-speaking countries, Europe, and Asia.

    “The CBT and BA effects for depression and anxiety are robust, generalizing across sex, age, disease site, time in the cancer trajectory, and patients from the United States, Englishspeaking countries, Europe, and Asia, all consistent with large-scale population-based US tests.142”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [142] source

      The Abstract (Materials and Methods and Results; page not provided) reports improved anxiety and depression symptoms in 6,738 U.S.-based adults receiving blended-care CBT, supporting the large-scale U.S. results cited in the final clause. But the Methods (Study Design; page not provided) describes a self-referring, employer-benefit cohort, not a population-based sample. The paper does not establish effects of behavioral activation or generalization across cancer sites, stages, or countries outside the United States. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Accrual of study participants occurred during active oncologic treatment in 20% of all included studies and during the post-treatment phase in 41%.

    “Accrual of study participants occurred during active oncologic treatment in 20% of all included studies and during the post-treatment phase in 41%.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The duration of the interventions in the nonpharmacologic studies ranged from a single session to 24 sessions spanning 12 months.

    “The duration of the interventions in the nonpharmacologic studies ranged from a single session to 24 sessions spanning 12 months.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    All but four studies provided a statistical power calculation, and some trials were underpowered to detect change, a situation worsened without screening.

    “All but four studies 67,69,78,102 provided a statistical power calculation and some trials were underpowered to detect change, a situation worsened without screening.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    73% of the RCTs did not originate from the United States, but internationally from Europe, Asia, Australia, and Canada.

    “It is noted that a substantial proportion (73%) of the RCTs did not originate from the United States, but internationally: Europe (10 studies), Asia (16 studies), Australia (four studies), and Canada (two studies).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Of the 44 RCTs, screening criteria of some type were used in 15 studies (34%) and not used in 66% of trials.

    “Of the 44 RCTs, screening criteria of some type were used in 15 studies or 34% (42% [eight of 19] of depression studies; 33% [one of three] of anxiety studies; and 27% [six of 22] of depression plus anxiety studies) and not used in 66% of trials.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    For US-based studies, participation of individuals other than European or American ranged from 1% to 73%, with 12 studies reporting less than 30% ethnic and/or racial minority participation.

    “For the US-based studies, ethnic and/or racial reporting varied in specificity and numbers, and participation of individuals other than European or American ranged from 1% to 73%, with 12 studies reporting ,30% ethnic and/or racial minority participation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Follow-up was less than 3 months in seven studies and extended to 3 months or more in 20 studies.

    “Follow-up was ,3 months in seven studies and extended to 3 months or more in 20 studies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    The time elapsed since cancer diagnosis ranged from less than a month to 5 years.

    “The time elapsed since cancer diagnosis ranged from less than a month to 5 years.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Few trials explored the causes of missingness or contrasted patients with complete versus incomplete (missing) data.

    “Unfortunately, few trials explored the causes of missingness or contrasted patients with complete versus incomplete (missing) data.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Depression outcomes in RCTs were assessed in multiple ways, with self-reports predominant and some use of structured diagnostic interviews.

    “Depression outcomes in RCTs were assessed in multiple ways, with self-reports (Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition and Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale) predominant and some use of structured diagnostic interviews (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale [HAM-D] and Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Anxiety and/or depression treatment outcomes were assessed only before and after treatment in 17 RCTs and before, after, and with follow-up in 27 trials.

    “Anxiety and/or depression treatment outcomes were assessed only before and after treatment in 17 RCTs and before, after, and with follow-up in 27 trials.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Sample sizes ranged from 62 to 500 in the RCTs using screening and 74 to 2,140 in RCTs with unscreened participants.

    “Sample sizes ranged from 62 to 500 in the RCTs using screening and 74 to 2,140 in RCTs with unscreened participants.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The mean age of study participants ranged from 47.5 to 64 years, and the proportion of female participants varied from 11% to 100%, except one trial exclusively in men with prostate cancer.

    “The mean age of study participants ranged from 47.5 to 64 years, and the proportion of female participants varied from 11% to 100%, with the exception of one trial exclusively in men with prostate cancer.97”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Approximately one third of studies included two or more active treatment arms, either with an additional control arm (seven studies) or without (12 studies).

    “However, approximately one third of studies included two or more active treatment arms, either with an additional control arm (seven studies) or without (12 studies).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The majority of the interventions were delivered face-to-face, although 12 studies involved remote options including telephone or virtual sessions.

