The DOI matches its Crossref record; 99 of the 99 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ChatGPT and a new academic reality: Artificial Intelligence‐written research papers and the ethics of the large language models in scholarly publishing
Open accessAbstract
Abstract This article discusses OpenAI's ChatGPT, a generative pre‐trained transformer, which uses natural language processing to fulfill text‐based user requests (i.e., a “chatbot”). The history and principles behind ChatGPT and similar models are discussed. This technology is then discussed in relation to its potential impact on academia and scholarly research and publishing. ChatGPT is seen as a potential model for the automated preparation of essays and other types of scholarly manuscripts. Potential ethical issues that could arise with the emergence of large language models like GPT‐3, the underlying technology behind ChatGPT, and its usage by academics and researchers, are discussed and situated within the context of broader advancements in artificial intelligence, machine learning, and natural language processing for research and scholarly publishing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Many authors have expressed concern that students are submitting papers generated by ChatGPT and other AI tools as their own original work, thereby attaining the performance goal but bypassing the learning goal.”
From The Effectiveness of Software Designed to Detect AI-Generated Writing: A Comparison of 16 AI Text Detectors (2023) · cites this paper as Lund et al., 2023
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This is due to concern centered on plagiarism because it is challenging to trace and verify the originality of AI-generated content [59, 60].”
From Generative artificial intelligence (GAI) usage guidelines for scholarly publishing: a cross-sectional study of medical journals (2025) · cites this paper as [59]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“They are discussed not only as tools for writing, summarizing, or retrieving scientific texts, but also as systems that may help evaluate research quality, generate manuscript feedback, and support peer review workflows (Kousha & Thelwall, 2025;Lund et al., 2023;Thelwall, 2025a).”
From Beyond Human-Likeness: Mapping the Scientific Critique Profiles of LLMs and Human Reviewers (2026) · cites this paper as Lund et al., 2023
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“This uncritical dependence not only hinders the development of critical thinking skills [6], [7].”
From A Meta-Synthesis of Factual Accuracy and Citation Hallucination in LLM Academic Assistants (2026) · cites this paper as [7]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Misattribution can lead to wrongful accusations or misinterpretation of an author's intent [Lund et al., 2023].”
From Authorship Attribution in the Era of LLMs: Problems, Methodologies, and Challenges (2025) · cites this paper as Lund et al., 2023
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
In the citing paper
“Finding answers to this question is urgent as LLMs are already starting to permeate the academic landscape (10–17).”
From How should the advancement of large language models affect the practice of science? (2025) · cites this paper as [14]
In the citing paper
“This forecast supports claims made by other scholars, who argue that LLMs will help automate mundane tasks and free up space for creative thinking (Lund et al. 2023;Dwivedi et al. 2023).”
From Friend or foe? Exploring the implications of large language models on the science system (2025) · cites this paper as Lund et al. 2023
In the citing paper
“This outcome resonates with the scholarly discourse which highlights how generative AI can be used to enhance texts, such as with brainstorming (Staiman 2023), crafting literature reviews (Lucey and Dowling 2023), and improving text clarity (Lund et al. 2023).”
From Friend or foe? Exploring the implications of large language models on the science system (2025) · cites this paper as Lund et al. 2023
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.04805 · Cited by 73,173
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.14165 · Cited by 23,372
RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach
Liu, Y., Ott, M., Goyal, N., Du, J., Joshi, M., Chen, D., Levy, O., Lewis, M., Zettlemoyer, L., & Stoyanov, V. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.11692 · Cited by 16,515
Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects
Jordan, M. I., & Mitchell, T. M. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa8415 · Cited by 9,955
On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big? 🦜
Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3442188.3445922 · Cited by 6,988 · cited 1×
“Although ChatGPT's massive Internet data set offers a wide range of perspectives and voices, Emily Bender, a computational linguist, has noted that size does not guarantee diversity (Bender et al., 2021).”
BackgroundThe Matthew Effect in Science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered.
