The DOI matches its Crossref record; 99 of the 99 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ChatGPT and a new academic reality: Artificial Intelligence‐written research papers and the ethics of the large language models in scholarly publishing
Open accessAbstract
Abstract This article discusses OpenAI's ChatGPT, a generative pre‐trained transformer, which uses natural language processing to fulfill text‐based user requests (i.e., a “chatbot”). The history and principles behind ChatGPT and similar models are discussed. This technology is then discussed in relation to its potential impact on academia and scholarly research and publishing. ChatGPT is seen as a potential model for the automated preparation of essays and other types of scholarly manuscripts. Potential ethical issues that could arise with the emergence of large language models like GPT‐3, the underlying technology behind ChatGPT, and its usage by academics and researchers, are discussed and situated within the context of broader advancements in artificial intelligence, machine learning, and natural language processing for research and scholarly publishing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Many authors have expressed concern that students are submitting papers generated by ChatGPT and other AI tools as their own original work, thereby attaining the performance goal but bypassing the learning goal.”
From The Effectiveness of Software Designed to Detect AI-Generated Writing: A Comparison of 16 AI Text Detectors (2023) · cites this paper as Lund et al., 2023
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This forecast supports claims made by other scholars, who argue that LLMs will help automate mundane tasks and free up space for creative thinking (Lund et al. 2023;Dwivedi et al. 2023).”
From Friend or foe? Exploring the implications of large language models on the science system (2025) · cites this paper as Lund et al. 2023
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This is due to concern centered on plagiarism because it is challenging to trace and verify the originality of AI-generated content [59, 60].”
From Generative artificial intelligence (GAI) usage guidelines for scholarly publishing: a cross-sectional study of medical journals (2025) · cites this paper as [59]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“They are discussed not only as tools for writing, summarizing, or retrieving scientific texts, but also as systems that may help evaluate research quality, generate manuscript feedback, and support peer review workflows (Kousha & Thelwall, 2025;Lund et al., 2023;Thelwall, 2025a).”
From Beyond Human-Likeness: Mapping the Scientific Critique Profiles of LLMs and Human Reviewers (2026) · cites this paper as Lund et al., 2023
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“This uncritical dependence not only hinders the development of critical thinking skills [6], [7].”
From A Meta-Synthesis of Factual Accuracy and Citation Hallucination in LLM Academic Assistants (2026) · cites this paper as [7]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Misattribution can lead to wrongful accusations or misinterpretation of an author's intent [Lund et al., 2023].”
From Authorship Attribution in the Era of LLMs: Problems, Methodologies, and Challenges (2025) · cites this paper as Lund et al., 2023
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“Finding answers to this question is urgent as LLMs are already starting to permeate the academic landscape (10–17).”
From How should the advancement of large language models affect the practice of science? (2025) · cites this paper as [14]
In the citing paper
“This outcome resonates with the scholarly discourse which highlights how generative AI can be used to enhance texts, such as with brainstorming (Staiman 2023), crafting literature reviews (Lucey and Dowling 2023), and improving text clarity (Lund et al. 2023).”
From Friend or foe? Exploring the implications of large language models on the science system (2025) · cites this paper as Lund et al. 2023
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.04805 · Cited by 73,173
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.14165 · Cited by 23,372
RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach
Liu, Y., Ott, M., Goyal, N., Du, J., Joshi, M., Chen, D., Levy, O., Lewis, M., Zettlemoyer, L., & Stoyanov, V. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.11692 · Cited by 16,515
Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects
Jordan, M. I., & Mitchell, T. M. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa8415 · Cited by 9,955
On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big? 🦜
Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3442188.3445922 · Cited by 6,988 · cited 1×
“Although ChatGPT's massive Internet data set offers a wide range of perspectives and voices, Emily Bender, a computational linguist, has noted that size does not guarantee diversity (Bender et al., 2021).”
BackgroundThe Matthew Effect in Science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered.
