Cited by 112Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyForensic and Genetic ResearchRace, Genetics, and Society

Individual Estimates of European Genetic Admixture Associated with Lower Body-Mass Index, Plasma Glucose, and Prevalence of Type 2 Diabetes in Pima Indians

Open access
Williams, Robert C., Long, Jeffrey C., Hanson, Robert L., Sievers, Maurice L., Knowler, William C.·2000·The American Journal of Human Genetics

Abstract

Individual genetic admixture estimates (IA) from European Americans (EAs) were computed in 7,996 members of the Gila River Indian Community (Arizona). Parental populations for the analysis were European Americans and full-heritage Pima Indians. A logistic regression was performed on 7,796 persons, to assess association of IA with type 2 diabetes. The odds ratio, comparing diabetes risk in full-heritage EAs with full-heritage Pima Indians, was 0.329 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.225-0.482). Proportional-hazards analysis was performed on 5,482 persons who were nondiabetic at their first examination and 1,215 subjects who developed diabetes during the study. The hazard risk ratio for IA was 0.455 (95% CI 0.301-0.688). Nondiabetic persons had significantly more European IA. In nondiabetic Pimans, multivariate linear regressions of quantitative predictors of type 2 diabetes mellitus, including fasting plasma glucose, 2-h post-load plasma glucose, and body-mass index, showed significant inverse relations with IA when controlled for sex and age. These results illustrate the ongoing evolution of populations by the mechanism of gene flow and its effect on disease risk in the groups with admixture. When the two parental populations differ in disease prevalence, higher or lower risk is associated with admixture, depending on the origin of the admixed alleles and the relative magnitude of the disease prevalence in the parental populations. These data also illustrate the strong genetic components in type 2 diabetes and are consistent with one susceptibility locus common to obesity and diabetes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/302773

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Admixture studies generally find that admixture relates to the trait under investigation above and beyond covariates.

    “These studies generally find that admixture relates to the trait under investigation above and beyond covariates.”

    From Global Ancestry and Cognitive Ability (2019) · cites this paper as [38]

    The Results report that genetic admixture was associated with glucose and BMI among nondiabetic Pima Indians in models adjusted for age and sex; they found no significant association for those traits in the diabetic group. The paper supports this study as an example, but its findings do not establish that admixture studies generally find associations beyond covariates. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Tills D, Kopec AC, Tills RE (1983) The distribution of the human blood groups and other polymorphisms, supplement 1. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Williams, R. C., Long, J. C., Hanson, R. L., Sievers, M. L., & Knowler, W. C.
Affiliations
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (US)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (US)
Corresponding author
Williams, Robert C.
Venue
The American Journal of Human Genetics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-02
Volume
66
Issue
2
Pages
527-538
ISSN
0002-9297 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2074697500
Cited by
112
References
39
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The American Journal of Human Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Race, Genetics, and Society
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, Pima Indians, Gila River Indian Community, body mass index, fasting blood glucose, gene flow, disease susceptibility, obesity, diabetes risk, admixture mapping
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Alleles, Blood Glucose, Child, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Europe, Fasting, Female, Gene Frequency, Humans, Indians, North American, Male, Obesity, Sex Factors, Genetic Variation, Body Mass Index, Prevalence, Logistic Models, Proportional Hazards Models, Odds Ratio, Genetic Predisposition to Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review