    “The majority of the interventions were delivered face-to-face, although 12 studies involved remote options including telephone or virtual sessions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    36% of RCTs included patients with various cancer types and stages, and close to a third of studies were exclusively in patients with breast cancer.

    “Many of the RCTs (36%) included patients with various cancer types and stages, although close to a third of studies were exclusively in patients with breast cancer.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Twelve studies of psychological or social therapies with or without educational components were identified, with half screening patients for enrollment.

    “Twelve studies of psychological or social therapies with or without educational components were identified, with half screening patients for enrollment.68,69,74,98,105,106”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingnone given

    Interventions for managing both depression and anxiety were evaluated in 12 meta-analyses and one systematic review.

    “Interventions for managing both depression and anxiety were evaluated in 12 meta-analyses and one systematic review.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Meta-analyses in patients with cancer report that exercise both during and after cancer treatment provides a moderate to large reduction in depression and may offer a reduction in anxiety.

    “Meta-analyses in patients with cancer report that exercise both during and after cancer treatment provides a moderate to large reduction in depression and may offer a reduction in anxiety.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    In terminally ill patients with cancer, methylphenidate as add-on therapy to mirtazapine improved antidepressant response from the third day of treatment onward, and resulted in clinically significant improved response rate from the second week onward.

    “In terminally ill patients with cancer, methylphenidate as add-on therapy to mirtazapine improved antidepressant response from the third day of treatment onward, and resulted in clinically significant improved response rate, as measured by the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale, from the second week onward.89”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [89] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    In 11 of the meta-analyses, CBT was evaluated and all found CBT to result in significant reductions in depressive and anxiety symptoms.

    “In 11 of the meta-analyses, CBT was evaluated and all found CBT to result in significant reductions in depressive and anxiety symptoms.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The RCT by Alamdarsaravi found significantly decreased HAM-D scores at 4 and 6 weeks compared with placebo, and significantly more responders at 6 weeks.

    “The RCT by Alamdarsaravi found significantly decreased HAM-D scores at 4 and 6 weeks compared with placebo, and significantly more responders at 6 weeks.66”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [66] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    A published meta-analysis confirmed that collaborative care interventions were significantly more effective than usual care (standardized mean difference = -0.49; P = .003), and depression reduction was maintained at 12 months.

    “A published meta-analysis, 115 which included these two studies along with five other RCTs, confirmed that collaborative care interventions were significantly more effective than usual care (standardized mean difference 5 20.49; P 5 .003),and depression reduction was maintained at 12 months.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [115] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Depression care consisting of individually delivered multicomponent behavioral therapy, including BA and problem-solving, significantly reduced depressive symptoms compared with treatment as usual in patients with nonadvanced cancer, as well as in lung cancer patients with advanced disease.

    “Depression care consisting of individually delivered multicomponent behavioral therapy, including BA and problem-solving, significantly reduced depressive symptoms compared with treatment as usual in patients with nonadvanced cancer, 99 as well as in lung cancer patients with advanced disease.107”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [99] source
    • cites [107] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Ho reported null effects for both supportive expressive therapy and a mind-body-spirit intervention compared with an unstructured peer support group.

    “Finally, Ho 79 reported null effects for both supportive expressive therapy and a mind-body-spirit intervention compared with an unstructured peer support group.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Two studies reported positive effects at day 3, a finding of unknown consequence.

    “The Data Supplement outlines two studies 89,108 reporting positive effects at day 3, a finding of unknown consequence”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    Many of the interventions reviewed were delivered after primary oncologic treatments were completed.

    “many of the interventions reviewed were delivered after primary oncologic treatments were completed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    All treatments in the palliative care RCTs were successful in significantly reducing anxiety and depressive symptoms.

    “All treatments were successful in significantly reducing anxiety and depressive symptoms, with the exception of the Hoek trial, 80 which found null effects on depressive symptoms.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Some components of the tested treatments may have empirical support (e.g., problem solving), whereas other components do not (e.g., diary keeping).

    “Some components of the tested treatments may have empirical support (eg, problem solving), whereas other components do not (eg, diary keeping).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The noninferiority trial comparing internet-delivered CBT without coaching versus with coaching showed no significant differences, and improvements occurred for both groups.

    “The one noninferiority trial comparing internet-delivered CBT without coaching versus with coaching 75 showed no significant differences and improvements occurred for both groups”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Our systematic review shows CBT and BA achieve robust effects on symptom reduction.

    “As for management, our systematic review shows CBT and BA achieve robust effects on symptom reduction.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation

    Several studies included assessments during the course of treatment.

