The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mechanically Robust, Elastic, and Healable Ionogels for Highly Sensitive Ultra‐Durable Ionic Skins
Abstract
The fabrication of highly durable skin‐mimicking sensors remains challenging because of the unavoidable fatigue and physical damage that sensors are subjected to in practical applications. In this study, ultra‐durable ionic skins (I‐skins) with excellent healability and high sensitivity are fabricated by impregnating ionic liquids (ILs) into a mechanically robust poly(urea‐urethane) (PU) network. The PU network is composed of crystallized poly(ε‐caprolactone) and flexible poly(ethylene glycol) that are dynamically cross‐linked with hindered urea bonds and hydrogen bonds. Such a design endows the resultant ionogels with high mechanical strength, good elasticity, Young's modulus similar to that of natural skin, and excellent healability. The ionogel‐based I‐skins exhibit a high sensitivity to a wide range of strains (0.1–300%) and pressures (0.1–20 kPa). Importantly, the I‐skins show a highly reproducible electrical response over 10 000 uninterrupted strain cycles. The sensing performance of the I‐skins stored in open air for 200 days is almost the same as that of the freshly prepared I‐skin. The fractured I‐skins can be easily healed by heating at 65 °C that restores their original ultra‐durable sensing performance. The long‐term durability of the I‐skins is attributed to the combination of non‐volatility of the ILs, excellent healability, and well‐designed mechanical properties.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kim, D.-H., Lu, N., Ma, R., Kim, Y.-S., Kim, R.-H., Wang, S., Wu, J., Won, S. M., Tao, H., Islam, A., et al. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1206157 · Cited by 4,836
Stretchable, Skin-Mountable, and Wearable Strain Sensors and Their Potential Applications: A Review
Amjadi, M., Kyung, K., Park, I., & Sitti, M. (2016) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201504755 · Cited by 3,202
Hammock, M. L., Chortos, A., Tee, B. C. ‐., Tok, J. B. ‐., & Bao, Z. (2013) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201302240 · Cited by 2,396
Stretchable silicon nanoribbon electronics for skin prosthesis
Kim, J., Lee, M., Shim, H. J., Ghaffari, R., Cho, H. R., Son, D., Jung, Y. H., Soh, M., Choi, C., Jung, S., et al. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms6747 · Cited by 1,435
Liu, Y., Li, Y., Yang, G., Zheng, X., & Zhou, S. (2015) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/am5081056 · Cited by 214
Cited by
Recyclable, Healable, and Tough Ionogels Insensitive to Crack Propagation
Li, W., Li, L., Zheng, S., Liu, Z., Zou, X., Sun, Z., Guo, J., & Yan, F. (2022) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202203049 · Cited by 280
Xiang, H., Li, X., Wu, B., Sun, S., & Wu, P. (2023) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202209581 · Cited by 268
Flexible Plasmonic Biosensors for Healthcare Monitoring: Progress and Prospects
Song, L., Chen, J., Xu, B. B., & Huang, Y. (2021) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.1c07176 · Cited by 186
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, T., Wang, Y., Li, S., Liu, X., & Sun, J.
- Venue
- Advanced Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-06-26
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 32
- Pages
- e2002706-e2002706
- ISSN
- 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-4095
- OpenAlex
- W3037199682
- Cited by
- 500
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 22.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mechanically Robust, Elastic, and Healable Ionogels for Highly Sensitive Ultra‐Durable Ionic Skins. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adma.202002706
- The paper
- Li, T., Wang, Y., Li, S., Liu, X., & Sun, J. (2020). Mechanically Robust, Elastic, and Healable Ionogels for Highly Sensitive Ultra‐Durable Ionic Skins. Advanced Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202002706
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.