Cited by 76Race, Genetics, and SocietyPhilosophy and History of ScienceForensic and Genetic Research

Clines Without Classes: How to Make Sense of Human Variation

Fujimura, Joan H., Bolnick, Deborah A., Rajagopalan, Ramya, Kaufman, Jay S., Lewontin, Richard C., Duster, Troy, Ossorio, Pilar, Marks, Jonathan·2014·Sociological Theory

Abstract

This article examines Shiao, Bode, Beyer, and Selvig’s (2012) arguments in their article “The Genomic Challenge to the Social Construction of Race” and finds that their claims are based on fundamentally flawed interpretations of current genetic research. We discuss current genomic and genetic knowledge about human biological variation to demonstrate why and how Shiao et al.’s recommendations for future sociological studies and social policy, based on their inadequate understanding of genomic methods and evidence, are similarly flawed and will lead sociology astray.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0735275114551611

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Genetics, biomedical researchers, and sociologists of science have emphasized the importance of distinguishing ancestry from racial taxonomies within biomedical research and have warned against the dangers of using racial categories to describe genetic variation.

    “Genetics, biomedical researchers, and sociologists of science have emphasized the importance of distinguishing ancestry from racial taxonomies within biomedical research [40, 49, 84] and have warned against the dangers of of using racial categories to describe genetic variation [14, 30, 122].”

    From Towards a critical race methodology in algorithmic fairness (2020) · cites this paper as [40]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 89 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fujimura, J. H., Bolnick, D. A., Rajagopalan, R., Kaufman, J. S., Lewontin, R. C., Duster, T., Ossorio, P., & Marks, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • McGill University (CA)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Charlotte (US)
Venue
Sociological Theory
Published
2014-09
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
208-227
ISSN
  • 0735-2751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9558
OpenAlex
W1974686998
Cited by
76
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 1
FWCI
5.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Sociological Theory (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Race, Genetics, and Society
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
Keywords
race, social construction of race, human diversity, genetic variation, race and genetics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review