    “First, several studies included assessments during the course of treatment (eg, Zhao 111 )”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Two rigorous UK studies described a 10-session multicomponent BT treatment for MDD, which achieved depression remission and other gains with medication management.

    “two rigorous studies from the United Kingdom 99,107 both described a 10-session multicomponent BT treatment for MDD, which achieved depression remission and other gains in which medication management was also provided.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    This review shows CBT and BA continue to be first-line treatments of choice, with added support for components used alone or in combination.

    “This review shows these treatments continue to be first-line treatments of choice, with added support for components (eg, problem solving) used alone or in combination.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    Other studies had sample sizes just within the cutoff for systematic review inclusion (N=40).

    “with other studies having sample sizes just within the cutoff for systematic review inclusion (N 5 40).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Anxiety, of which generalized anxiety disorder is the most prevalent in this population, is common and continues to be an underaddressed condition.

    “Along with depression, anxiety, of which generalized anxiety disorder is the most prevalent in this population, 19 is common and continues to be an underaddressed condition.[20][21][22]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [19] source
    • cites [20] source
    • cites [21] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In studies using diagnostic interviews, the prevalence of anxiety is approximately 10%.

    “In studies using diagnostic interviews, the prevalence is approximately 10%.37”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [37] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    A conservative estimate of the number of patients with newly diagnosed cancer in 2023 with comorbid MDD is approximately 286,000 adults.

    “Taken together, a conservative estimate (14.3%) of the number of patients with newly diagnosed cancer in 2023 with comorbid MDD will be approximately 286,000 adults.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: When diagnostic criteria for MDD are used, the prevalence is 14.3%.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Arch et al found that 31% of patients with cancer with an anxiety disorder also had major depressive disorder (MDD).

    “Notably, Arch et al 19 found that 31% of patients with cancer with an anxiety disorder also had major depressive disorder (MDD).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [19] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Stress, depression, and anxiety are prevalent and occur throughout the survivorship trajectory.

    “stress, depression, and anxiety are prevalent and occur throughout the survivorship trajectory.8,9”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [8] source
    • cites [9] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    A conservative estimate of the number of new cases having a comorbid anxiety disorder is 200,000 individuals.

    “Again, a conservative estimate (10%) of the number of new cases having a comorbid anxiety disorder would be 200,000 individuals.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    For anxiety, studies using self-report instruments with specified cutoff points find prevalence estimates between 4% and 48%.

    “For anxiety, studies using self-report instruments with specified cutoff points (eg, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale $ 8) find prevalence estimates between 4% and 48%.36”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [36] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Systematic reviews and meta-analyses were evaluated using the assessment of multiple systematic reviews rating.

    “Systematic reviews and metaanalyses were evaluated using the assessment of multiple systematic reviews rating”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The Expert Panel was assembled in accordance with ASCO's Conflict of Interest Policy Implementation for Clinical Practice Guidelines.

    “The Expert Panel was assembled in accordance with ASCO's Conflict of Interest Policy Implementation for Clinical Practice Guidelines (”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Members of the Expert Panel reviewed and approved the penultimate version, which was circulated for external review and submitted to the Journal of Clinical Oncology for editorial review.

    “Members of the Expert Panel were responsible for reviewing and approving the penultimate version of the guideline, which was then circulated for external review, and submitted to the Journal of Clinical Oncology for editorial review and consideration for publication.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Study quality was formally assessed for all 61 studies identified.

    “Study quality was formally assessed for all 61 studies identified.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    All ASCO guidelines are ultimately reviewed and approved by the Expert Panel and the ASCO Evidence Based Medicine Committee before publication.

    “All ASCO guidelines are ultimately reviewed and approved by the Expert Panel and the ASCO Evidence Based Medicine Committee before publication.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    As is common in psychosocial intervention trials, having truly blind assessors is difficult to achieve, making use of standardized measures and evaluation of rater reliability critical design choices.

    “As is common in psychosocial intervention trials, having truly blind assessors is difficult to achieve, making use of standardized measures and evaluation of rater reliability critical design choices.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    RCTs were evaluated for random assignment, allocation concealment, blinding of outcome assessment, baseline equivalence, loss to follow-up/missing data, and intent-to-treat analyses.

    “To evaluate RCTs, research design characteristics including random assignment, allocation concealment, blinding of outcome assessment(s), baseline equivalence between groups, extent of loss to follow-up and/or missing data, and the use of intent-totreat analyses were evaluated”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The majority of the members of the Expert Panel did not disclose any relationships constituting a conflict under the Policy.

