CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,905Polymer crystallization and propertiesWaste Management and RecyclingRecycling and Waste Management Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 162 of the 174 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Beyond Mechanical Recycling: Giving New Life to Plastic Waste

Open access
Vollmer, Ina, Jenks, Michael J. F., Roelands, Mark C. P., White, Robin J., van Harmelen, Toon, de Wild, Paul, van der Laan, Gerard P., Meirer, Florian, Keurentjes, Jos T. F., Weckhuysen, Bert M.·2020·Angewandte Chemie International Edition
DOI 10.1002/anie.201915651PMC PMC7497176
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Increasing the stream of recycled plastic necessitates an approach beyond the traditional recycling via melting and re‐extrusion. Various chemical recycling processes have great potential to enhance recycling rates. In this Review, a summary of the various chemical recycling routes and assessment via life‐cycle analysis is complemented by an extensive list of processes developed by companies active in chemical recycling. We show that each of the currently available processes is applicable for specific plastic waste streams. Thus, only a combination of different technologies can address the plastic waste problem. Research should focus on more realistic, more contaminated and mixed waste streams, while collection and sorting infrastructure will need to be improved, that is, by stricter regulation. This Review aims to inspire both science and innovation for the production of higher value and quality products from plastic recycling suitable for reuse or valorization to create the necessary economic and environmental push for a circular economy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/anie.201915651

Cites

162 of 162 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Illustration of an envisioned plastics value‐chain that could enhance the transition to circularity. Currently most plastic is incinerated or landfilled (bottom left), because collection and sorting produce very contaminated and mixed plastic‐waste streams. Better techniques for collection and sorting lead to streams of plastic waste that can be recycled by the various chemical recycling methods. These routes are still going to be complemented by traditional mechanical recycling for the purest steams of a single polymer. The shares that each of the techniques corresponded to in 2016 bottom left of the waste processing method and prediction for 2030 are shown at the bottom right of the waste processing method. These values are based on the McKinsey report.2 The plastic objects are sold to the consumer and after its life cycle collected again for sorting to undergo another recycle.
Figure 1 Illustration of an envisioned plastics value‐chain that could enhance the transition to circularity. Currently most plastic is incinerated or landfilled (bottom left), because collection and sorting produce very contaminated and mixed plastic‐waste streams. Better techniques for collection and sorting lead to streams of plastic waste that can be recycled by the various chemical recycling methods. These routes are still going to be complemented by traditional mechanical recycling for the purest steams of a single polymer. The shares that each of the techniques corresponded to in 2016 bottom left of the waste processing method and prediction for 2030 are shown at the bottom right of the waste processing method. These values are based on the McKinsey report.2 The plastic objects are sold to the consumer and after its life cycle collected again for sorting to undergo another recycle.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Top: CO2‐equivalent emissions of different EoL treatment technologies applied for several plastic‐waste streams, in relative emissions indexed to incineration (100 wt %). Bottom: CO2‐equivalent emissions of different EoL treatment technologies in absolute emissions in ton CO2/ton waste by life ‐cycle stage.
Figure 2 Top: CO2‐equivalent emissions of different EoL treatment technologies applied for several plastic‐waste streams, in relative emissions indexed to incineration (100 wt %). Bottom: CO2‐equivalent emissions of different EoL treatment technologies in absolute emissions in ton CO2/ton waste by life ‐cycle stage.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Microwave heating (b), plasma reactors (c) and supercritical fluids (d) can address some of the problems encountered in conventional solvolysis and pyrolysis (a).
Figure 3 Microwave heating (b), plasma reactors (c) and supercritical fluids (d) can address some of the problems encountered in conventional solvolysis and pyrolysis (a).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Products obtained through the different solvolysis pathways of PET, PU, and PA and how these products can be used to recycle back to the polymer or to obtain valuable products.
Figure 4 Products obtained through the different solvolysis pathways of PET, PU, and PA and how these products can be used to recycle back to the polymer or to obtain valuable products.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 5 The plastic is dissolved and undissolved fragments, such as pigments, are removed by filtration. The top route describes the dissolution/precipitation technique using a single solvent, which is removed by evaporation, crystallizing the polymer for recovery. For the bottom route an anti‐solvent is used to precipitate the polymer, which can be recovered by filtration. Both routes require a solvent removal step, which can be time and energy consuming unless a supercritical anti‐solvent is employed.
Figure 5 The plastic is dissolved and undissolved fragments, such as pigments, are removed by filtration. The top route describes the dissolution/precipitation technique using a single solvent, which is removed by evaporation, crystallizing the polymer for recovery. For the bottom route an anti‐solvent is used to precipitate the polymer, which can be recovered by filtration. Both routes require a solvent removal step, which can be time and energy consuming unless a supercritical anti‐solvent is employed.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 6 With an increase in the number of functional groups and heteroatoms in the backbone of the polymer (top), the distribution of products and the pyrolytic mechanisms become less complicated. Process parameters provide a higher degree of control over the product distribution for polyolefins, in this example HDPE, although the ultimate monomer yield is lower than for PS and PMMA. A common theme of all pyrolysis is that an excessively high temperature leads to coke formation given that the residence time is long enough. Although, most reaction steps occur at lower temperatures, similar trends are observed for catalytic processes. BTX denotes benzene, toluene, and xylene.
Figure 6 With an increase in the number of functional groups and heteroatoms in the backbone of the polymer (top), the distribution of products and the pyrolytic mechanisms become less complicated. Process parameters provide a higher degree of control over the product distribution for polyolefins, in this example HDPE, although the ultimate monomer yield is lower than for PS and PMMA. A common theme of all pyrolysis is that an excessively high temperature leads to coke formation given that the residence time is long enough. Although, most reaction steps occur at lower temperatures, similar trends are observed for catalytic processes. BTX denotes benzene, toluene, and xylene.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 174 references

