The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ontogenetic and static allometry in the human face: Contrasting Khoisan and Inuit
Abstract
Objectives: Regional differences in modern human facial features are present at birth, and ontogenetic allometry contributes to variation in adults. However, details regarding differential rates of growth and timing among regional groups are lacking. We explore ontogenetic and static allometry in a cross‐sectional sample spanning Africa, Europe and North America, and evaluate tempo and mode in two regional groups with very different adult facial morphology, the Khoisan and Inuit. Materials and Methods: Semilandmark geometric morphometric methods, multivariate statistics and growth simulations were used to quantify and compare patterns of facial growth and development. Results: Regional‐specific facial morphology develops early in ontogeny. The Inuit has the most distinct morphology and exhibits heterochronic differences in development compared to other regional groups. Allometric patterns differ during early postnatal development, when significant increases in size are coupled with large amounts of shape changes. All regional groups share a common adult static allometric trajectory, which can be attributed to sexual dimorphism, and the corresponding allometric shape changes resemble developmental patterns during later ontogeny. Discussion: The amount and pattern of growth and development may not be shared between regional groups, indicating that a certain degree of flexibility is allowed for in order to achieve adult size. In early postnatal development the face is less constrained compared to other parts of the cranium allowing for greater evolvability. The early development of region‐specific facial features combined with heterochronic differences in timing or rate of growth, reflected in differences in facial size, suggest different patterns of postnatal growth. Am J Phys Anthropol 158:116–131, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Facial shape changes associated with postnatal ontogenetic allometry are very similar among diverse regional groups, but subtle differences are present.
“Facial shape changes associated with postnatal ontogenetic allometry are very similar among diverse regional groups, but subtle differences are present.”
From Simulation of facial growth based on longitudinal data: Age progression and age regression between 7 and 17 years of age using 3D surface data (2019) · cites this paper as [29]
Developmental shape changes are less consistent in early ontogeny compared to later ontogeny, during which developmental shape changes are very similar among different regional groups.
“Developmental shape changes are less consistent in early ontogeny compared to later ontogeny, during which developmental shape changes are very similar among different regional groups [29].”
From Simulation of facial growth based on longitudinal data: Age progression and age regression between 7 and 17 years of age using 3D surface data (2019) · cites this paper as [29]
Citations
Cites
Viðarsdóttir, U. S., O'Higgins, P., & Stringer, C. (2002) · Journal of Anatomy · doi:10.1046/j.1469-7580.2002.00092.x · Cited by 274
Neubauer, S., Gunz, P., & Hublin, J.-J. (2010) · Journal of Human Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2010.06.011 · Cited by 199
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 105
- 10.1002/ar.10119 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0094837300006588 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jhevol.2009.09.003 · DOI
- Bastir M, 2008, A systems‐model for the morphological analysis of integration and modularity in human craniofacial evolution, J Anthropol Sci, 86, 37
- 10.1002/ajpa.21596 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jhevol.2004.08.009 · DOI
- 10.1002/ajpa.20191 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2006.00644.x · DOI
- 10.1080/03014467900003371 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0002-9416(72)90277-1 · DOI
- 10.1002/ajpa.20317 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/ajpa.1330610312 · DOI
- 10.1002/ajpa.1330560312 · DOI
- 10.1002/ajpa.1330590204 · DOI
- 10.1002/jez.b.21005 · DOI
- 10.1086/404940 · DOI
- 10.1002/ajpa.21485 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199704)102:4<545::AID-AJPA8>3.0.CO;2-Q · DOI
- Dryden IL, 1998, Statistical shape analysis
- Enlow DH., 1990, Facial growth
- Enlow DH, 2008, Essentials of facial growth
- 10.1002/ajpa.1330750409 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jhevol.2012.08.002 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jhevol.2013.07.012 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jhevol.2011.11.005 · DOI
- Froment A, 1992, Correspondence between anatomical differentiation and geographic distribution of modern humans studied by craniometry, CR Acad Des Sci Serie III Sci La Vie‐Life Sci, 315, 323
- 10.1111/ede.12025 · DOI
- 10.1002/jez.b.21430 · DOI
- 10.1002/ajpa.21231 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-4757-3235-1 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1469-185X.1966.tb01624.x · DOI · Paper page
- Gould SJ, 1975, Allometry in primates, with emphasis on scaling and the evolution of the brain, Contrib Primatol, 5, 244
- Gould SJ., 1977, Ontogeny and phylogeny
- 10.1016/j.jhevol.2010.02.007 · DOI
- Gunz P., 2005, Statistical and geometric reconstruction of hominid crania: reconstructing australopithecine ontogeny
- 10.1073/pnas.0808160106 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jhevol.2006.08.010 · DOI