    “In accordance with the Policy, the majority of the members of the Expert Panel did not disclose any relationships constituting a conflict under the Policy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    PubMed was searched from January 2013 through May 2021, restricted to meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and randomized controlled trials published in English.

    “PubMed was searched from January 2013 through May 2021.The search was restricted to meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in English.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Collaborative care is found to be superior to usual care and is more cost-effective than face-to-face and pharmacologic treatment for depression.

    “This type of collaborative care is found to be superior to usual care 115 and is more cost-effective than face-to-face and pharmacologic treatment for depression.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [115] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The diversity in the included studies precluded a quantitative analysis, so a qualitative review was performed.

    “Overall, the diversity in the included studies precluded a quantitative analysis and, as such, a qualitative review was performed.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The quality of the evidence for each outcome was assessed based on elements of the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and the GRADE quality assessment and recommendations development process.

    “The quality of the evidence for each outcome was assessed based on elements of the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and the GRADE quality assessment and recommendations development process.45,46”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [45] source
    • cites [46] Cumpston M, 2019, Cochrane Database Syst Rev source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Small sample sizes substantially increase the likelihood of baseline differences, but for some studies the sample sizes were more than adequate and yet statistically significant baseline differences were found.

    “While small sample sizes substantially increase the likelihood of baseline differences, for some studies, the sample sizes were more than adequate (eg, N .145) and yet statistically significant baseline differences were found.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    All funding for the administration of the project was provided by ASCO.

    “All funding for the administration of the project was provided by ASCO.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Articles excluded were meeting abstracts not subsequently published, editorials, commentaries, letters, news articles, case reports, narrative reviews, and non-English publications.

    “Articles excluded were the following: • Meeting abstracts not subsequently published in peerreviewed journals • Editorials, commentaries, letters, news articles, case reports, and narrative reviews • Publication in a non-English language.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    All members of the Expert Panel completed ASCO's disclosure form, which requires disclosure of financial and other interests.

    “All members of the Expert Panel completed ASCO's disclosure form, which requires disclosure of financial and other interests, including relationships with commercial entities that are reasonably likely to experience direct regulatory or commercial impact as a result of promulgation of the guideline.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Many trials had small sample sizes and/or high attrition rates impacting statistical power and lowering confidence in the findings.

    “Many trials had small sample sizes and/or high attrition rates impacting statistical power and lowering confidence in the findings.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Data missingness elevates the risk of bias because the listed circumstances are nonrandom, and missingness is made worse by not determining its origins.

    “Data missingness elevates the risk of bias as the listed circumstances are nonrandom, and missingness is made worse by not determining its origins.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Other benefits of a stepped care model are opportunity for tailoring of patient care and optimized resource allocation.

    “In addition to efficacy, other benefits of a stepped care model are opportunity for tailoring of patient care and optimized resource allocation.116”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [116] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In 2023, an estimated two million new cancer cases will be diagnosed in the United States.

    “In 2023, an estimated two million new cancer cases will be diagnosed.31”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [31] American Cancer Society, 2022

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The guideline recommendations were posted for an open comment period of 2 weeks, allowing the public to review and comment.

    “The guideline recommendations were posted for an open comment period of 2 weeks, allowing the public to review and comment on the recommendations after submitting a confidentiality agreement.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The detection of differences between active treatments demands large sample sizes, as the experimental question is degree of improvement, not improvement per se.

    “Also, the detection of differences between active treatments demands large sample sizes, as the experimental question is degree of improvement, not improvement per se.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Effective education in people with cancer and their families includes normalizing the experience, providing information about the nature and symptoms of depression and anxiety, and specifying the nature of symptom worsening that may warrant a call to the health care provider.

    “Effective education in people with cancer and their families includes normalizing the experience, providing information about the nature and symptoms of depression and anxiety, and specifying the nature of symptom worsening that may warrant a call to the health care provider.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    High mortality can be expected in trials accruing patients with advanced disease and/or in the palliative care setting, but even death is a nonrandom event.

    “High mortality can be expected in trials accruing patients with advanced disease and/or in the palliative care setting, but even death is a nonrandom event.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Each included publication was assessed for methodological quality by one methodologist.

    “Each included publication was assessed for methodological quality by one methodologist.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Assessment of methodological quality by a single methodologist is sufficient to determine study quality.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The 2014 ASCO guideline was an adaptation of a Pan-Canadian Practice Guideline on Screening, Assessment, and Care of Psychosocial Distress (Depression, Anxiety) in Adults with Cancer.

