Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 272

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bigger is Surprisingly Better: Agglomerates of Larger RuP Nanoparticles Outperform Benchmark Pt Nanocatalysts for the Hydrogen Evolution Reaction

Open access
Yu, Jie, Guo, Yanan, She, Sixuan, Miao, Shuanshuan, Ni, Meng, Zhou, Wei, Liu, Meilin, Shao, Zongping·2018·Advanced Materials

Abstract

Although metallic ruthenium (Ru) is a potential electrocatalyst for the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) to replace platinum (Pt) at a cost of only ≈4% of Pt, the persistent dissolution of Ru under operation conditions remains a challenge. Here, it is reported that agglomerates of large ruthenium phosphide (RuP) particles (L‐RP, ≈32 nm) show outstanding HER performance in pH‐universal electrolytes, which particularly demonstrates a surprisingly higher intrinsic activity and durability than small nanoparticles of RuP (S‐RP, ≈3 nm) or metallic Ru on carbon supports. This is especially true in basic media, achieving electrocatalytic activity comparable to or even outperforming that of Pt/C, as reflected by lower overpotential at 10 mA cm−2, smaller Tafel slope, larger exchange current density, and higher turnover frequency while maintaining 200 h stable operation. Calculations suggest that Δ GH* of RuP is much closer to zero than that of metallic Ru, and phosphorous doping is proven to enhance the rate of proton transfer in HER, contributing in part to the improved activity of RuP. The better performance of L‐RP than that of S‐RP is ascribed largely to the stabilization of the P species due to the lowered surface energy of large particles. Furthermore, the relatively low‐cost materials and facile synthesis make L‐RP/C a highly attractive next‐generation HER electrocatalyst.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/adma.201800047

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. 10.1039/C5CS00434A · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1126/science.1103197 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.036 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1007/s40843-016-0127-9 · DOI
  5. 10.1038/nature16530 · DOI
  6. 10.1002/adma.201600005 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1038/ncomms14969 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1002/smtd.201800071 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1038/ncomms6982 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1021/jacs.6b09351 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1002/aenm.201602122 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1007/s12274-016-1359-4 · DOI
  13. 10.1149/2.0501414jes · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1002/aenm.201602355 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1002/anie.201506480 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1039/C4EE00440J · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1021/acsenergylett.6b00532 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1021/acscatal.5b02730 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1021/acsami.6b10436 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1016/j.cattod.2015.08.014 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1021/acscatal.5b00880 · DOI
  22. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b03446 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1021/acscatal.5b02076 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1002/adma.201505855 · DOI
  25. 10.1021/acsnano.7b03290 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1039/C4EE02940B · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1039/C5TA00139K · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1002/adfm.201505626 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1021/jacs.7b01530 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1039/C6TA06975D · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1039/C5NR08763E · DOI
  32. 10.1039/C4EE00957F · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1039/C4CC05936K · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b03332 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Tang C., 2017, Adv. Mater., 29, 160244
  36. 10.1039/C7CC06278H · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1103/PhysRevB.44.7888 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Philipsen P. H. T., BAND2017, SCM, Theoretical Chemistry
  39. 10.1021/jacs.7b01376 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1021/acscatal.7b00587 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b01504 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1002/sia.740151011 · DOI

Cited by

See all 272

Metadata

Authors
Yu, J., Guo, Y., She, S., Miao, S., Ni, M., Zhou, W., Liu, M., & Shao, Z.
Venue
Advanced Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-08-21
Volume
30
Issue
39
Pages
e1800047-e1800047
ISSN
  • 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-4095
OpenAlex
W2888057071
Cited by
272
References
13
FWCI
7.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (21576135)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bigger is Surprisingly Better: Agglomerates of Larger RuP Nanoparticles Outperform Benchmark Pt Nanocatalysts for the Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adma.201800047
The paper
Yu, J., Guo, Y., She, S., Miao, S., Ni, M., Zhou, W., Liu, M., & Shao, Z. (2018). Bigger is Surprisingly Better: Agglomerates of Larger RuP Nanoparticles Outperform Benchmark Pt Nanocatalysts for the Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. Advanced Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201800047

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.