- 10.1007/0-387-27614-9_3 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jhevol.2009.04.004 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jhevol.2011.11.013 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cub.2010.10.018 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/ajhb.20122 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199603)99:3<389::AID-AJPA3>3.0.CO;2-S · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(200001)111:1<105::AID-AJPA7>3.0.CO;2-O · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jhevol.2010.06.005 · DOI
- 10.1002/ajpa.10005 · DOI
- 10.1002/ajpa.22402 · DOI
- Howells WW., 1973, Cranial variation in man: a study by multivariate analysis of patterns of differences among recent human populations
- Howells WW., 1989, Skull shapes and the map, 79
- 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199801)105:1<57::AID-AJPA6>3.0.CO;2-A · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2004.00250.x · DOI
- 10.1210/en.2008-0981 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1469-185X.1997.tb00026.x · DOI
- 10.1086/285430 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9780511542565.013 · DOI
- 10.1006/jhev.1996.0056 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199610)101:2<217::AID-AJPA7>3.0.CO;2-Z · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2008.00900.x · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.022440799 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1006/jhev.1998.0287 · DOI
- 10.1002/1096-8644(2000)43:31 <117::AID-AJPA5>3.3.CO;2-9 · DOI
- 10.1002/ajpa.1330810108 · DOI
- Lynch JM, 1996, Geometric morphometrics in primatology: craniofacial variation in homo sapiens and pan troglodytes, Folia Primatol (Basel), 67, 15, 10.1159/000157203 · DOI
- Maddux SD., 2011, A quantitative assessment of infraorbital morphology in Homo: testing for character independence and evolutionary significance in the human midface, 10.17077/etd.zc7140w7 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jhevol.2008.10.003 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1210/en.2004-0665 · DOI
- 10.1111/joa.12075 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jhevol.2007.05.013 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jhevol.2006.04.005 · DOI
- 10.1093/jn/129.11.2061 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11692-009-9055-x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jhevol.2004.03.006 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0940-9602(04)80085-2 · DOI
- Mitteroecker P, 2013, A brief review of shape, form, and allometry in geometric morphometrics, with applications to human facial morphology, Hystrix, 24, 59
- Moss ML., 1973, Fourth international congress of primatologists, 191
- 10.1016/0002-9416(71)90135-7 · DOI
- 10.1002/ajpa.1330180406 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2009.01106.x · DOI
- 10.1242/dev.00902 · DOI
- 10.1002/ajpa.21523 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.ics.2006.03.036 · DOI
- O'Higgins P, 1999, Human growth in the past: studies from bones and teeth, 128
- Oyhenart EE, 2003, Sexual dimorphism and postnatal growth of intrauterine growth retarded rats, Growth Dev Aging GDA, 67, 73
- 10.1038/35087573 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0022215100048246 · DOI
- R Development Core Team, 2010, R: a language and environment for statistical computing
- Rampont M., 1994, Les squelettes, os et dents de foetus, nouveaux‐né et enfants du musée anatomique de Strasbourg. Aspect historiques et catalogues
- 10.1093/sysbio/42.3.307 · DOI
- 10.1002/ajpa.10023 · DOI
- Scheuer L, 2000, Developmental juvenile osteology
- 10.1002/ajpa.1330560209 · DOI
- 10.1002/ajpa.1330620307 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jhevol.2010.05.001 · DOI
- Strand Viðarsdóttir U., 1999, Changes in the form of the facial skeleton during growth: a comparative morphometric study of modern humans and Neanderthals
- 10.1016/S0940-9602(04)80076-1 · DOI
- Strand Viðarsdóttir U, 2003, Patterns of growth and development in the genus Homo, 114, 10.1017/CBO9780511542565.005 · DOI
- 10.1002/ajpa.20696 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1210/edrv-15-1-80 · DOI
- 10.1002/ajpa.1330320511 · DOI
- Ursi WJ, 1993, Sexual dimorphism in normal craniofacial growth, The Angle Orthodontist, 63, 47
- von Cramon‐Taubadel N, 2014, Evolutionary insights into global patterns of human cranial diversity: population history, climatic and dietary effects, J Anthropol Sci, 92, 43
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0000710 · DOI
- White TD, 2012, Human osteology
- WileyDF AmentaN AlcantaraDA DeboshmitaG KilYJ DelsonE Harcourt‐SmithW RohlfFJ St JohnK HamannB.2005. Evolutionary morphing. In: Proceedings of IEEE visualizations.
- Williams FL, 2002, Human evolution through developmental change, p 405
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Koudelová, J., Hoffmannová, E., Dupej, J., & Velemínská, J. (2019) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0212618 · Cited by 33
Morphological trends in arcade shape and size in Middle Pleistocene Homo
Stelzer, S., Neubauer, S., Hublin, J., Spoor, F., & Gunz, P. (2019) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.23721 · Cited by 18
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Freidline, S. E., Gunz, P., & Hublin, J.
- Affiliations
- Department of Human Evolution Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology Deutscher Platz 6 Leipzig 04103 Germany
- Venue
- American Journal of Physical Anthropology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-07-05
- Volume
- 158
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 116-131
- ISSN
- 0002-9483
- 1096-8644
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
- National Science Foundation (0333415, 0513660, 0851756)
- Leakey Foundation
- Marie Curie Actions (MRTN-CT-2005-019564)
- Sigma Xi Foundation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review