Cited by 35Race, Genetics, and SocietyPhilosophy and History of ScienceCultural Identity and Representation

Janus‐faced race: Is race biological, social, or mythical?

Hochman, Adam·2021·American Journal of Physical Anthropology

Abstract

As belief in the reality of race as a biological category among U.S. anthropologists has fallen, belief in the reality of race as a social category has risen in its place. The view that race simply does not exist—that it is a myth—is treated with suspicion. While racial classification is linked to many of the worst evils of recent history, it is now widely believed to be necessary to fight back against racism. In this article, I argue that race is indeed a biological fiction, but I critique the claim that race is socially real. I defend a form of anti-realist reconstructionism about race, which says that there are no races, only racialized groups—groups mistakenly believed to be races. I argue that this is the most attractive position about race from a metaphysical perspective, and that it is also the position most conductive to public understanding and social justice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ajpa.24169

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Dobzhansky T., 1962, Comment, Current Anthropology, 3, 279
  2. Kitcher P., 1999, Racism, 87
  3. 10.3378/027.081.0621 · DOI
  4. Msimang P., 2019, Racializing races: The racialized groups of interactive constructionism do not exclude races, Ergo, 6, 1
  5. Reich D., 2018, How genetics is changing our understanding of ‘race, The New York Times

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hochman, A.
Affiliations
Macquarie University (AU)
Corresponding author
Hochman, Adam
Venue
American Journal of Physical Anthropology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-11-02
Volume
175
Issue
2
Pages
453-464
ISSN
  • 0002-9483 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-8644
OpenAlex
W3097356937
Cited by
35
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7
FWCI
11.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Physical Anthropology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Race, Genetics, and Society
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Cultural Identity and Representation
Keywords
race, biological race, social construction of race, racial classification, racialized groups, metaphysics of race, racism, social justice
MeSH terms
Anthropology, Physical, Humans, United States, Racial Groups, Racism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review