    “The 2014 guideline was an adaptation of a Pan-Canadian Practice Guideline on Screening, Assessment, and Care of Psychosocial Distress (Depression, Anxiety) in Adults with Cancer, 44 which addressed the following three research questions:”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [44] Howell DKH, Esplen MJ, Hack T, et al: A Pan Canadian Practice Guideline: Screening, assessment and care of psychosocial distress, depression, and anxiety in adults with cancer, in Canadian Partnership Against Cancer and the Canadian Association of Psychosocial Oncology (ed). Toronto, 2015

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The historical weight of evidence for CBT and BA is most compelling.

    “However, the historical weight of evidence for CBT and BA is most compelling.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In a meta-analysis of 14 studies with over 900 patients, exercise had a large effect compared with usual care for both depression and anxiety.

    “In a meta-analysis of 14 studies with over 900 patients, Singh et al 59 reported a large effect in favor of exercise compared with usual care for both depression and anxiety.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Singh et al 59

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    In particular, psychosocial interventions, stress reduction strategies, and a combination of CBT, hypnosis, and support are effective over standard care.

    “In particular, psychosocial interventions, stress reduction strategies, and a combination of CBT, hypnosis, and support are effective over standard care.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    None of the anxiety interventions could be characterized as testing empirically supported anxiety treatments but rather stress reduction strategies, with some addition of behavioral therapy strategies or education.

    “None of the interventions could be characterized as testing empirically supported anxiety treatments (eg, BA, exposure) but rather stress reduction strategies (eg, relaxation, hypnosis), with some addition of behavioral therapy strategies (activity planning, problem solving), or education.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The McGettigan et al meta-analysis found no significant difference in depression nor anxiety with physical activity in the short term or medium term.

    “The meta-analysis by McGettigan et al 55 found no significant difference in depression nor anxiety with PA in the short term or medium term.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites McGettigan et al 55

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Both celecoxib trials were small, with 52 and 40 participants, respectively, and included samples in which a COX-2 inhibitor might have also contributed to improved physical symptoms.

    “However, both trials were small, with 52 and 40 participants, respectively, and included samples in which a COX-2 inhibitor might have also contributed to improved physical symptoms.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [66] source
    • cites [86] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Correlates of elevated symptoms include current or prior psychiatric diagnosis, other chronic medical conditions, adverse social determinants of health, and poor functional status.

    “Correlates of elevated symptoms include those with a current or prior psychiatric diagnosis, other chronic medical conditions, adverse social determinants of health, and poor functional status, among others (Table 3).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Table 3

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Screening has the potential benefit of reducing sample size.

    “In RCTs, screening of patients is essential (used in only one third of studies) and has the potential benefit of reducing sample size.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Data loss threatens the reliability and validity of findings.

    “Data loss threatens the reliability and validity of findings.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    In RCTs, screening of patients is essential.

    “In RCTs, screening of patients is essential (used in only one third of studies) and has the potential benefit of reducing sample size.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Other decisions can reduce statistical power, such as small sample sizes, sizes insufficient to detect effects between active treatments, or sample size reduced across time.

    “Other decisions can reduce statistical power, such as small sample sizes in general, sizes insufficient to detect effects between active treatments, or when any sample size is reduced across time.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Factors such as race and ethnicity, age, socioeconomic status, sexual orientation and gender identity, geographic location, and access to medical and mental health insurance are known to impact cancer care outcomes.

    “Factors such as race and ethnicity, age, socioeconomic status, sexual orientation and gender identity, geographic location, and access to medical and mental health insurance are known to impact cancer care outcomes.148”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [148] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    High mortality may be anticipated in trials accruing patients with advanced disease and/or in the palliative care setting.

    “As noted earlier, high mortality may be anticipated in trials accruing patients with advanced disease and/or in the palliative care setting.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Earlier trials show negative effects for peer support conditions, countering assumptions of peer support being uniformly beneficial.

    “These data align with earlier trials showing negative effects for peer support conditions, 133 countering assumptions of peer support being uniformly beneficial.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [133] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Risk of bias was low in one trial, with the others having high risk of bias in two or three key areas.

    “Risk of bias was low in one trial, 104 with the others having high risk of bias in two 80 or three 81 key areas.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Patients with cancer who are members of racial and/or ethnic minorities suffer disproportionately from comorbidities, experience more substantial obstacles to receiving care, are more likely to be uninsured, and are at greater risk of receiving fragmented care or poor-quality care than other Americans.