Merton, R. K. (1968) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.159.3810.56 · Cited by 6,720
XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understanding
Yang, Z., Dai, Z., Yang, Y., Carbonell, J., Salakhutdinov, R., & Le, Q. V. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1906.08237 · Cited by 6,687
The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines
Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2 · Cited by 6,220
(1968) · PubMed · Cited by 4,803
Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLP
Strubell, E., Ganesh, A., & McCallum, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1355 · Cited by 3,684
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Alutto J. A., 2008, Final report of the AACSB international impact of research task force
- Beath C., 2012, Finding value in the information explosion, MIT Sloan Management Review, 53, 18
- Caplow T., 1958, The academic marketplace
- 10.1080/08989621.2023.216853 · DOI
- Lokman A. S., 2018, Proceedings of the future technologies conference, 1012
- Müller V. C., 2021, The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (summer 2021)
- Olsson A. &Engelbrektsson O.(2022).A thesis that writes itself: On the threat of AI‐generated essays within academia(Bachelor thesis).https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1669744/FULLTEXT02
- Yanisky‐Ravid S., 2017, Generating Rembrandt: Artificial intelligence, copyright, and accountability in the 3A Era: The human‐like authors are already here, Michigan State Law Review, 659
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 801–900 of 923
AI-augmented HRM research: leveraging AI as co-intelligence throughout the research lifecycle
Bradley‐Geist, J. C., & Walker, D. O. H. (2026) · Personnel Review · doi:10.1108/pr-01-2025-0047
Human-Centered Insights Into ChatGPT in General Education
Ravi, S. S., Bhagat, S., Paramasivam, S., & Yohannan, S. S. (2026) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-6831-3.ch008
Khurana, A., Kumar, V. V. R., & Gupta, C. P. (2025) · International Conference on Information Systems and Computer Networks (ISCON) · doi:10.1109/iscon65210.2025.11341416
Who Wrote This Code? Investigating Human and AI Programming Patterns
Nitika, & Narwal, R. (2025) · International Conference on Image Information Processing (ICIIP) · doi:10.1109/iciip68302.2025.11346257
Human-AI collaboration in vocational writing: Building a framework for adaptive English learning
Çiçek, Ş. T., & Can, D. T. (2026) · Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning · doi:10.31681/jetol.1821890
GENERATIVE AI IN LIBRARIES: OPPORTUNITIES, CHALLENGES, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS
Vanik, H., & Gamit, R. M. (2025) · Towards Excellence · doi:10.37867/te170312
The Perspective of Social Science Academics on Digitalization
Zıddıoğlu, Y., & Yüksel, H. (2025) · DergiPark (Istanbul University)
Current developments of Psychological Research and the use of AI
Strobach, T., & Pazhoohi, F. (2026) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-026-02246-0
Alexe, C.-G., Alexe, C.-M., & NEDELCU, A.-S. (2025) · International Conference of Management and Industrial Engineering · doi:10.56177/12icmie2025.192
Trust in Chatbot-Generated Health Information: A User Perspective
Jowkar, T., & Baji, F. (2026) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-17272-3_40
Stojanov, A., Koh, J. H. L., & Liu, Q. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-1875-3_17
Χρυσανθοπούλου, Κ. (2026) · Ετήσιο Ελληνόφωνο Επιστημονικό Συνέδριο Εργαστηρίων Επικοινωνίας · doi:10.12681/cclabs.9684
Khan, K. I., Correia, A. B., Nasir, A., Dantas, R. M., & Mata, P. N. (2026) · Journal of the Knowledge Economy · doi:10.1007/s13132-026-03182-5 · Cited by 1
