Cited by 46

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ontogenetic and static allometry in the human face: Contrasting Khoisan and Inuit

Freidline, Sarah E., Gunz, Philipp, Hublin, Jean‐Jacques·2015·American Journal of Physical Anthropology

Abstract

Objectives: Regional differences in modern human facial features are present at birth, and ontogenetic allometry contributes to variation in adults. However, details regarding differential rates of growth and timing among regional groups are lacking. We explore ontogenetic and static allometry in a cross‐sectional sample spanning Africa, Europe and North America, and evaluate tempo and mode in two regional groups with very different adult facial morphology, the Khoisan and Inuit. Materials and Methods: Semilandmark geometric morphometric methods, multivariate statistics and growth simulations were used to quantify and compare patterns of facial growth and development. Results: Regional‐specific facial morphology develops early in ontogeny. The Inuit has the most distinct morphology and exhibits heterochronic differences in development compared to other regional groups. Allometric patterns differ during early postnatal development, when significant increases in size are coupled with large amounts of shape changes. All regional groups share a common adult static allometric trajectory, which can be attributed to sexual dimorphism, and the corresponding allometric shape changes resemble developmental patterns during later ontogeny. Discussion: The amount and pattern of growth and development may not be shared between regional groups, indicating that a certain degree of flexibility is allowed for in order to achieve adult size. In early postnatal development the face is less constrained compared to other parts of the cranium allowing for greater evolvability. The early development of region‐specific facial features combined with heterochronic differences in timing or rate of growth, reflected in differences in facial size, suggest different patterns of postnatal growth. Am J Phys Anthropol 158:116–131, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ajpa.22759