Merton, R. K. (1968) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.159.3810.56 · Cited by 6,720
XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understanding
Yang, Z., Dai, Z., Yang, Y., Carbonell, J., Salakhutdinov, R., & Le, Q. V. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1906.08237 · Cited by 6,687
The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines
Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2 · Cited by 6,220
(1968) · PubMed · Cited by 4,803
Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLP
Strubell, E., Ganesh, A., & McCallum, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1355 · Cited by 3,684
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Alutto J. A., 2008, Final report of the AACSB international impact of research task force
- Beath C., 2012, Finding value in the information explosion, MIT Sloan Management Review, 53, 18
- Caplow T., 1958, The academic marketplace
- 10.1080/08989621.2023.216853 · DOI
- Lokman A. S., 2018, Proceedings of the future technologies conference, 1012
- Müller V. C., 2021, The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (summer 2021)
- Olsson A. &Engelbrektsson O.(2022).A thesis that writes itself: On the threat of AI‐generated essays within academia(Bachelor thesis).https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1669744/FULLTEXT02
- Yanisky‐Ravid S., 2017, Generating Rembrandt: Artificial intelligence, copyright, and accountability in the 3A Era: The human‐like authors are already here, Michigan State Law Review, 659
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ooi, K.-B., Tan, G. W.-H., Al-Emran, M., Al-Sharafi, M. A., Capatina, A., Chakraborty, A., Dwivedi, Y. K., Huang, T.-L., Kar, A. K., Lee, V.-H., et al. (2025) · Journal of Computer Information Systems · doi:10.1080/08874417.2023.2261010 · Cited by 746
Generative artificial intelligence
Banh, L., & Strobel, G. (2023) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-023-00680-1 · Cited by 879
Yenduri, G., Ramalingam, M., Selvi, G. C., Supriya, Y., Srivastava, G., Maddikunta, P. K. R., Raj, G. D., Jhaveri, R. H., Prabadevi, B., Wang, W., et al. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3389497 · Cited by 916
The role of ChatGPT in higher education: Benefits, challenges, and future research directions
(2023) · Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching · doi:10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.29 · Cited by 561
(2023) · doi:10.3390/app13116716 · Cited by 465
Self-citationFabrication and errors in the bibliographic citations generated by ChatGPT
Walters, W. H., & Wilder, E. I. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-41032-5 · Cited by 499
Strzelecki, A. (2024) · Innovative Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10755-023-09686-1 · Cited by 477
“Interviews explore its potential in improving content creation and academic research, with a focus on ethical implications (Lund & Wang, 2023; Pavlik, 2023).”
Determinants of Intention to Use ChatGPT for Educational Purposes: Findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA
Foroughi, B., Senali, M. G., Iranmanesh, M., Khanfar, A. A. A., Ghobakhloo, M., Annamalai, N., & Naghmeh‐Abbaspour, B. (2023) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2023.2226495 · Cited by 510
Imran, M., & Almusharraf, N. (2023) · Contemporary Educational Technology · doi:10.30935/cedtech/13605 · Cited by 421
Human-AI collaboration patterns in AI-assisted academic writing
Nguyen, A., Hong, Y., Dang, B., & Huang, X. (2024) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2024.2323593 · Cited by 449
“…breakthroughs has been shown to enhance learning experiences, nurture creativity, and streamline knowledge management, there are growing concerns about their implications for academic integrity and the possible erosion of academic writing skills (Kasneci et al. 2023; Lund et al. 2023).”
