Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 250

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Thalamic atrophy in multiple sclerosis: A magnetic resonance imaging marker of neurodegeneration throughout disease

Open access
Azevedo, Christina J., Cen, Steven Y., Khadka, Sankalpa, Liu, Shuang, Kornak, John, Shi, Yonggang, Zheng, Ling, Hauser, Stephen L., Pelletier, Daniel·2018·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

Objective: Thalamic volume is a candidate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)‐based marker associated with neurodegeneration to hasten development of neuroprotective treatments. Our objective is to describe the longitudinal evolution of thalamic atrophy in MS and normal aging, and to estimate sample sizes for study design. Methods: Six hundred one subjects (2,632 MRI scans) were analyzed. Five hundred twenty subjects with relapse‐onset MS (clinically isolated syndrome, n = 90; relapsing–remitting MS, n = 392; secondary progressive MS, n = 38) underwent annual standardized 3T MRI scans for an average of 4.1 years, including a 1mm 3 3‐dimensional T1‐weighted sequence (3DT1; 2,485 MRI scans). Eighty‐one healthy controls (HC) were scanned longitudinally on the same scanner using the same protocol (147 MRI scans). 3DT1s were processed using FreeSurfer's longitudinal pipeline after lesion inpainting. Rates of normalized thalamic volume loss in MS and HC were compared in linear mixed effects models. Simulation‐based sample size calculations were performed incorporating the rate of atrophy in HC. Results: Thalamic volume declined significantly faster in MS subjects compared to HC, with an estimated decline of −0.71% per year (95% confidence interval [CI] = −0.77% to −0.64%) in MS subjects and −0.28% per year (95% CI = −0.58% to 0.02%) in HC (p for difference = 0.007). The rate of decline was consistent throughout the MS disease duration and across MS clinical subtypes. Eighty or 100 subjects per arm (α = 0.1 or 0.05, respectively) would be needed to detect the maximal effect size with 80% power in a 24‐month study. Interpretation: Thalamic atrophy occurs early and consistently throughout MS. Preliminary sample size calculations appear feasible, adding to its appeal as an MRI marker associated with neurodegeneration. Ann Neurol 2018;83:223–234

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.25150

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 250

Metadata

Authors
Azevedo, C. J., Cen, S. Y., Khadka, S., Liu, S., Kornak, J., Shi, Y., Zheng, L., Hauser, S. L., & Pelletier, D.
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-02
Volume
83
Issue
2
Pages
223-234
ISSN
  • 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8249
OpenAlex
W2783943799
Cited by
250
References
5
FWCI
15.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Thalamic atrophy in multiple sclerosis: A magnetic resonance imaging marker of neurodegeneration throughout disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.25150
The paper
Azevedo, C. J., Cen, S. Y., Khadka, S., Liu, S., Kornak, J., Shi, Y., Zheng, L., Hauser, S. L., & Pelletier, D. (2018). Thalamic atrophy in multiple sclerosis: A magnetic resonance imaging marker of neurodegeneration throughout disease. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.25150

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.