Cited by 218Forensic and Genetic ResearchGenetic diversity and population structureRace, Genetics, and Society

Gene admixture in human populations: Models and predictions

Chakraborty, Ranajit·1986·American Journal of Physical Anthropology

Abstract

Brief accounts of methods for estimating proportions of admixture in populations and individuals of hybrid origin are presented with the objective of appraising their underlying assumptions. In view of the uncertainties introduced by assumptions under which admixture estimates are obtained, it is concluded that the reliability of estimates derived from different methods cannot be formally compared. With examples from several admixed populations, it is shown that all methods do not necessarily give discordant results when identical data are used to obtain admixture estimates. Even though past experiences using admixed populations to detect selection or to understand disease etiology have not been very successful, it is believed that admixed human populations can be regarded as a natural experiment. Hence, they are suitable for microevolutionary and epidemiological studies. The proper identification of ancestral populations and the degree of asymmetry in gene flow (sex-biased admixture) are important issues in admixture studies. These aspects can be examined in the statistical properties of allele frequency distributions, but corroboration of particular models should be made from in-depth investigations of historical demography and social structure of admixed populations. Future studies of admixture with DNA polymorphism data may resolve some of the uncertainties associated with current techniques of detecting genetic polymorphisms. Because of the abundance of genetic data, it…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ajpa.1330290502

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The paper's estimates of mean African ancestry in 23andMe African Americans are 73% or 75%, unlike previous estimates that typically ranged from 77% to 93%.

    “Unlike previous estimates of the mean proportion of African ancestry, which typically have ranged from 77% to 93% African ancestry,2–4,48–62 our estimates, depending on exclusions, are 73% or 75%.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chakraborty, R.
Corresponding author
Chakraborty, Ranajit
Venue
American Journal of Physical Anthropology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1986
Volume
29
Issue
S7
Pages
1-43
ISSN
  • 0002-9483 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-8644
OpenAlex
W2044375939
Cited by
218
References
2
Citations by year
2024: 31 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Journal of Physical Anthropology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Race, Genetics, and Society
Keywords
admixed populations, ancestry proportions, allele frequency distribution, sex-biased admixture, ancestral populations, natural experiment, etiology, selection detection, DNA polymorphism, morphological characters, historical demography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review