Cited by 52Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionEmotions and Moral BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Negative urgency and emotion regulation strategy use: Associations with displaced aggression

Scott, Jillian Panuzio, DiLillo, David, Maldonado, Rosalita C., Watkins, Laura E.·2015·Aggressive Behavior

Abstract

The numerous public health consequences of interpersonal aggression highlight the necessity of a comprehensive understanding of factors influencing its perpetration. This study examined direct and interactive associations between negative urgency and emotion regulation strategy use in predicting displaced aggression under conditions of negative mood. Participants were 197 male and female undergraduate students who were randomly assigned to employ either cognitive reappraisal or expressive suppression in response to a negative mood induction. Immediately afterwards, participants engaged in an analog displaced aggression task. Results revealed direct, positive associations between negative urgency and aggression. In addition, the use of suppression was associated with greater aggression than was the use of reappraisal alone. Counter to the hypothesis, there were no interactive effects between negative urgency and emotion regulation strategy use in predicting aggression. Findings suggest reducing negative urgency and use of suppression as potential intervention targets for individuals who engage in aggressive behavior.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ab.21588

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Negative urgency significantly and positively relates to IPV in laboratory contexts when negative affect is high.

    “In addition to these established associations, negative urgency significantly and positively relates to IPV in laboratory contexts when negative affect is high, supporting its role in an unfolding event-level time course as an impelling factor of future aggressive behaviors (Bresin et al., 2022; Scott et al., 2015).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Scott, J. P., DiLillo, D., Maldonado, R. C., & Watkins, L. E.
Affiliations
University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
Corresponding author
Scott, Jillian Panuzio
Venue
Aggressive Behavior
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-03-09
Volume
41
Issue
5
Pages
502-512
ISSN
  • 0096-140X (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-2337
OpenAlex
W1909360688
Cited by
52
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2
FWCI
8.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Aggressive Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lincoln (University of Nebraska) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
negative urgency, emotion regulation strategies, displaced aggression, cognitive reappraisal, expressive suppression, negative mood, interpersonal aggression, aggression perpetration, intervention targets
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Aggression, Emotions, Female, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Psychological Tests, Young Adult, Emotional Intelligence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review