    “Patients with cancer who are members of racial and/or ethnic minorities suffer disproportionately from comorbidities, experience more substantial obstacles to receiving care, are more likely to be uninsured, and are at greater risk of receiving fragmented care or poor-quality care than other Americans.[149][150][151][152]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [149] US Cancer Statistics Working Group, 2015

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [150] Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER): Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2017. Bethesda, MD, NIH publication, 1975-2017, 2020

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [151] Mead H, 2008
    • cites [152] American Cancer Society, 2016

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Baseline group differences are less likely when randomizing within strata, as variables potentially correlated with the outcome can reduce nuisance subject variance.

    “a circumstance less likely when randomizing within strata, as variables potentially correlated with the outcome can reduce nuisance subject variance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Such approaches limit the interpretation of the findings and hinder replication by other investigators and the accumulation of knowledge supporting one treatment over another.

    “Such approaches limit the interpretation of the findings, and hinder replication by other investigators and the accumulation of knowledge supporting one treatment over another.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Finding significant pre-treatment to post-treatment effects is necessary but often not sufficient to confirm treatment effectiveness with depressed or anxious patients.

    “Finding significant pre-treatment to post-treatment effects is necessary but often not sufficient to confirm treatment effectiveness with depressed or anxious patients.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: MDD is known not to improve or improve and then worsen.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The pathognomic GAD symptom, multiple excessive worries, may present as concerns or fears.

    “The pathognomic GAD symptom, ie, multiple excessive worries, may present as concerns or fears.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [7] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Omitting the self-harm item from the PHQ-9 may artificially lower the score, with the risk of some patients appearing to have fewer symptoms than they actually do.

    “It should be noted, however, that doing so may artificially lower the score, with the risk of some patients appearing to have fewer symptoms than they actually do.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: One of the remaining seven items of the PHQ-9 assesses thoughts of self-harm.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    An individual with GAD has worries about a range of other, noncancer topics and areas of his/her life.

    “Importantly, an individual with GAD has worries about a range of other, noncancer topics and areas of his/her life.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [7] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    This disparity widens in survivors who are also from a racial or ethnic minority, underscoring the influence of intersectionality in cancer health disparities.

    “This disparity widens in survivors who are also from a racial or ethnic minority, underscoring the influence of intersectionality in cancer health disparities.153,158”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [153] American Association for Cancer Research, 2022

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [158] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Two draft statements achieved 100% agreement, 10 achieved >90% agreement, and four achieved >85% agreement; none achieved <85% agreement.

    “Two draft statements achieved 100% agreement, 10 achieved .90%agreement, and four draft statements received .85%agreement.None of the draft recommendations achieved ,85% agreement.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The CAPO and the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer guideline recommends screening for psychosocial health care needs at initial diagnosis, start of treatment, regular intervals during treatment, end of treatment, post-treatment or transition to survivorship, recurrence or progression, advanced disease, when dying, and during times of personal transition or reappraisal.

    “The CAPO and the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer (the Partnership) guideline Assessment of Psychosocial Health Care Needs of the Adult Cancer Patient suggests screening at initial diagnosis, start of treatment, regular intervals during treatment, end of treatment, post-treatment or at transition to survivorship, at recurrence or progression, advanced disease, when dying,”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites CAPO and the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer guideline

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The patient's endorsement of multiple symptoms defines the need for services for moderate/severe to severe symptomatology.

    “Thus, it is the patient's endorsement of multiple symptoms that will define the need for services for moderate/ severe to severe symptomatology.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Individuals do not typically endorse a self-harm item exclusively or independent of other symptoms; rather, it occurs with several other symptom endorsements.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Patients with GAD do not necessarily present with symptoms of anxiety, per se.

    “Patients with GAD do not necessarily present with symptoms of anxiety, per se.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [7] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The draft was submitted to two external reviewers with content expertise; it was rated as high quality and agreed it would be useful in practice.

    “The draft was submitted to two external reviewers with content expertise.It was rated as high quality, and it was agreed it would be useful in practice.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The draft recommendations were released for public open comment from September 19 through October 3, 2022, with 126 written comments received from 28 respondents.

    “The draft recommendations were released to the public for open comment from September 19 through October 3, 2022.Response categories of”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Omitting the self-harm item weakens the predictive validity of the score and the clarity of the cutoff scores.

    “Such changes also weaken the predictive validity of the score and the clarity of the cutoff scores.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: One of the remaining seven items of the PHQ-9 assesses thoughts of self-harm.
114 of 114
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Adults diagnosed with cancer report higher levels of stress than healthy controls, with diagnosis and the start of treatment being the most stressful times.

