The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Functional Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration: A Lesson in Complex Biology
Abstract
Bone is a hard yet dynamic tissue with remarkable healing capacities. Research to date has greatly advanced the understanding of how bone heals and has led to marked success in the treatment of bone injuries. Nevertheless, the effective treatment of nonunions and large bone defects continues to present a challenge for orthopedic surgeons. Biomaterials provide researchers with a powerful instrument to potentially guide effective bone tissue regeneration in challenging healing environments. However, the most appropriate biomaterial for bone tissue engineering continues to be an area of intense debate. Indeed, the mechanical properties of real bone can be reproduced in vitro but the development of a functional bone substitute goes beyond the sole mechanical properties. The faithful reproduction of bone as a functional organ requires the combination of different cell types and temporal regulation of the molecular signaling involved during the different stages of bone formation and regeneration. This is not at all a trivial task. Herein, critical aspects of bone healing/regeneration including mechanical loading, inflammation, vascularization, and innervation are described. The success and the challenges behind the development of biomaterials, and the technologies used to functionalize them, in order to support the underlying cellular mechanisms are also highlighted.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification
Engler, A. J., Sen, S., Sweeney, H. L., & Discher, D. E. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.044 · Cited by 13,915
Exploring the full spectrum of macrophage activation
Mosser, D. M., & Edwards, J. P. (2008) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri2448 · Cited by 9,144
Foreign body reaction to biomaterials
Anderson, J. M., Rodriguez, A., & Chang, D. T. (2008) · Seminars in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.smim.2007.11.004 · Cited by 5,138
Alternative activation of macrophages: mechanism and functions
Gordon, S., & Martinez, F. O. (2010) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2010.05.007 · Cited by 4,197
OPGL is a key regulator of osteoclastogenesis, lymphocyte development and lymph node organogenesis.
Kong, Y.-Y., Yoshida, H., Sarosi, I., Tan, H.-L., Timms, E., Capparelli, C., Morony, S., Oliveira-dos-Santos, A. J., Van, G., Itie, A., et al. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/16852 · Cited by 3,351
Designing materials for biology and medicine
Langer, R., & Tirrell, D. A. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02388 · Cited by 3,198
Sydney Gladman, A., Matsumoto, E. A., Nuzzo, R. G., Mahadevan, L., & Lewis, J. A. (2016) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat4544 · Cited by 3,027
Trk Receptors: Roles in Neuronal Signal Transduction
Huang, E. J., & Reichardt, L. F. (2003) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.72.121801.161629 · Cited by 2,537
Cell-laden microengineered gelatin methacrylate hydrogels
Nichol, J. W., Koshy, S. T., Bae, H., Hwang, C. M., Yamanlar, S., & Khademhosseini, A. (2010) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.03.064 · Cited by 2,377
Effects of substrate stiffness on cell morphology, cytoskeletal structure, and adhesion
Yeung, T., Georges, P. C., Flanagan, L. A., Marg, B., Ortiz, M., Funaki, M., Zahir, N., Ming, W., Weaver, V., & Janmey, P. A. (2005) · Cell Motility and the Cytoskeleton · doi:10.1002/cm.20041 · Cited by 2,325
Cited by
Recent advances in PLGA-based biomaterials for bone tissue regeneration
Jin, S., Xia, X., Huang, J., Yuan, C., Zuo, Y., Li, Y., & Li, J. (2021) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2021.03.067 · Cited by 295
Wang, T., Bai, J., Lu, M., Huang, C., Geng, D., Chen, G., Wang, L., Qi, J., Cui, W., & Deng, L. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-27816-1 · Cited by 221
Design, printing, and engineering of regenerative biomaterials for personalized bone healthcare
Jia, Z., Xu, X., Zhu, D., & Zheng, Y. (2023) · Progress in Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2023.101072 · Cited by 176
Novel approaches and biomaterials for bone tissue engineering: a focus on silk fibroin
Paladini, F., & Pollini, M. (2022) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma15196952 · Cited by 51
The Therapeutic Potential of Hematopoietic Stem Cells in Bone Regeneration
Oliveira, C. S., Carreira, M., Correia, C. R., & Mano, J. F. (2022) · Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews · doi:10.1089/ten.teb.2021.0019 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Armiento, A. R., Hatt, L. P., Sanchez Rosenberg, G., Thompson, K., & Stoddart, M. J.
- Venue
- Advanced Functional Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-02-19
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 44
- ISSN
- 1616-301X (ISSN-L)
- 1616-3028
- OpenAlex
- W3008920109
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 43
- FWCI
- 8.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Functional Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration: A Lesson in Complex Biology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adfm.201909874
- The paper
- Armiento, A. R., Hatt, L. P., Sanchez Rosenberg, G., Thompson, K., & Stoddart, M. J. (2020). Functional Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration: A Lesson in Complex Biology. Advanced Functional Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201909874
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