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 105

  1. 10.1002/ar.10119 · DOI
  2. 10.1017/S0094837300006588 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.jhevol.2009.09.003 · DOI
  4. Bastir M, 2008, A systems‐model for the morphological analysis of integration and modularity in human craniofacial evolution, J Anthropol Sci, 86, 37
  5. 10.1002/ajpa.21596 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.jhevol.2004.08.009 · DOI
  7. 10.1002/ajpa.20191 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2006.00644.x · DOI
  9. 10.1080/03014467900003371 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/S0002-9416(72)90277-1 · DOI
  11. 10.1002/ajpa.20317 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1002/ajpa.1330610312 · DOI
  13. 10.1002/ajpa.1330560312 · DOI
  14. 10.1002/ajpa.1330590204 · DOI
  15. 10.1002/jez.b.21005 · DOI
  16. 10.1086/404940 · DOI
  17. 10.1002/ajpa.21485 · DOI
  18. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199704)102:4<545::AID-AJPA8>3.0.CO;2-Q · DOI
  19. Dryden IL, 1998, Statistical shape analysis
  20. Enlow DH., 1990, Facial growth
  21. Enlow DH, 2008, Essentials of facial growth
  22. 10.1002/ajpa.1330750409 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.jhevol.2012.08.002 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.jhevol.2013.07.012 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1016/j.jhevol.2011.11.005 · DOI
  26. Froment A, 1992, Correspondence between anatomical differentiation and geographic distribution of modern humans studied by craniometry, CR Acad Des Sci Serie III Sci La Vie‐Life Sci, 315, 323
  27. 10.1111/ede.12025 · DOI
  28. 10.1002/jez.b.21430 · DOI
  29. 10.1002/ajpa.21231 · DOI
  30. 10.1007/978-1-4757-3235-1 · DOI
  31. 10.1111/j.1469-185X.1966.tb01624.x · DOI · Paper page
  32. Gould SJ, 1975, Allometry in primates, with emphasis on scaling and the evolution of the brain, Contrib Primatol, 5, 244
  33. Gould SJ., 1977, Ontogeny and phylogeny
  34. 10.1016/j.jhevol.2010.02.007 · DOI
  35. Gunz P., 2005, Statistical and geometric reconstruction of hominid crania: reconstructing australopithecine ontogeny
  36. 10.1073/pnas.0808160106 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.jhevol.2006.08.010 · DOI
  38. 10.1007/0-387-27614-9_3 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/j.jhevol.2009.04.004 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/j.jhevol.2011.11.013 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1016/j.cub.2010.10.018 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1002/ajhb.20122 · DOI
  43. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199603)99:3<389::AID-AJPA3>3.0.CO;2-S · DOI
  44. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(200001)111:1<105::AID-AJPA7>3.0.CO;2-O · DOI
  45. 10.1016/j.jhevol.2010.06.005 · DOI
  46. 10.1002/ajpa.10005 · DOI
  47. 10.1002/ajpa.22402 · DOI
  48. Howells WW., 1973, Cranial variation in man: a study by multivariate analysis of patterns of differences among recent human populations
  49. Howells WW., 1989, Skull shapes and the map, 79
  50. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199801)105:1<57::AID-AJPA6>3.0.CO;2-A · DOI
  51. 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2004.00250.x · DOI
  52. 10.1210/en.2008-0981 · DOI
  53. 10.1111/j.1469-185X.1997.tb00026.x · DOI
  54. 10.1086/285430 · DOI
  55. 10.1017/CBO9780511542565.013 · DOI
  56. 10.1006/jhev.1996.0056 · DOI
  57. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199610)101:2<217::AID-AJPA7>3.0.CO;2-Z · DOI
  58. 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2008.00900.x · DOI
  59. 10.1073/pnas.022440799 · DOI · Paper page
  60. 10.1006/jhev.1998.0287 · DOI
  61. 10.1002/1096-8644(2000)43:31 <117::AID-AJPA5>3.3.CO;2-9 · DOI
  62. 10.1002/ajpa.1330810108 · DOI
  63. Lynch JM, 1996, Geometric morphometrics in primatology: craniofacial variation in homo sapiens and pan troglodytes, Folia Primatol (Basel), 67, 15, 10.1159/000157203 · DOI
  64. Maddux SD., 2011, A quantitative assessment of infraorbital morphology in Homo: testing for character independence and evolutionary significance in the human midface, 10.17077/etd.zc7140w7 · DOI
  65. 10.1016/j.jhevol.2008.10.003 · DOI · Paper page
  66. 10.1210/en.2004-0665 · DOI
  67. 10.1111/joa.12075 · DOI
  68. 10.1016/j.jhevol.2007.05.013 · DOI
  69. 10.1016/j.jhevol.2006.04.005 · DOI
  70. 10.1093/jn/129.11.2061 · DOI
  71. 10.1007/s11692-009-9055-x · DOI
  72. 10.1016/j.jhevol.2004.03.006 · DOI
  73. 10.1016/S0940-9602(04)80085-2 · DOI
  74. Mitteroecker P, 2013, A brief review of shape, form, and allometry in geometric morphometrics, with applications to human facial morphology, Hystrix, 24, 59
  75. Moss ML., 1973, Fourth international congress of primatologists, 191
  76. 10.1016/0002-9416(71)90135-7 · DOI
  77. 10.1002/ajpa.1330180406 · DOI · Paper page
  78. 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2009.01106.x · DOI
  79. 10.1242/dev.00902 · DOI
  80. 10.1002/ajpa.21523 · DOI · Paper page
  81. 10.1016/j.ics.2006.03.036 · DOI
  82. O'Higgins P, 1999, Human growth in the past: studies from bones and teeth, 128
  83. Oyhenart EE, 2003, Sexual dimorphism and postnatal growth of intrauterine growth retarded rats, Growth Dev Aging GDA, 67, 73
  84. 10.1038/35087573 · DOI
  85. 10.1017/S0022215100048246 · DOI
  86. R Development Core Team, 2010, R: a language and environment for statistical computing
  87. Rampont M., 1994, Les squelettes, os et dents de foetus, nouveaux‐né et enfants du musée anatomique de Strasbourg. Aspect historiques et catalogues
  88. 10.1093/sysbio/42.3.307 · DOI
  89. 10.1002/ajpa.10023 · DOI
  90. Scheuer L, 2000, Developmental juvenile osteology
  91. 10.1002/ajpa.1330560209 · DOI
  92. 10.1002/ajpa.1330620307 · DOI
  93. 10.1016/j.jhevol.2010.05.001 · DOI
  94. Strand Viðarsdóttir U., 1999, Changes in the form of the facial skeleton during growth: a comparative morphometric study of modern humans and Neanderthals
  95. 10.1016/S0940-9602(04)80076-1 · DOI
  96. Strand Viðarsdóttir U, 2003, Patterns of growth and development in the genus Homo, 114, 10.1017/CBO9780511542565.005 · DOI
  97. 10.1002/ajpa.20696 · DOI · Paper page
  98. 10.1210/edrv-15-1-80 · DOI
  99. 10.1002/ajpa.1330320511 · DOI
  100. Ursi WJ, 1993, Sexual dimorphism in normal craniofacial growth, The Angle Orthodontist, 63, 47
  101. von Cramon‐Taubadel N, 2014, Evolutionary insights into global patterns of human cranial diversity: population history, climatic and dietary effects, J Anthropol Sci, 92, 43
  102. 10.1371/journal.pone.0000710 · DOI
  103. White TD, 2012, Human osteology
  104. WileyDF AmentaN AlcantaraDA DeboshmitaG KilYJ DelsonE Harcourt‐SmithW RohlfFJ St JohnK HamannB.2005. Evolutionary morphing. In: Proceedings of IEEE visualizations.
  105. Williams FL, 2002, Human evolution through developmental change, p 405

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Freidline, S. E., Gunz, P., & Hublin, J.
Affiliations
Department of Human Evolution Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology Deutscher Platz 6 Leipzig 04103 Germany
Venue
American Journal of Physical Anthropology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-07-05
Volume
158
Issue
1
Pages
116-131
ISSN
  • 0002-9483
  • 1096-8644
Cited by
46
References
2
Language
en
Funders
  • Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
  • National Science Foundation (0333415, 0513660, 0851756)
  • Leakey Foundation
  • Marie Curie Actions (MRTN-CT-2005-019564)
  • Sigma Xi Foundation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review