    “Adults diagnosed with cancer report higher levels of stress than healthy controls, with diagnosis and the start of treatment being the most stressful times.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The most common depressive disorders among patients with cancer are major depression and adjustment disorder, with data for other depressive disorders scarce.

    “The most common depressive disorders among patients with cancer are major depression and adjustment disorder, with data for other depressive disorders scarce.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Depression is often accompanied by functional impairment, poorer physical health, substance use, and low quality of life, influenced by impaired relationships, reduced physical activity, and other factors.

    “Depression is often accompanied by functional impairment, poorer physical health, substance use, and low quality of life, influenced in turn by impaired relationships, reduced physical activity (PA), and other factors.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Clinical depression does not remit, and patients remain at risk for self harm and/or suicide.

    “Clinical depression does not remit, and patients remain at risk for self harm and/or suicide.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    A possible danger exists for depressed patients who are not treated.

    “In addition to the psychological, behavioral, and biologic disruption associated with depression and anxiety after cancer, a possible danger exists for depressed patients who are not treated.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    When diagnostic criteria for MDD are used, the prevalence is 14.3%.

    “When diagnostic criteria for MDD are used, the prevalence is 14.3%.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Assessment of methodological quality by a single methodologist is sufficient to determine study quality.

    “Each included publication was assessed for methodological quality by one methodologist.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Problems with access to psychological care for cancer patients with depression and/or anxiety can be attributed to organizational and workforce obstacles, such as a shortage of mental health professionals, and limited referral networks for managing depression and anxiety.

    “Problems with access to psychological care for cancer patients with depression and/or anxiety can be attributed to organizational and workforce obstacles, such as a shortage of mental health professionals, and limited referral networks for managing depression and anxiety.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    MDD is known not to improve or improve and then worsen.

    “particularly for disorders such as MDD known not to improve or improve and then worsen.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Social determinants of health such as race/ethnicity, gender identity, and socioeconomic status covary with adverse cancer and mental health outcomes.

    “It is known that social determinants of health such as these covary with adverse cancer and mental health outcomes.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The mental health care crisis is a widespread issue that affects individuals with all types of medical conditions, including patients with cancer.

    “The mental health care crisis is a widespread issue that affects individuals with all types of medical conditions, including patients with cancer.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    It is estimated that 25%-30% of patients would need to complete the remaining items of the PHQ-9 after endorsing the first two items.

    “It is estimated that 25%-30% of patients would need to complete the remaining items.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The traditional cutoff for the PHQ-9 is .10.

    “The traditional cutoff for the PHQ-9 is .10.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    One of the remaining seven items of the PHQ-9 assesses thoughts of self-harm.

    “Of special note, one of remaining seven items of the PHQ-9 assesses thoughts of self-harm, ie, thoughts that you would be better off dead or hurting yourself in some way.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Among patients with moderate to severe or severe depression, thoughts of self-harm are not rare.

    “Among patients with moderate to severe or severe depression, such thoughts are not rare.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Individuals do not typically endorse a self-harm item exclusively or independent of other symptoms; rather, it occurs with several other symptom endorsements.

    “It is important to note that individuals do not typically endorse a self-harm item exclusively or independent of other symptom; rather, it occurs with several other symptom endorsements.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    A range of problem checklists is available to guide the assessment of possible stressors.

    “A range of problem checklists is available to guide the assessment of possible stressors.”
17 of 17

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ACT as a therapeutic treatment modality for survivors has a growing evidence base, supporting survivors in cultivating present-moment awareness and disentangling from rigid thoughts about themselves and their cancer.

    “ACT as a therapeutic treatment modality for survivors has a growing evidence base [37,57-59], supporting survivors in cultivating present-moment awareness and disentangling from rigid thoughts about themselves and their cancer [60].”

    From Co-Designing the MOSAIC mHealth App With Breast Cancer Survivors: User-Centered Design Approach (2024) · cites this paper as [37]

    The anxiety care map lists acceptance and commitment therapy as an intervention option for adults with cancer, supporting its use as a treatment modality. The passages found do not establish that its evidence base is growing. The description of present-moment awareness and disentangling from rigid thoughts is attached to a different citation [60], not this source. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • ACT has shown effectiveness in improving health outcomes for breast cancer survivors and is a recommended evidence-based treatment for cancer survivors by the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

    “We predetermined the use of ACT as the foundation for the design of the MOSAIC app because it has shown effectiveness in improving health outcomes for breast cancer survivors [33] and is a recommended evidence-based treatment for cancer survivors by the American Society of Clinical Oncology [37].”

