The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
3D Carbonaceous Current Collectors: The Origin of Enhanced Cycling Stability for High‐Sulfur‐Loading Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Abstract
The cycling stability of high‐sulfur‐loading lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries remains a great challenge owing to the exaggerated shuttle problem and interface instability. Despite enormous efforts on design of advanced electrodes and electrolytes, the stability issue raised from current collectors has been rarely concerned. This study demonstrates that rationally designing a 3D carbonaceous macroporous current collector is an efficient and effective “two‐in‐one” strategy to improve the cycling stability of high‐sulfur‐loading Li–S batteries, which is highly versatile to enable various composite cathodes with sulfur loading >3.7 mAh cm−2. The best cycling performance can be achieved upon 950 cycles with a very low decay rate of 0.029%. Moreover, the origin of such a huge enhancement in cycling stability is ascribed to (1) the inhibition of electrochemical corrosion, which severely occurs on the typical Al foil and disables its long‐term sustainability for charge transfer, and (2) the passivation of cathode surface. The role of the chemical resistivity against corrosion and favorable macroscopic porous structure is highlighted for exploiting novel current collectors toward exceptional cycling stability of high‐sulfur‐loading Li–S batteries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Li-O2 and Li-S batteries with high energy storage
Bruce, P. G., Freunberger, S. A., Hardwick, L. J., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2012) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat3191 · Cited by 9,479
Raman spectroscopy of carbon nanotubes
Dresselhaus, M. S., Dresselhaus, G., Saito, R., & Jorio, A. (2005) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2004.10.006 · Cited by 4,499
Xu, Y., Bai, H., Lu, G., Li, C., & Shi, G. (2008) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja800745y · Cited by 3,252
Lithium–Sulfur Batteries: Electrochemistry, Materials, and Prospects
Yin, Y., Xin, S., Guo, Y., & Wan, L. (2013) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201304762 · Cited by 2,707
A new class of Solvent-in-Salt electrolyte for high-energy rechargeable metallic lithium batteries
Suo, L., Hu, Y.-S., Li, H., Armand, M., & Chen, L. (2013) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms2513 · Cited by 2,314
Wei Seh, Z., Li, W., Cha, J. J., Zheng, G., Yang, Y., McDowell, M. T., Hsu, P.-C., & Cui, Y. (2013) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms2327 · Cited by 2,107
Nanostructured sulfur cathodes
Yang, Y., Zheng, G., & Cui, Y. (2013) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c2cs35256g · Cited by 1,947
Lithium–Sulfur Batteries: Progress and Prospects
Manthiram, A., Chung, S., & Zu, C. (2015) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201405115 · Cited by 1,620
Lithium–sulphur batteries with a microporous carbon paper as a bifunctional interlayer
Su, Y.-S., & Manthiram, A. (2012) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms2163 · Cited by 1,458
On the Surface Chemical Aspects of Very High Energy Density, Rechargeable Li–Sulfur Batteries
Aurbach, D., Pollak, E., Elazari, R., Salitra, G., Kelley, C. S., & Affinito, J. (2009) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1.3148721 · Cited by 1,443
Cited by
Review on High‐Loading and High‐Energy Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Peng, H., Huang, J., Cheng, X., & Zhang, Q. (2017) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201700260 · Cited by 1,746
Self-citationCurrent Status and Future Prospects of Metal–Sulfur Batteries
Chung, S., & Manthiram, A. (2019) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201901125 · Cited by 622
Progress on the Critical Parameters for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries to be Practically Viable
Chung, S., Chang, C., & Manthiram, A. (2018) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201801188 · Cited by 477
A review of recent developments in rechargeable lithium–sulfur batteries
Kang, W., Deng, N., Ju, J., Li, Q., Wu, D., Ma, X., Li, L., Naebe, M., & Cheng, B. (2016) · Nanoscale · doi:10.1039/c6nr04923k · Cited by 391
Advanced energy materials for flexible batteries in energy storage: A review
Kong, L., Tang, C., Peng, H., Huang, J., & Zhang, Q. (2020) · SmartMat · doi:10.1002/smm2.1007 · Cited by 316
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Peng, H., Xu, W., Zhu, L., Wang, D., Huang, J., Cheng, X., Yuan, Z., Wei, F., & Zhang, Q.
- Venue
- Advanced Functional Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-06-29
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 35
- Pages
- 6351-6358
- ISSN
- 1616-301X (ISSN-L)
- 1616-3028
- OpenAlex
- W2471358697
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 57
- FWCI
- 22.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 3D Carbonaceous Current Collectors: The Origin of Enhanced Cycling Stability for High‐Sulfur‐Loading Lithium–Sulfur Batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adfm.201602071
- The paper
- Peng, H., Xu, W., Zhu, L., Wang, D., Huang, J., Cheng, X., Yuan, Z., Wei, F., & Zhang, Q. (2016). 3D Carbonaceous Current Collectors: The Origin of Enhanced Cycling Stability for High‐Sulfur‐Loading Lithium–Sulfur Batteries. Advanced Functional Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201602071
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
