Cited by 521Pleistocene-Era Hominins and ArchaeologyForensic and Genetic ResearchGenetic diversity and population structure

Evidence for archaic adaptive introgression in humans

Open access
Racimo, Fernando, Sankararaman, Sriram, Nielsen, Rasmus, Huerta-Sánchez, Emilia·2015·Nature Reviews Genetics

Abstract

As modern and ancient DNA sequence data from diverse human populations accumulate, evidence is increasing in support of the existence of beneficial variants acquired from archaic humans that may have accelerated adaptation and improved survival in new environments - a process known as adaptive introgression. Within the past few years, a series of studies have identified genomic regions that show strong evidence for archaic adaptive introgression. Here, we provide an overview of the statistical methods developed to identify archaic introgressed fragments in the genome sequences of modern humans and to determine whether positive selection has acted on these fragments. We review recently reported examples of adaptive introgression, grouped by selection pressure, and consider the level of supporting evidence for each. Finally, we discuss challenges and recommendations for inferring selection on introgressed regions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrg3936

Cites

99 of 99 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Papuans and Indigenous Australians carry the largest amount of Denisovan introgression (~1% to 5%), followed by East and South Asians (~0.06% to 0.5%), and Indigenous Americans (~0.05% to 0.4%).

    “It has been shown that Papuans and Indigenous Australians carry the largest amount of Denisovan introgression (∼1% to 5%), followed by East and South Asians (∼0.06% to 0.5%), and Indigenous Americans (∼0.05% to 0.4%) (Reich et al. 2010; Racimo et al. 2015; Mallick et al. 2016; Sankararaman et al. 2016; Browning et al. 2018).”

    From The Human Accelerated Region HAR202 Controls <i>NPAS3</i> Expression in the Developing Forebrain Displaying Differential Enhancer Activity Between Modern and Archaic Human Sequences (2024) · cites this paper as Racimo et al. 2015

    The Introduction’s “Archaic gene flow” section reports 3–6% Denisovan ancestry in Melanesians, Papuans and Australians, versus about 0.2% in East Asians, supporting the broad ordering but not the quoted 1–5% range. It does not provide the claimed ranges for South Asians or Indigenous Americans. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Most archaic ancestry in AMH was subject to strong negative selection, but some introgressed alleles remaining in AMH populations show evidence of adaptation.

    “Most of the archaic ancestry in AMH was subject to strong negative selection, but some of these introgressed alleles remaining in AMH populations show evidence of adaptation (Racimo et al. 2015; Gower et al. 2021).”

    From Archaic Introgression Shaped Human Circadian Traits (2023) · cites this paper as Racimo et al. 2015

    The Genome-wide admixture maps section reports signatures of negative selection pushing introgressed variants to low frequencies, alongside considerable evidence of adaptive introgression. It does not establish that most archaic ancestry was subject to strong negative selection; that extent and strength overstate what this passage says. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Archaic alleles have been associated with differences in hemoglobin levels at higher altitude in Tibetans, immune resistance to new pathogens, levels of skin pigmentation, and fat composition.

    “For example, archaic alleles have been associated with differences in hemoglobin levels at higher altitude in Tibetans, immune resistance to new pathogens, levels of skin pigmentation, and fat composition (Huerta-Sánchez et al. 2014; Racimo et al. 2015; Racimo, Gokhman, et al. 2017; Dannemann and Kelso 2017; Racimo, Marnetto, and Huerta-Sánchez 2017; McArthur et al. 2021).”

    From Archaic Introgression Shaped Human Circadian Traits (2023) · cites this paper as Racimo et al. 2015

    The Altitude and Genotype-phenotype associations sections report that introgressed EPAS1 variants in Tibetans are associated with hemoglobin levels; the Pigmentation section reports an association between a BNC2 SNP and skin pigmentation. The Defense against pathogens section discusses introgressed immune-gene haplotypes but does not establish resistance to new pathogens. The Metabolism section reports differences in brain lipid concentrations alongside evidence concerning Neanderthal-like lipid-catabolism genes, rather than a direct association between archaic alleles and fat composition (page numbers unavailable in our copy). (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Most genetic variation introduced by introgression experienced strong negative selection in AMH, while a smaller portion is thought to have provided adaptive benefits in new environments.

    “While most of this genetic variation experienced strong negative selection in AMH, a smaller portion is thought to have provided adaptive benefits in the new environments (Racimo et al. 2015).”

    From Archaic Introgression Shaped Human Circadian Traits (2023) · cites this paper as Racimo et al. 2015

    The Genome-wide admixture maps section reports negative selection pushing introgressed variants to low frequencies alongside evidence of adaptive introgression. The Conclusions say adaptive introgression helped humans adapt to new environmental conditions. Neither passage establishes that most introduced variation experienced strong negative selection or quantifies the adaptive portion as smaller. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Evidence in favor of hybridization between Neanderthals and modern humans has accumulated during the past decade.

    “Evidence in favor of hybridization has accumulated during the past decade (4–6).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [21]Hawks J Cochran G Dynamics of adaptive introgression from archaic to modern humans PaleoAnthropology 101–115 2006 A visionary review that proposed adaptive introgression as a mode of adaptation in humans, before the availability of archaic genome sequences

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Racimo, F., Sankararaman, S., Nielsen, R., & Huerta-Sánchez, E.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Venue
Nature Reviews Genetics
Published
2015-05-12
Volume
16
Issue
6
Pages
359-371
ISSN
  • 1471-0056 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0064
OpenAlex
W1558762228
Cited by
521
References
99
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 62 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 10
FWCI
73.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (R01HG003229)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM040282, K99GM111744, R01‑GM40282)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
Keywords
Neanderthal introgression, Denisovan introgression, positive selection, ancient DNA, selection inference, human evolution
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Biological, Animals, Haplotypes, Humans, Markov Chains, Models, Genetic, Phylogeny, Selection, Genetic, Linkage Disequilibrium, Genome, Human, Evolution, Molecular, Gene Flow, Neanderthals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review