    From Co-Designing the MOSAIC mHealth App With Breast Cancer Survivors: User-Centered Design Approach (2024) · cites this paper as [37]

    The guideline’s generalized-anxiety care map (page unavailable) lists acceptance and commitment therapy as a low-intensity intervention option for adults with cancer. This supports the ASCO-recommendation portion attributed to [37], but the citing sentence omits that the recommendation is for managing anxiety; it does not establish ACT as a treatment for cancer survivors generally. The breast-cancer effectiveness claim is attached to a different citation. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • ACT is listed as one of several evidence-based treatments for adult cancer survivors with moderate symptoms of anxiety in the American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guidelines for depression and anxiety.

    “Furthermore, ACT is listed as 1 of several evidence-based treatments for adult cancer survivors with moderate symptoms of anxiety in the American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guidelines for depression and anxiety [37].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Moderate-anxiety recommendation omits a treatment endorsed in the abstract

    Major

    The abstract says clinicians should offer acceptance and commitment therapy for moderate anxiety, but the corresponding numbered recommendation does not include it among the options clinicians should offer.

  • Depression care map excludes stated exceptions for starting medication

    Major

    The care map says medication is considered only after previous therapies fail to produce remission. Recommendation 2.4 also permits it when first-line treatment is inaccessible or the patient prefers medication, without requiring a prior treatment attempt.

  • The same study is assigned two different interventions

    Minor

    Table 2 identifies Wang 2020, reference 108, as an internet-delivered psychoeducation study in its review section and as a ketamine trial in its pharmacologic section.

3 of 3

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000942 · DOI · Paper page
  2. American Cancer Society, 2022, Cancer Facts & Figures 2022
  3. World Health Organization, 2017, Depression and Other Common Mental Disorders: Global Health Estimates
  4. Taylor D, 2017, CONQUER: The Patient Voice 3
  5. Cumpston M, 2019, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 10, Ed000142
  6. Bergenthal N, 2014, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, Cd009075
  7. Jassim GA, 2015, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, Cd008729
  8. McGettigan M, 2020, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 5, CD012864
  9. Ostuzzi G, 2018, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 4, Cd011006
  10. Ream E, 2020, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 6, Cd007568
  11. Uphoff E, 2020, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 8, Cd013461
  12. Wang J, 2020, Med Sci Monit, 26, e922028
  13. Devine EC, 1995, Oncol Nurs Forum, 22, 1369
  14. Potter AL, 2023, JAMA Oncol, 12, e226549
  15. US Cancer Statistics Working Group, 2015, United States Cancer Statistics: 1999–2012 Incidence and Mortality Web-Based Report
  16. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER): Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2017. Bethesda, MD, NIH publication, 1975-2017, 2020
  17. American Cancer Society, 2016, Cancer Facts & Figures for African Americans 2016-2018
  18. American Association for Cancer Research, 2022, Cancer Disparities Progress Report
  19. Alpert A, 2021, ASCO Daily News
  20. National Center for Transgender Equality, 2021, Understanding Transgender People: The Basic. Washington, DC
  21. UCSF Transgender Care & Treatment Guidelines: Terminology & Definitions
  22. Howell D, A Pan-Canadian Clinical Practice Guideline: Assessment of Psychosocial Health Care Needs of the Adult Cancer Patient

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Andersen, B. L., Lacchetti, C., Ashing, K., Berek, J. S., Berman, B. S., Bolte, S., Dizon, D. S., Given, B., Nekhlyudov, L., Pirl, W., Stanton, A. L., & Rowland, J. H.
Affiliations
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology (US)
  • City Of Hope National Medical Center (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Florida Cancer Specialists, West Palm Beach, FL
  • Inova Health Foundation, Falls Church, VA
  • Brown University (US)
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Smith Center for Healing and the Arts (US)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2023-06-20
Volume
41
Issue
18
Pages
3426-3453
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W4366448658
Cited by
318
References
155
Citations by year
2026: 128 · 2025: 101 · 2024: 75 · 2023: 13 · 2021: 1
FWCI
38.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology
  • Partenariat Canadien Contre Le Cancer
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
Keywords
cancer survivors, anxiety, depression, psychosocial interventions, mindfulness-based stress reduction, cognitive behavioral therapy, behavioral activation, acceptance and commitment therapy, interpersonal psychotherapy, physical activity, stepped care, pharmacotherapy, ethnic minorities, survivorship care
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Depression, Ethnicity, Humans, Minority Groups, Neoplasms, Survivors, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review