Workshop on Generative AI and Academic Search (GAI&AS)
Liu, Y., Arguello, J., Hoeber, O., Liu, C., Rieh, S. Y., & Sinnamon, L. S. (2026) · Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval · doi:10.1145/3786304.3787953 · Cited by 1
Soyugür, B. (2026) · Spor Bilimleri Dergisi Hacettepe Üniversitesi · doi:10.17644/sbd.1740656
(2025) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-83608-358-020251009
Ensuring ethical standards in scholarly publishing
Mohebbi, A. (2025) · Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes · doi:10.1075/jerpp.00033.moh · Cited by 3
Wang, Y., & Xu, C. (2026) · International Journal of Public Health · doi:10.3389/ijph.2026.1609017
Peekhaus, W. (2026) · The Library Quarterly · doi:10.1086/739803 · Cited by 1
MAKALELERDE YAPAY ZEKÂ VARLIĞININ DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ: YAYINLANMIŞ ÇALIŞMALARDAN ELDE EDİLEN BULGULAR
Akkaya, A., & Beygirci, B. (2026) · Uluslararası Batı Karadeniz sosyal ve beşeri bilimler dergisi · doi:10.46452/baksoder.1899625
Ethical Usage of Artificial Intelligence Tools in Information Science Research
Oladokun, B. D., & Tella, A. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-2600-0434-0.ch006
Turizm Eğitiminde Yapay Zekâ Uygulamaları
UĞUR, N. G. (2025) · Selçuk Turizm ve Bilişim Araştırmaları Dergisi · doi:10.71276/stbad.1756048
Artificial Intelligence in Electronic Journalism: Innovation Horizons and Ethical Challenges
Mazahreh, M. H. (2026) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-15784-3_38
Chen, Q., Xue, Y., Lin, J., & Zhu, C. (2026) · Big Data and Cognitive Computing · doi:10.3390/bdcc10040108 · Cited by 1
González‐Chordá, V. M., Rodríguez-Calero, M. A., Lima-Serrano, M., la Torre, H. G., Fernández-Ortega, P., & Camacho‐Bejarano, R. (2026) · Enfermería Clínica · doi:10.1016/j.enfcli.2026.502513
Ethical Use of ChatGPT and Critic-AI in Academic Writing and ResearchPreprint
Yaprak, Z. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6539730
Singh, D., Ghosh, A., Pandey, B., & Pandey, J. K. (2026) · PharmaNutrition · doi:10.1016/j.phanu.2026.100494
Daneshfar, S., & Zhang, G. (2026) · Culture and Education · doi:10.1177/11356405261435355 · Cited by 2
On the Vulnerability of Citation Metrics in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence
Smarsly, K. (2026) · Publications · doi:10.3390/publications14020023
Medveckis, A., Pīgozne, T., Birziņa, R., & Pelnēna, I. (2026) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2026.1756665
Generative AI in Academic Publishing
Kumar, A., McKeown, D., Syed, H., Craig, C. J., Rupley, W. H., Ahmed, A., Kashwani, S., & Siddiqui, K. A. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/407619
A scientometric review of research on student plagiarism (1970–2022)
Huang, D., & Hu, G. (2026) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2026.2656283
Fifani, S., Rabhi, D., & Qachar, A. (2026) · EDPACS · doi:10.1080/07366981.2026.2663388
Governance and legitimacy in AI: developing and testing the AI Authorship Legitimacy Model (AALM)
Adeyemi, S. (2026) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-026-01162-8
Xu, J., Bian, X., Cheng, J., & Sun, H. (2026) · International Conference on Informatics Education and Computer Technology Applications (IECA) · doi:10.1145/3802133.3802277
In the Age of Automation: Impact on Human Values, Ethics, and the Risk of Dehumanization
Mentari, S., Pramana, A. C., & Winarno, A. (2025) · JIMEK Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Ekonomi · doi:10.30737/jimek.v8i1.6297
Kamoun, F., Iqbal, F., Abidi, H., & Brik, A. B. (2026) · Lecture notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-16635-7_24
Bibliometric mapping of mathematical pedagogies
