The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mapping research specialties
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory
Latour, B. (2005) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199256044.001.0001 · Cited by 16,778
The Matthew Effect in Science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered.
Merton, R. K. (1968) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.159.3810.56 · Cited by 6,720
Gieryn, T. F. (1983) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095325 · Cited by 4,838
The entity-relationship model—toward a unified view of data
Chen, P. P.-S. (1976) · ACM Transactions on Database Systems · doi:10.1145/320434.320440 · Cited by 4,708
Searching for intellectual turning points: progressive knowledge domain visualization
Chen, C. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0307513100 · Cited by 2,791
Stages of Small-Group Development Revisited
Tuckman, B. W., & Jensen, M. A. C. (1977) · Group & Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/105960117700200404 · Cited by 2,679
The Matthew Effect in Science, II: Cumulative Advantage and the Symbolism of Intellectual Property
Merton, R. K. (1988) · Isis · doi:10.1086/354848 · Cited by 1,397
The Intellectual and Social Organization Of the Sciences
Whitley, R. (2000) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199240531.001.0001 · Cited by 1,076
Nigel Gilbert, G. (1977) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/030631277700700112 · Cited by 691
Content Analysis of References: Adjunct or Alternative to Citation Counting?
Chubin, D. E., & Moitra, S. D. (1975) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/030631277500500403 · Cited by 357
Private acts and public objects: An investigation of citer motivations
Brooks, T. A. (1985) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science · doi:10.1002/asi.4630360402 · Cited by 256
An Introduction to Science Studies: The Philosophical and Social Aspects of Science and Technology
Ziman, J. M. (1984) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511608360 · Cited by 245
Hargens, L. L. (2000) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2657516 · Cited by 211
Achievement and Ascriptive Processes in the Recognition of Scientific Articles
Stewart, J. A. (1983) · Social Forces · doi:10.1093/sf/62.1.166 · Cited by 110
Luukkonen, T. (1997) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/bf02461121 · Cited by 94
Socio-Bibliometric Mapping of Intra-Departmental Networks
Mählck, P., & Persson, O. (2000) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1023/a:1005661208810 · Cited by 73
POWER LAW RELATIONS IN SCIENCE BIBLIOGRAPHY—A SELF‐CONSISTENT INTERPRETATION
NARANAN, S. (1971) · Journal of Documentation · doi:10.1108/eb026510 · Cited by 72
MARTYN, J. (1975) · Journal of Documentation · doi:10.1108/eb026610 · Cited by 43
Cited by
Analyzing the evolution of technostress: A science mapping approach
Salazar-Concha, C., Ficapal-Cusí, P., Boada-Grau, J., & Camacho, L. J. (2021) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06726 · Cited by 106
Metadata
- Authors
- Morris, S. A., & Van der Veer Martens, B.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Information Science and Technology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-01
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 213-295
- ISSN
- 0066-4200 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-8382
- OpenAlex
- W4211211006
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 8.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
