Cited by 97Memory Processes and InfluencesVisual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

A Meta-Analytic Review of the Benefit of Spacing out Retrieval Practice Episodes on Retention

Latimier, Alice, Peyre, Hugo, Ramus, Franck·2021·Educational Psychology Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10648-020-09572-8

Cites

110 of 111 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 112 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Fisher, Z., & Tipton, E. (2015). Robumeta: an R-package for robust variance estimation in meta-analysis. arXiv:1503.02220 [stat]. http://arxiv.org/abs/1503.02220. Accessed 26 July 2018. · arXiv
  2. Lindsey, R., Mozer, M., Cepeda, N. J., & Pashler, H. (2009). Optimizing memory retention with cognitive models. International conference on computing and Mission, 6.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Latimier, A., Peyre, H., & Ramus, F.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Latimier, Alice
Venue
Educational Psychology Review
Published
2020-10-07
Volume
33
Issue
3
Pages
959-987
ISSN
  • 1040-726X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-336X
OpenAlex
W3092361271
Cited by
96
References
112
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3
FWCI
3.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Educational Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Programme d'investissement d'avenir (e-Fran) & Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-17-EURE-0017, ANR-10-IDEX-0001-02 PSL)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords
spaced retrieval practice, memory retention, spacing effect, desirable difficulties, learning strategies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review