Gene admixture in human populations: Models and predictions
Abstract
Brief accounts of methods for estimating proportions of admixture in populations and individuals of hybrid origin are presented with the objective of appraising their underlying assumptions. In view of the uncertainties introduced by assumptions under which admixture estimates are obtained, it is concluded that the reliability of estimates derived from different methods cannot be formally compared. With examples from several admixed populations, it is shown that all methods do not necessarily give discordant results when identical data are used to obtain admixture estimates. Even though past experiences using admixed populations to detect selection or to understand disease etiology have not been very successful, it is believed that admixed human populations can be regarded as a natural experiment. Hence, they are suitable for microevolutionary and epidemiological studies. The proper identification of ancestral populations and the degree of asymmetry in gene flow (sex-biased admixture) are important issues in admixture studies. These aspects can be examined in the statistical properties of allele frequency distributions, but corroboration of particular models should be made from in-depth investigations of historical demography and social structure of admixed populations. Future studies of admixture with DNA polymorphism data may resolve some of the uncertainties associated with current techniques of detecting genetic polymorphisms. Because of the abundance of genetic data, it…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The paper's estimates of mean African ancestry in 23andMe African Americans are 73% or 75%, unlike previous estimates that typically ranged from 77% to 93%.
“Unlike previous estimates of the mean proportion of African ancestry, which typically have ranged from 77% to 93% African ancestry,2–4,48–62 our estimates, depending on exclusions, are 73% or 75%.”
From The genetic ancestry of African Americans, Latinos, and European Americans across the United States (2015) · cites this paper as [54]
Cites
How Much Can We Boost IQ and Scholastic Achievement
Jensen, A. (1969) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/haer.39.1.l3u15956627424k7 · Cited by 2,907 · see citing works
Reed, T. E. (1969) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.165.3895.762 · Cited by 319 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Estimating African American Admixture Proportions by Use of Population-Specific Alleles
Parra, E. J., Marcini, A., Akey, J., Martinson, J., Batzer, M. A., Cooper, R., Forrester, T., Allison, D. B., Deka, R., Ferrell, R. E., et al. (1998) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/302148 · Cited by 771 · see citing works
“Stephens et al. (1994) and Briscoe et al. (1994) further extended the work of Chakraborty and Weiss 1988, using computer simulations, and introduced the acronym " MALD " (mapping by admixture linkage disequilibrium ) to designate this method.”
MethodThe genetic ancestry of African Americans, Latinos, and European Americans across the United States
Bryc, K., Durand, E. Y., Macpherson, J. M., Reich, D., & Mountain, J. L. (2015) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.11.010 · Cited by 712 · see citing works
Evidence for archaic adaptive introgression in humans
Racimo, F., Sankararaman, S., Nielsen, R., & Huerta-Sánchez, E. (2015) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3936 · Cited by 521 · see citing works
Y genetic data support the Neolithic demic diffusion model
Chikhi, L., Nichols, R. A., Barbujani, G., & Beaumont, M. A. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.162158799 · Cited by 327 · see citing works
Halder, I., Shriver, M., Thomas, M., Fernandez, J. R., & Frudakis, T. (2008) · Human Mutation · doi:10.1002/humu.20695 · Cited by 274 · see citing works
Williams, R. C., Long, J. C., Hanson, R. L., Sievers, M. L., & Knowler, W. C. (2000) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/302773 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Wilson, M. J., Lopez, M., Vargas, M., Julian, C., Tellez, W., Rodriguez, A., Bigham, A., Armaza, J. F., Niermeyer, S., Shriver, M., et al. (2007) · American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00806.2006 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Measuring and using admixture to study the genetics of complex diseases
Halder, I., & Shriver, M. D. (2003) · Human Genomics · doi:10.1186/1479-7364-1-1-52 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Admixture analysis of a rural population of the state of Guerrero, Mexico
Bonilla, C., Gutiérrez, G., Parra, E. J., Kline, C., & Shriver, M. D. (2005) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.20227 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
- Authors
- Chakraborty, R.
- Corresponding author
- Chakraborty, Ranajit
- ORCID
- Chakraborty, Ranajit
- Venue
- American Journal of Physical Anthropology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1986
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- S7
- Pages
- 1-43
- ISSN
- 0002-9483 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-8644
- OpenAlex
- W2044375939
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2024: 31 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 1.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Physical Anthropology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Race, Genetics, and Society
- Keywords
- admixed populations, ancestry proportions, allele frequency distribution, sex-biased admixture, ancestral populations, natural experiment, etiology, selection detection, DNA polymorphism, morphological characters, historical demography
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review