The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The consistency of superior face recognition skills in police officers
Abstract
Summary: In recent years, there has been increasing interest in people with superior face recognition skills. Yet identification of these individuals has mostly relied on criterion performance on a single attempt at a single measure of face memory. The current investigation aimed to examine the consistency of superior face recognition skills in 30 police officers, both across tests that tap into the same process and between tests that tap into different components of face processing. Overall indices of performance across related measures were found to identify different superior performers to isolated test scores. Further, different top performers emerged for target‐present versus target‐absent indices, suggesting that signal detection measures are the most useful indicators of performance. Finally, a dissociation was observed between superior memory and matching performance. Super‐recognizer screening programmes hould therefore include overall indices summarizing multiple attempts at related tests, allowing for individuals to rank highly on different (and sometimes very specific) tasks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The facilitated performance of SR9 was restricted to face memory, and this individual achieved the lowest scores in the two matching tasks.
“Consistent with our previous work (Bate et al., 2018; Bate, Frowd, et al., 2019), the facilitated performance of SR9 was restricted to face memory, and this individual achieved the lowest scores in the two matching tasks.”
From Enhanced Matching of Children’s Faces in “Super-Recognisers” But Not High-Contact Controls (2020) · cites this paper as Bate, Frowd, et al., 2019
Psychometric standard tests of face recognition ability may tap different processes to those required by real-world tasks.
“Psychometric standard tests of face recognition ability may tap different processes to those required by real-world tasks”
From Enhanced Matching of Children’s Faces in “Super-Recognisers” But Not High-Contact Controls (2020) · cites this paper as Bate, Frowd, et al. 2019
Some individuals may be only proficient at particular tasks.
“some individuals may be only proficient at particular tasks”
From Enhanced Matching of Children’s Faces in “Super-Recognisers” But Not High-Contact Controls (2020) · cites this paper as Bate, Frowd, et al. 2019
One-off assessments can obscure considerable fluctuation in performance.
“and one-off assessments can obscure considerable fluctuation in the performance (Bate et al., 2018, Bate, Frowd, et al. 2019).”
From Enhanced Matching of Children’s Faces in “Super-Recognisers” But Not High-Contact Controls (2020) · cites this paper as Bate, Frowd, et al. 2019
The two matching tests used in this study had previously been calibrated to an equal difficulty level in a large number of control participants.
“we used two matching tests that had previously been calibrated to an equal difficulty level in a large number of control participants.”
From Enhanced Matching of Children’s Faces in “Super-Recognisers” But Not High-Contact Controls (2020) · cites this paper as Bate, Frowd, et al., 2019
Each version of the task was calibrated to be consistent in difficulty level via materials analyses performed on data collected from a large sample of typical perceivers.
“For this reason, each version of the task was calibrated to be consistent in difficulty level via materials analyses performed on data collected from a large sample of typical perceivers.”
From Enhanced Matching of Children’s Faces in “Super-Recognisers” But Not High-Contact Controls (2020) · cites this paper as Bate, Frowd, et al., 2019
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Young, A. W., & Burton, A. M. (2018) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2017.11.007 · Cited by 235 · cited 3×
“…fact, the matching of two unfamiliar faces of the same identity is a notoriously difficult task (e.g., Jenkins, White, Van Montford, & Burton, 2011; Young & Burton, 2017, 2018), even when external features are present and the two images have been collected on the same day (e.g., Bruce et al.,…”
BackgroundResult
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 38
- 10.1186/s41235-018-0114-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00770 · DOI
- Bate S., 2018, Applied screening tests for the detection of superior face recognition, Cognitive Research: Principals and Implications, 3
- 10.1080/02643290903175004 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cortex.2007.02.004 · DOI
- 10.1080/17470218.2016.1195414 · DOI
- 10.1080/02643294.2017.1402755 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0029635 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01378 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.05.003 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0148148 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/acp.3170 · DOI
- 10.1080/17470218.2016.1161059 · DOI
- 10.1037/1076-898X.5.4.339 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3758/BRM.42.1.286 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/02643294.2012.756809 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00224-X · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/02643290701380491 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.07.001 · DOI
- 10.1108/JFP-10-2014-0033 · DOI
- 10.1348/000712606X104481 · DOI
- 10.1080/10683160310001634313 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0027393 · DOI
- 10.1108/JFP-08-2013-0042 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.08.001 · DOI
- 10.1002/acp.3261 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cortex.2009.07.012 · DOI
- Macmillan N. A., 2005, Detection theory: A user's guide
- 10.1186/s41235-018-0112-9 · DOI
- 10.1080/02643294.2011.616880 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3758/BF03193954 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41598-018-20089-7 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0150972 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0150036 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.12.004 · DOI
- 10.3758/PBR.16.2.252 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0963721416688114 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11336-003-1119-8 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Enhanced Matching of Children’s Faces in “Super-Recognisers” But Not High-Contact Controls
Bate, S., Bennetts, R., Murray, E., & Portch, E. (2020) · i-Perception · doi:10.1177/2041669520944420 · Cited by 12
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bate, S., Frowd, C., Bennetts, R., Hasshim, N., Portch, E., Murray, E., & Dudfield, G.
- Affiliations
- Department of Psychology Bournemouth University Poole UK
- School of Psychology University of Central Lancashire Preston UK
- College of Health and Life Sciences Brunel University London UK
- Dorset Police Bournemouth UK
- ORCID
- Bate, Sarah
- Venue
- Applied Cognitive Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-02-07
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 828-842
- ISSN
- 0888-4080
- 1099-0720
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
- Funders
- British Academy Mid-Career Fellowship (MD170004)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
