Cited by 54Down syndrome and intellectual disability researchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Pharmacological interventions to improve cognition and adaptive functioning in down syndrome: strides to date.

Hart, Sarah J., Visootsak, Jeannie, Tamburri, Paul, Phuong, Patrick, Baumer, Nicole, Hernandez, Maria‐Clemencia, Skotko, Brian G., Ochoa‐Lubinoff, Cesar +3 more·2017·American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A

Abstract

Although an increasing number of clinical trials have been developed for cognition in Down syndrome, there has been limited success to date in identifying effective interventions. This review describes the progression from pre-clinical studies with mouse models to human clinical trials research using pharmacological interventions to improve cognition and adaptive functioning in Down syndrome. We also provide considerations for investigators when conducting human clinical trials and describe strategies for the pharmaceutical industry to advance the field in drug discovery for Down syndrome. Future research focusing on earlier pharmaceutical interventions, development of appropriate outcome measures, and greater collaboration between industry, academia, advocacy, and regulatory groups will be important for addressing limitations from prior studies and developing potential effective interventions for cognition in Down syndrome.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ajmg.a.38465

Cites

110 of 110 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pharmaceutical interventions translating these findings back into humans have not been successful.

    “However, translating these findings back into humans in the form of pharmaceutical interventions has yet to prove successful (Hart et al., 2017).”

    From Neurodevelopment in Down syndrome: Concordance in humans and models (2022) · cites this paper as Hart et al., 2017

  • None of the clinical trials of GABA antagonists have resulted in an improvement in cognition in people with Down syndrome.

    “none of these trials have resulted in an improvement.”

    From Neurodevelopment in Down syndrome: Concordance in humans and models (2022) · cites this paper as Hart et al., 2017

  • Several clinical trials have tested the effect of GABA antagonists on cognition in people with Down syndrome.

    “several different clinical trials have tested the effect of GABA antagonists on cognition in people with DS (Hart et al., 2017)”

    From Neurodevelopment in Down syndrome: Concordance in humans and models (2022) · cites this paper as Hart et al., 2017

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 111 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hart, S. J., Visootsak, J., Tamburri, P., Phuong, P., Baumer, N., Hernandez, M., Skotko, B. G., Ochoa‐Lubinoff, C., Liogier D'Ardhuy, X., Kishnani, P. S., & Spiridigliozzi, G. A.
Affiliations
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
  • F. Hoffmann‐La Roche Roche Pharma Research and Early Development Neuroscience, Roche Innovation Center New York New York New York
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
  • F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG (CH)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Rush University Medical Center (US)
  • F. Hoffmann‐La Roche Roche Pharma Research and Early Development Neuroscience, Roche Innovation Center Basel Basel Switzerland
Corresponding author
Hart, Sarah J.
Venue
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-09-08
Volume
173
Issue
11
Pages
3029-3041
ISSN
  • 1552-4825 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4833
OpenAlex
W2751709943
Cited by
54
References
111
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
Down syndrome, pharmacological interventions, cognitive impairment, adaptive behavior, mouse model, clinical trials, drug discovery, outcome measures, pharmaceutical industry collaboration
MeSH terms
Animals, Cognition, Down Syndrome, Humans, Mice, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review