Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 269

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Surface Reconstruction Route to High Productivity and Selectivity in CO2 Electroreduction toward C2+ Hydrocarbons

Kibria, Md Golam, Dinh, Cao‐Thang, Seifitokaldani, Ali, De Luna, Phil, Burdyny, Thomas, Quintero‐Bermudez, Rafael, Ross, Michael B., Bushuyev, Oleksandr S., García de Arquer, F. Pelayo, Yang, Peidong, Sinton, David, Sargent, Edward H.·2018·Advanced Materials

Abstract

Electrochemical carbon dioxide reduction (CO 2) is a promising technology to use renewable electricity to convert CO 2 into valuable carbon‐based products. For commercial‐scale applications, however, the productivity and selectivity toward multi‐carbon products must be enhanced. A facile surface reconstruction approach that enables tuning of CO 2‐reduction selectivity toward C 2+ products on a copper‐chloride (CuCl)‐derived catalyst is reported here. Using a novel wet‐oxidation process, both the oxidation state and morphology of Cu surface are controlled, providing uniformity of the electrode morphology and abundant surface active sites. The Cu surface is partially oxidized to form an initial Cu (I) chloride layer which is subsequently converted to a Cu (I) oxide surface. High C 2+ selectivity on these catalysts are demonstrated in an H‐cell configuration, in which 73% Faradaic efficiency (FE) for C 2+ products is reached with 56% FE for ethylene (C 2 H 4) and overall current density of 17 mA cm‐2. Thereafter, the method into a flow‐cell configuration is translated, which allows operation in a highly alkaline medium for complete suppression of CH 4 production. A record C 2+ FE of ≈84% and a half‐cell power conversion efficiency of 50% at a partial current density of 336 mA cm‐2 using the reconstructed Cu catalyst are reported.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/adma.201804867

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Cited by

See all 269

Metadata

Authors
Kibria, M. G., Dinh, C., Seifitokaldani, A., De Luna, P., Burdyny, T., Quintero‐Bermudez, R., Ross, M. B., Bushuyev, O. S., García de Arquer, F. P., Yang, P., Sinton, D., & Sargent, E. H.
Venue
Advanced Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-10-09
Volume
30
Issue
49
Pages
e1804867-e1804867
ISSN
  • 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-4095
OpenAlex
W2896508033
Cited by
269
References
17
FWCI
6.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Surface Reconstruction Route to High Productivity and Selectivity in CO2 Electroreduction toward C2+ Hydrocarbons. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adma.201804867
The paper
Kibria, M. G., Dinh, C., Seifitokaldani, A., De Luna, P., Burdyny, T., Quintero‐Bermudez, R., Ross, M. B., Bushuyev, O. S., García de Arquer, F. P., Yang, P., Sinton, D., & Sargent, E. H. (2018). A Surface Reconstruction Route to High Productivity and Selectivity in CO2 Electroreduction toward C2+ Hydrocarbons. Advanced Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201804867

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.