Cited by 913Down syndrome and intellectual disability researchGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersWilliams Syndrome Research

A mouse model for Down syndrome exhibits learning and behaviour deficits

Reeves, Roger H., Irving, Nicholas G., Moran, Timothy H., Wohn, Anny, Kitt, Cheryl, Sisodia, Sangram S., Schmidt, Cecilia, Bronson, Roderick T. +1 more·1995·Nature Genetics

Abstract

Trisomy 21 or Down syndrome (DS) is the most frequent genetic cause of mental retardation, affecting one in 800 live born human beings. Mice with segmental trisomy 16 (Ts65Dn mice) are at dosage imbalance for genes corresponding to those on human chromosome 21q21-22.3--which includes the so-called DS 'critical region'. They do not show early-onset of Alzheimer disease pathology; however, Ts65Dn mice do demonstrate impaired performance in a complex learning task requiring the integration of visual and spatial information. The reproducibility of this phenotype among Ts65Dn mice indicates that dosage imbalance for a gene or genes in this region contributes to this impairment. The corresponding dosage imbalance for the human homologues of these genes may contribute to cognitive deficits in DS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ng1095-177

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ts65Dn and Ts1Cje mice survive to adulthood and exhibit morphological, biochemical, and transcriptional changes seen in human DS.

    “Two segmental trisomy mouse models of DS, Ts65Dn (Davisson et al., 1990), and Ts1Cje (Sago et al., 1998) mice, survive to adulthood and exhibit a number of the morphological, biochemical, and transcriptional changes seen in the human disease (Davisson et al., 1990;Reeves et al., 1995;Holtzman et al., 1996).”
  • Ts65Dn mice with a segmental trisomy extending from App to Mx1 exhibit behavioral and cognitive abnormalities not unlike some abnormalities seen in individuals with DS.

    “Ts65Dn mice with a segmental trisomy extending from App to Mx1 exhibit behavioral and cognitive abnormalities not unlike some of the abnormalities seen in individuals with DS (Reeves et al., 1995).”
  • The Ts65Dn DS mouse model offers a third copy of approximately half of the Hsa21 orthologs on a freely segregating extra marker chromosome.

    “The Ts65Dn DS mouse model has been widely used and offers a third copy of approximately half of the Hsa21 orthologs on a freely segregating extra marker chromosome (Reeves et al., 1995).”
  • Ts65Dn mice are one of many DS mouse models and have been the primary model used in DS preclinical neurobiological and neuro-behavioral research, including extensive use in testing therapies designed to normalize DS phenotypes.

    “Ts65Dn mice are one of many DS mouse models and have been the primary model used in DS preclinical neurobiological and neuro-behavioral research, including extensive use in testing therapies designed to normalize DS phenotypes (Garcia-Cerro et al., 2017; Gardiner, 2015; Reeves et al., 1995).”
  • Behaviorally, Ts65Dn appears to capture many of the features of Down syndrome including developmental delays and learning and memory deficits.

    “Behaviorally, Ts65Dn appears to capture many of the features of DS including developmental delays and learning and memory deficits (Reeves et al., 1995; Olmos-Serrano et al., 2016b; Shaw et al., 2020).”

    From Neurodevelopment in Down syndrome: Concordance in humans and models (2022) · cites this paper as Reeves et al., 1995

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reeves, R. H., Irving, N. G., Moran, T. H., Wohn, A., Kitt, C., Sisodia, S. S., Schmidt, C., Bronson, R. T., & Davisson, M. T.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Jackson Laboratory (US)
Venue
Nature Genetics
Published
1995-10
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
177-184
ISSN
  • 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1718
OpenAlex
W2084233122
Cited by
913
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 46
FWCI
29.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (n01hd013131-004, 2r01hg000405-07a1)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (HG 00405)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD-24605, HD13131, P01HD024605)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Williams Syndrome Research
Keywords
Down syndrome, Ts65Dn mouse model, mouse model, learning deficits, spatial learning, cognitive impairment, intellectual disability, dosage imbalance, Alzheimer's disease
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Analysis of Variance, Animals, Chromosome Mapping, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 21, Disease Models, Animal, Down Syndrome, Female, Humans, Learning, Male, Mice, Inbred C3H, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Neurologic Mutants, Motor Activity, Sex Characteristics, Gene Expression, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review