Cited by 40Memory Processes and InfluencesSecond Language Acquisition and LearningReading and Literacy Development

Distributed Practice and Retrieval Practice in Primary School Vocabulary Learning: A Multi‐classroom Study

Open access
Goossens, Nicole A. M. C., Camp, Gino, Verkoeijen, Peter P. J. L., Tabbers, Huib K., Bouwmeester, Samantha, Zwaan, Rolf A.·2016·Applied Cognitive Psychology

Abstract

Summary: Distributed practice and retrieval practice are promising learning strategies to use in education. We examined the effects of these strategies in primary school vocabulary lessons. Grades 2, 3, 4, and 6 children performed exercises that were part of the regular curriculum. For the distributed practice manipulation, the children performed six exercises distributed within 1 week (short‐lag repetition) or across 2 weeks (long‐lag repetition). For the repetition type manipulation, children copied a part of the description of a word (restudy) or recalled the description (retrieval practice). At the end of each week, the children received a cued‐recall vocabulary test. After 1 to 11 weeks they received a multiple‐choice vocabulary test. Both on the cued‐recall test and on the multiple‐choice test no benefits of long‐lag repetition and retrieval practice were found. These results put into question the practical value of long‐lag repetition and retrieval practice in real‐life primary school vocabulary lessons.Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/acp.3245

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Despite growing interest in examining distributed practice effects on mathematical learning or in authentic educational settings, both aims have rarely been combined.

    “Despite the growing interest in examining distributed practice effects on mathematical learning (Rohrer & Taylor, 2006, 2007), or distributed practice in authentic educational settings (Goossens et al., 2016;Kapler et al., 2015), both aims have rarely been combined.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goossens, N. A. M. C., Camp, G., Verkoeijen, P. P. J. L., Tabbers, H. K., Bouwmeester, S., & Zwaan, R. A.
Affiliations
  • Open University of the Netherlands (NL)
  • Avans University of Applied Sciences (NL)
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Goossens, Nicole A. M. C.
Venue
Applied Cognitive Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-06-06
Volume
30
Issue
5
Pages
700-712
ISSN
  • 0888-4080 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0720
OpenAlex
W2414637449
Cited by
40
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2
FWCI
2.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Cognitive Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands) (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands) (submittedVersion)
  • DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
Keywords
distributed practice, retrieval practice, vocabulary acquisition, elementary school students, restudy, cued recall, spelling instruction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review