Cited by 206Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and Influences

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Imaging hippocampal function across the human life span: Is memory decline normal or not?

Open access

Abstract

Memory function commonly declines in later life. Whether memory decline represents a disease process or whether it is part of normal aging remains unknown. Here we answer this question by assessing the function of multiple subregions that make up the hippocampal circuit across the human life span. A newly developed MRI approach—designed to detect functional changes in individual hippocampal subregions—was used to assess the hippocampal circuit in 70 subjects between 20 and 88 years of age. Using strict parametric criteria, analysis revealed that function in two hippocampal subregions—the subiculum and the dentate gyrus—decline normally with age. In contrast, function in the entorhinal cortex declines pathologically. Single‐subject analysis revealed that hippocampal dysfunction, found in 60% of elders was selectively correlated with memory decline. These results show that memory decline is caused by different mechanisms and suggests how memory decline should be approached clinically.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.10105

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 27 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Amaral DG, The human nervous system
  2. Wechsler D, 1981, WAIS‐R manual
  3. Benton AL, 1967, FAS test. Neurosensory Center comprehensive examination for aphasia

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–206 of 206

Metadata

Authors
Small, S. A., Tsai, W. Y., DeLaPaz, R., Mayeux, R., & Stern, Y.
Affiliations
Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Small, Scott A.
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-02-28
Volume
51
Issue
3
Pages
290-295
ISSN
  • 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8249
OpenAlex
W2107406220
Cited by
205
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 13
FWCI
7.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (AG08702, AG 00949, P50AG008702)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
hippocampal function, memory decline, normal aging, hippocampal subfields, subiculum, dentate gyrus, entorhinal cortex, hippocampal circuitry
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Female, Hippocampus, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory, Memory Disorders, Middle Aged, Reference Values, Entorhinal Cortex, Dentate Gyrus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review