VALLE, L. (2026) · Multidisciplinary Reviews · doi:10.31893/multirev.2026538
RUTTENBERG, D. (2026) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-026-03082-x · Cited by 2
FACTORS INFLUENCING CHATGPT USAGE AMONG UNIVERSITY STUDENTS: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY IN GEORGIA
Kikoria, G. (2026) · Social Economics · doi:10.26565/2524-2547-2026-73-03
Reproducibility, Transparency, and Open Science in AI-Driven Statistical Education
Cruz, V. P. J. D., & Musni-tagaytay, F. M. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-6259-5.ch011
GenAI Humanizers in Academic Writing: A Novel Ethical Risk Detection Model Using Machine Learning
Ghosal, I., Rajak, R., Saxena, R., Vijai, A., Kaloria, S., & Sheikh, M. F. A. (2026) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-25955-4_36
Roxas, R. C. D. (2026) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research and Innovation · doi:10.29328/journal.jairi.1001018
Hariprasad, T., Shreepathy, L., Suvarna, V., Kumar, C. R., & Llantuy, N. L. (2026) · International Conference on Computing for Sustainable Global Development · doi:10.23919/indiacom70271.2026.11525478
A phenomenographic analysis of undergraduates’ conceptions of generative AI-mediated learning
Mau, B.-R., Tsai, C., Wu, Y.-P., Feng, H.-H., & Lin, T. (2026) · Journal of Research on Technology in Education · doi:10.1080/15391523.2026.2675632
An emerging AI4Academia model: exploring the ethical implications of GenAI in higher education
Hendal, B. A. (2026) · Information Discovery and Delivery · doi:10.1108/idd-01-2026-0024
Tessa, M., Cidjeu, D. D., Carli, R., Abchiche, S., Aldarwish, A., Tchappi, I., & Najjar, A. (2026) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2026.04.093
Liu, Q., & Ren, H. (2026) · International Conference on Big Data and Informatization Education (ICBDIE) · doi:10.1145/3806980.3807111
Students’ Perceptions of Generative AI Use and Academic Integrity in Translation Learning
Syamsuddin, M. R., & As'ary, M. A. (2026) · DEIKTIS Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra · doi:10.53769/deiktis.v6i2.3657
The Plagiarist in the Machine? Generative AI and the Will to Fail
Barnard, M. J., & Crome, K. (2026) · Future Humanities · doi:10.1002/fhu2.70030
Pan, Y.-L., Yu, P.-F., Yin, X.-L., Hong-sheng, Y., Long, X., & Tong, Q. (2026) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-026-10659-2 · Cited by 1
Shahzad, K., Khan, S. A., Ahmmad, M., Iqbal, A., & Ahmad, S. (2026) · Performance Measurement and Metrics · doi:10.1108/pmm-09-2025-0056
Barria‐Asenjo, N. A., García, M. D., Schröter, J., Betancor, O., Willems, B. D., Acosta, J. G., Maiwald, F., & Ramos-Vera, J. (2026) · En-claves del pensamiento · doi:10.46530/ecdp.v0i40.827
Society-oriented AI governance: a parallel layered model and multi-actor coordination framework
Ihsan, A. F., Siadari, T. S., Alamsyah, A., Lhaksmana, K. M., & Jumhur, H. M. (2026) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2026.1872620
Ramabina, M., & Nsibirwa, Z. (2026) · Open Information Science · doi:10.1515/opis-2025-0029
When AI Speaks the Curriculum: From Generic Chatbots to Context-Aware Learning Systems
Ahsan, A., McDonald, H., Saha, R., & Davison, C. (2026) · Systems · doi:10.3390/systems14070791 · Cited by 2
Wang, Z., & Zhou, L. (2026) · Journal of Librarianship and Information Science · doi:10.1177/09610006261462964
Self-citationLundkvist, E., Holmström, S., Pérez-Ferreirós, A., & Kalén, A. (2026) · Journal of Sports Sciences · doi:10.1080/02640414.2026.2698238
Giri, U., Sharma, P. B., Lamoria, J., & Pradhan, T. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-92-0960-6_8
Ursavaş, Ö. F., Onan, A., Durak, H. Y., & Akçayir, İ. (2026) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2026.2693955