BackgroundA Survey on Large Language Models: Applications, Challenges, Limitations, and Practical UsagePreprint
Hadi, M. U., Al-Tashi, Q., Qureshi, R., Shah, A., Muneer, A., Irfan, M., Zafar, A., Shaikh, M. B., Akhtar, N., Hassan, S. Z., et al. (2023) · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.23589741.v1 · Cited by 475
Mannuru, N. R., Shahriar, S., Teel, Z. A., Wang, T., Lund, B. D., Tijani, S., Pohboon, C. O., Agbaji, D. A., Alhassan, J., Galley, J., et al. (2023) · Information Development · doi:10.1177/02666669231200628 · Cited by 426
Self-citationAli, O., Murray, P. A., Momin, M., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Malik, T. (2024) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123076 · Cited by 317
Saif, N., Khan, S. U., Shaheen, I., ALotaibi, F. A., Alnfiai, M. M., & Arif, M. (2024) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2023.108097 · Cited by 301
Liu, M., Zhang, L. J., & Biebricher, C. (2023) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104977 · Cited by 397
Çelik, İ. (2023) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2023.102026 · Cited by 362
ChatGPT in education: Methods, potentials, and limitations
Memarian, B., & Doleck, T. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans · doi:10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100022 · Cited by 266
Drivers and Consequences of ChatGPT Use in Higher Education: Key Stakeholder Perspectives
Hasanein, A. M., & Sobaih, A. E. E. (2023) · European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education · doi:10.3390/ejihpe13110181 · Cited by 366
Strzelecki, A., & ElArabawy, S. (2024) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13425 · Cited by 260
Paoli, S. D. (2023) · Social Science Computer Review · doi:10.1177/08944393231220483 · Cited by 357
ChatGPT: Vision and challenges
Gill, S. S., & Kaur, R. (2023) · Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems · doi:10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.05.004 · Cited by 294
Bozkurt, A. (2024) · Open Praxis · doi:10.55982/openpraxis.16.1.654 · Cited by 215
Sohail, S. S., Farhat, F., Himeur, Y., Nadeem, M., Madsen, D. Ø., Singh, Y., Atalla, S., & Mansoor, W. (2023) · Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jksuci.2023.101675 · Cited by 192
Exploring the dimensions of ChatGPT in English language learning: a global perspective
Bin-Hady, W. R. A., Al-kadi, A. M. T., Hazaea, A. N., & Ali, J. K. M. (2023) · Library Hi Tech · doi:10.1108/lht-05-2023-0200 · Cited by 181
Hadi, M. U., Al-Tashi, Q., Qureshi, R., Shah, A., Muneer, A., Irfan, M., Zafar, A., Shaikh, M. B., Akhtar, N., Hassan, S. Z., et al. (2023) · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.23589741.v4 · Cited by 193
Artificial intelligence to support publishing and peer review: A summary and review
Kousha, K., & Thelwall, M. (2023) · Learned Publishing · doi:10.1002/leap.1570 · Cited by 162
Sison, A. J. G., Daza, M. T., Gozalo-Brizuela, R., & Garrido-Merchán, E. C. (2024) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2023.2225931 · Cited by 169
Wang, N., Wang, X., & Su, Y.-S. (2024) · Asia Pacific Journal of Education · doi:10.1080/02188791.2024.2305156 · Cited by 225
Shahriar, S., Lund, B. D., Mannuru, N. R., Arshad, M., Hayawi, K., Bevara, R. V. K., Mannuru, A., & Batool, L. (2024) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app14177782 · Cited by 211
Self-citationTang, A., Li, K., Kwok, K. O., Cao, L., Luong, S., & Tam, W. (2024) · Journal of Nursing Scholarship · doi:10.1111/jnu.12938 · Cited by 159
ChatGPT for Automated Qualitative Research: Content Analysis
Bijker, R., Merkouris, S., Dowling, N. A., & Rodda, S. N. (2024) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/59050 · Cited by 224
Assessing the nexus of Generative AI adoption, ethical considerations and organizational performance
Rana, N. P., Pillai, R., Sivathanu, B., & Malik, N. (2024) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103064 · Cited by 199
Lieberum, J.-L., Toews, M., Metzendorf, M.-I., Heilmeyer, F., Siemens, W., Haverkamp, C., Böhringer, D., Meerpohl, J. J., & Eisele-Metzger, A. (2025) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111746 · Cited by 148
A Culturally Sensitive Test to Evaluate Nuanced GPT Hallucination
McIntosh, T. R., Liu, T., Susnjak, T., Watters, P., Ng, A., & Halgamuge, M. N. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tai.2023.3332837 · Cited by 145
ChatGPT in education: a discourse analysis of worries and concerns on social media