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. “BP′s new technology to enable circularity for unrecyclable PET plastic waste ” can be found underhttps://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/news-and-insights/press-releases/bp-new-technology-to-enable-circularity-for-unrecyclable-pet-plastic-waste.html 2019.
  2. M. Schlummer F. Wolff A. Maurer in2016 Electron. Goes Green 2016+ EGG 2016 IEEE 2017 pp. 1–6. · DOI
  3. Maase M., 2005, Ion. Liq. IIIB Fundam. Progress, Challenges, Oppor., 126
  4. Maase M., 2008, Ion. Liq. Synth.
  5. Kolbert A. C., 1997, Am. Chem. Soc. Polym. Prepr. Div. Polym. Chem., 38, 819
  6. 10.1007/s10924-008-0106-7 · DOI
  7. Behrendt G., 2009, J. Univ. Chem. Technol. Metall., 44, 3
  8. Bartolome L., 2012, Mater. Recycl. Trends Perspect./ Monogr., 406
  9. Mohsin M. A., 2017, Int. J. Chem. Eng.
  10. Gutiérrez C., 2012, J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manage., 14, 308
  11. Prawisudha P., 2011, J. Environ. Sci. Eng., 5, 432
  12. Kaminsky W., 2016, Macromol. Symp., 10
  13. Prasad N., 2018, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., 25, 363
  14. Akah A., 2015, Chem. Eng. Trans., 43, 2395

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 501–600 of 1,001

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Vollmer, I., Jenks, M. J. F., Roelands, M. C. P., White, R. J., van Harmelen, T., de Wild, P., van der Laan, G. P., Meirer, F., Keurentjes, J. T. F., & Weckhuysen, B. M.
Affiliations
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (NL)
  • The Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (TNO) Climate, Air & Sustainability Department Utrecht The Netherlands
  • Energieonderzoek Centrum Nederland (ECN)- part of TNO, Biomass & Energy Efficiency Petten The Netherlands
  • University of Twente (NL)
Corresponding author
Weckhuysen, Bert M.
ORCID
Venue
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-06-25
Volume
59
Issue
36
Pages
15402-15423
ISSN
  • 1433-7851 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-3773
DOI
10.1002/anie.201915651
PMC
PMC7497176
OpenAlex
W3012481340
Cited by
1,905
References
174
Citations by year
2026: 346 · 2025: 394 · 2024: 398 · 2023: 327 · 2022: 267 · 2021: 149 · 2020: 24
FWCI
11.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Angewandte Chemie International Edition (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • TNO Repository (submittedVersion)
  • TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Repository hosted by TU Delft Library (TU Delft) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (MCEC, Zwaartekracht Programma, ARC CBBC Consortium)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer crystallization and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Waste Management and Recycling
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
Keywords
chemical recycling, plastic waste, plastic recycling, life cycle assessment, mechanical recycling, mixed waste streams, circular economy, plastic valorization, recycling technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review