Early Childhood Educators’ AI Literacy: Validation of the Meta-AI Literacy Scale in a Greek Context
Papadakis, S., Vatou, A., & Andreadakis, Z. (2026) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci16071117 · Cited by 1
Khan, Z. I., Oladokun, B. D., Upadhyay, A. K., & Kalbande, D. (2026) · Journal of Librarianship and Information Science · doi:10.1177/09610006261461309
Lexical Traces of AI : Linguistic Impact of Generative Tools in Academic Abstracts
Forgas, R. C., Torres, C. G., Garma, C. T., & Glynn, A. (2026) · Learned Publishing · doi:10.1002/leap.2067
Park, H. (2026) · The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education · doi:10.32431/kace.2026.29.6.011
Bashir, F., & Khanum, A. (2026) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-981-92-3734-0_15
A Hybrid Time-Series and Generative AI Framework for Scenario-Aware Retail Demand Forecasting
Singarayan, J. P. M. (2026) · International Conference on Computer Networks, Big Data and IoT (ICCBI) · doi:10.1109/iccbi68589.2026.11619692
The Use of ChatGPT in Science Education: A Quantitative Study of Preservice Teachers’ Perceptions
Alarabi, K., Alabidi, S., Alabedi, F., Bouzenoun, A., & AlKhaza’h, M. S. (2026) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Systems (AIS) · doi:10.1109/ais69919.2026.11621152
Işıklı, Ş., & Aslan, A. (2026) · Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies · doi:10.66815/ejecs/3161
Análisis de las tipologías de innovación tecnológica en el profesorado universitario
Cajo, I. M. H., & Latorre-Benalcázar, N. B. (2025) · INNOVATE Research Journal · doi:10.65133/irj.v1.n1.2025/a13 · Cited by 1
Teachers’ adoption of GenAI: a model integrating ethics and creativity
Onbaşılı, Ü. İ., Batı, K., Yetişir, M. İ., & Doğan, C. D. (2026) · Educational Studies · doi:10.1080/03055698.2026.2710334
Tourism and Society 5.0: a conversation with ChatGPT and future research agenda
Koukopoulos, A. (2026) · Journal of Tourism Futures · doi:10.1108/jtf-08-2024-0173
Shahbaz, H., Dad, B., & Saud, S. (2026) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-026-01304-y
Ofem, U. J., Igu, N. C. N., Olom, P. A., Elechi, C. N., Nwinyinya, E., Ebaye, A. S., Odenigbo, V. N., Okenwa, G. N., Eze, T. A., & Ukatu, J. O. (2026) · Discover Global Society · doi:10.1007/s44282-026-00474-8
CiteSure: retrieval-augmented large language models for faithful biomedical citation recommendation
Xie, Q., Zhang, J., Wang, Y., Huang, J., Lin, F., Weng, R.-L., He, H., Chen, Q., & Xu, H. (2026) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocag122
Generative grounded theory ( GGT ): Inductive theory building in the age of generative AI
Schmitt, B., Hao, S., Pham, M. T., & Hofstetter, R. (2026) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1002/jcpy.70036
Suthiprapa, K., & Tuamsuk, K. (2026) · Publications · doi:10.3390/publications14030052
Mekheimer, M. A. A. G., & Abdelhalim, W. (2026) · Discover Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s43621-026-04243-0
Oré, M. C., Montoya, L. M. M., Maldonado, P. A. V., & Tafur, J. B. V. (2026) · Revista Simón Rodríguez · doi:10.62319/simonrodriguez.v.6i12.202
Khan, Z. I., Haque, I., & Raza, M. M. (2026) · Journal of Information Science · doi:10.1177/01655515261476222
Li, R. (2026) · Reference Services Review · doi:10.1108/rsr-01-2026-0012
ChatGPT in the literature: A bibliometric analysis
Arık, M. A., Yalman, A., LİVBERBER, T., Aydoğan, H., Şeker, T., & Şeker, M. (2026) · Journal of Information Science · doi:10.1177/01655515261476215
Can Generative AI Assist Post-publication Peer Review? A Pilot Study on LLM-assisted Triage