Li, L., Ma, Z., Fan, L., Lee, S., Yu, H., & Hemphill, L. (2023) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-023-12256-9 · Cited by 218
Akpan, I. J., Kobara, Y. M., Owolabi, J., Akpan, A. A., & Offodile, O. F. (2024) · International Transactions in Operational Research · doi:10.1111/itor.13522 · Cited by 187
Velasquez, J. D., Franco, C. J., & Cadavid, L. (2023) · DYNA · doi:10.15446/dyna.v90n230.111700 · Cited by 171
Christou, P. (2023) · The Qualitative Report · doi:10.46743/2160-3715/2023.6406 · Cited by 226
Yang, Y., Luo, J., Yang, M., Yang, R., & Chen, J. (2024) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2024.2327003 · Cited by 129
Raj, R., Singh, A., Kumar, V., & Verma, P. (2023) · BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks Standards and Evaluations · doi:10.1016/j.tbench.2023.100140 · Cited by 179
Employing large language models in survey research
Jansen, B. J. J., Jung, S., & Salminen, J. O. (2023) · Natural Language Processing Journal · doi:10.1016/j.nlp.2023.100020 · Cited by 151
AI and its implications for research in higher education: a critical dialogue
Butson, R., & Spronken-Smith, R. (2024) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360.2023.2280200 · Cited by 130
Almulla, M. A. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32220 · Cited by 174
ChatGPT and the Future of Academic Integrity in the Artificial Intelligence Era: A New Frontier
Mijwil, M. M., Hiran, K. K., Doshi, R., Dadhich, M., Al-Mistarehi, A.-H. W., & Bala, I. (2023) · Al-Salam Journal for Engineering and Technology · doi:10.55145/ajest.2023.02.02.015 · Cited by 149
AI Chatbots in Education: Challenges and Opportunities
Davar, N. F., Dewan, M. A. A., & Zhang, X. (2025) · Information · doi:10.3390/info16030235 · Cited by 123
Opportunities, Challenges, and Strategies for Using ChatGPT in Higher Education: A Literature Review
Sok, S., & Heng, K. (2024) · Journal of Digital Educational Technology · doi:10.30935/jdet/14027 · Cited by 120
“…recent research has highlighted various issues concerning the use of ChatGPT, including the risks of privacy and ethical issues (Chukwuere, 2023; Lund & Wang, 2023), misinformation about science or distribution of fake or inaccurate content (Liebrenz et al., 2023), biased responses or outputs…”
BackgroundGhafouri, M., Hassaskhah, J., & Zafarghandi, A. M. (2024) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/13621688241239764 · Cited by 154
Addressing 6 challenges in generative AI for digital health: A scoping review
Templin, T., Perez, M. W., Sylvia, S., Leek, J. T., & Sinnott-Armstrong, N. (2024) · PLOS Digital Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000503 · Cited by 129
A comprehensive review of large language models: issues and solutions in learning environments
Shahzad, T., Mazhar, T., Tariq, M. U., Ahmad, W., Ouahada, K., & Hamam, H. (2025) · Discover Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s43621-025-00815-8 · Cited by 154
Large Language Model‐Based Chatbots in Higher Education
Yigci, D., Eryilmaz, M., Yetisen, A. K., Tasoglu, S., & Ozcan, A. (2025) · Advanced Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1002/aisy.202400429 · Cited by 113
Walters, W. H. (2023) · Open Information Science · doi:10.1515/opis-2022-0158 · Cited by 109
Demir, M., & Demir, Ş. Ş. (2023) · Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing · doi:10.1080/10548408.2023.2255884 · Cited by 122
Qadhi, S. M., Alduais, A., Chaaban, Y., & Khraisheh, M. (2024) · Information · doi:10.3390/info15060325 · Cited by 106
Acceptance and use of ChatGPT in the academic community
Strzelecki, A., Cicha, K., Rizun, M., & Rutecka, P. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-12765-1 · Cited by 105
The impact of Artificial Intelligence in academia: Views of Turkish academics on ChatGPT
Livberber, T., & Ayvaz, S. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19688 · Cited by 103
Lund, B. D., & Naheem, K. T. (2023) · Learned Publishing · doi:10.1002/leap.1582 · Cited by 136
Self-citationA scoping review of ChatGPT's role in healthcare education and research
Shorey, S., Mattar, C., Pereira, T. L.-B., & Choolani, M. (2024) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106121 · Cited by 96
Empowering design innovation using AI-generated content
Jin, J., Yang, M., Hu, H., Guo, X., Luo, J., & Liu, Y. (2024) · Journal of Engineering Design · doi:10.1080/09544828.2024.2401751 · Cited by 96
A review of the potential opportunities and challenges of the digital economy for sustainability