Nazarovets, S., & da Silva, J. A. T. (2026) · Journal of Academic Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10805-026-09761-0 · Cited by 1
Velioğlu, Y. M., Velioğlu, H., Olum, S., & Arkin, A. K. (2026) · Denetişim · doi:10.58348/denetisim.1961018
Ding, Z., Li, X., Li, X., & Zhu, W. (2026) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-026-09967-w
Morton, J. L., & Pocaterra, M. M. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-10657303/v1
A Systematic Bibliometric Review of Artificial Intelligence and Information Literacy Research
Κουτσουπιάς, Ν., & Nosios, M. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-7262-4.ch001
AI-Based 3D Visualization in Libraries
Gupta, D., Gayratovich, E. N., Meylikulov, S., Urozboev, K., Gulzar, J., Madaminov, B., & Pasipamire, E. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-7262-4.ch011
Artificial Intelligence in Library Management
Priya, S., Thirumal, S., Sithik, M. M., Santhoshkumar, S. P., Ramamoorthi, S., & Kumar, M. S. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-7262-4.ch006
¿Quién escribe y quién conoce? Escritura científica en tiempos de inteligencia artificial
Perinés, H. (2026) · Pedagogical Constellation · doi:10.69821/constellations.v5i2.200
Ayinde, L. A., Katta, K., & Adebayo, J. O. (2026) · Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management · doi:10.1108/jstpm-01-2025-0010
Khoshgoftar, Z., Ghaiyoomi, S., & Alaee, A. (2026) · Journal of Education and Health Promotion · doi:10.4103/jehp.jehp_719_25
Combining probabilistic features and semantic features for AI-Generated text detection
Yu, Y., & Gao, W. (2026) · International Journal of Scientific Research and Management (IJSRM) · doi:10.18535/ijsrm/v14i09.ec01
Краткий обзор возможностей нейронной сети DeepSeek в прикладной математике
Полянин, А. Д., & Shingareva, I. K. (2026) · Вестник НИЯУ МИФИ · doi:10.26583/vestnik.2026.4.4
Wu, J. (2026) · International Conference on Computer Information and Big Data Applications (CIBDA) · doi:10.1145/3813822.3814094
Grájeda, A., Olivera, P. C., Córdova, J. P., Pueyo, M., Gasser, P., Taborga, I. L. F., & Naranjo-Ávalos, H. (2026) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs16091554
From Libraries to Language Models: Exploring PhD Students’ Digital Research Tool Adoption
Subaveerapandiyan, A., Seifi, L., & Ahmad, N. (2026) · Serials Review · doi:10.1080/00987913.2026.2720382
Charaan, R. M. D., Ganapathy, S., Nalini, T., Therasa, P. R., Siddik, S., & Jayakumar, M. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-2600-4050-8.ch004
Kamińska, A. M. (2026) · Zagadnienia Informacji Naukowej - Studia Informacyjne · doi:10.36702/zin2026.01.02
Metadata
- Authors
- Lund, B. D., Wang, T., Mannuru, N. R., Nie, B., Shimray, S., & Wang, Z.
- Affiliations
- University of North Texas (US)
- Emporia State University (US)
- Zhejiang Tongji Vocational College of Science and Technology (CN)
- Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University (IN)
- Baker University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lund, Brady D.
- Venue
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2023-03-10
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 570-581
- ISSN
- 2330-1635 (ISSN-L)
- 2330-1643
- OpenAlex
- W4323848232
- Cited by
- 919
- References
- 97
- Citations by year
- 2026: 171 · 2025: 293 · 2024: 282 · 2023: 173
- FWCI
- 230.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Education › Academic integrity and plagiarism
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Publishing and Scholarly Communication
- Keywords
- ChatGPT, large language models, generative AI, academic writing, scholarly publishing, research ethics, AI-generated text, GPT-3, natural language processing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