Raihan, A. (2024) · Innovation and Green Development · doi:10.1016/j.igd.2024.100174 · Cited by 95
Examining Students’ Acceptance and Use of ChatGPT in Saudi Arabian Higher Education
Sobaih, A. E. E., Elshaer, I. A., & Hasanein, A. M. (2024) · European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education · doi:10.3390/ejihpe14030047 · Cited by 123
ICT students' perceptions towards ChatGPT: An experimental reflective lab analysis
Elkhodr, M., Gide, E., Wu, M., & Darwish, O. (2023) · STEM Education · doi:10.3934/steme.2023006 · Cited by 135
AI in higher education: a systematic literature review
Castillo-Martínez, I. M., Flores-Bueno, D., Gómez-Puente, S. M., & Vite-León, V. O. (2024) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2024.1391485 · Cited by 96
Evaluating AI Literacy in Academic Libraries: A Survey Study with a Focus on U.S. Employees
Lo, L. S. (2024) · College & Research Libraries · doi:10.5860/crl.85.5.635 · Cited by 133
The Changing Role of Higher Education in the Era of AI-based GPTs
Aithal, P. S., & Aithal, S. (2023) · International Journal of Case Studies in Business IT and Education · doi:10.47992/ijcsbe.2581.6942.0267 · Cited by 91
Analyzing ChatGPT adoption drivers with the TOEK framework
Jo, H., & Bang, Y. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-49710-0 · Cited by 99
ChatGPT: The brightest student in the class
Cano, E. V., Ramírez‐Hurtado, J. M., López, J. M. S., & Menéses, E. L. (2023) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101380 · Cited by 105
Jo, H. (2023) · Information Development · doi:10.1177/02666669231202764 · Cited by 106
Navigating LLM ethics: advancements, challenges, and future directions
Jiao, J., Afroogh, S., Xu, Y., & Phillips, C. (2025) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-025-00814-5 · Cited by 171
Seth, I., Lim, B., Xie, Y., Cevik, J., Rozen, W. M., Ross, R. J., & Lee, M. (2023) · Aesthetic Surgery Journal Open Forum · doi:10.1093/asjof/ojad084 · Cited by 86
Darmawansah, D., Rachman, D., Febiyani, F., & Hwang, G. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-12986-4 · Cited by 96
Yang, T.-C., Hsu, Y.-C., & Wu, J.-Y. (2025) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2025.2450659 · Cited by 80
Friend or foe? Exploring the implications of large language models on the science system
Fecher, B., Hebing, M., Laufer, M., Pohle, J., & Sofsky, F. (2025) · AI & SOCIETY · doi:10.1007/s00146-023-01791-1 · Cited by 78
“Errors may also occur in interpreting meaning, in particular if terms are ambiguous, have multiple meanings or consist of compound words (Lund et al. 2023).”
InfluentialLozić, E., & Štular, B. (2023) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi15100336 · Cited by 115
The Future of Material Scientists in an Age of Artificial Intelligence
Maqsood, A., Chen, C., & Jacobsson, T. J. (2024) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.202401401 · Cited by 82
Spennemann, D. H. R. (2023) · Knowledge · doi:10.3390/knowledge3030032 · Cited by 93
A Cross Sectional Study of ChatGPT in Translation: Magnitude of Use, Attitudes, and Uncertainties
Sahari, Y., Al-kadi, A. M. T., & Ali, J. K. M. (2023) · Journal of Psycholinguistic Research · doi:10.1007/s10936-023-10031-y · Cited by 77
Students' reflections on their experience with ChatGPT
Šedlbauer, J., Činčera, J., Slavík, M., & Hartlová, A. (2024) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12967 · Cited by 71
Bukar, U. A., Sayeed, M. S., Razak, A., Yogarayan, S., & Sneesl, R. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3425172 · Cited by 92
Suchikova, Y., Tsybuliak, N., Teixeira da Silva, J. A., & Nazarovets, S. (2026) · Accountability in Research · doi:10.1080/08989621.2025.2544331 · Cited by 70
Haider, J., Söderström, K. R., Ekström, B., & Rödl, M. (2024) · Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review · doi:10.37016/mr-2020-156 · Cited by 70
Kong, S. C., Lee, J. C., & Tsang, O. (2024) · Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning · doi:10.58459/rptel.2024.19030 · Cited by 115
Perceptions of Higher Education Students towards ChatGPT Usage
Das, S. R., & Madhusudan, J. V. (2024) · International Journal of Technology in Education · doi:10.46328/ijte.583 · Cited by 103
How should the advancement of large language models affect the practice of science?
Binz, M., Alaniz, S., Roskies, A., Aczel, B., Bergstrom, C. T., Allen, C., Schad, D., Wulff, D., West, J. D., Zhang, Q., et al. (2025) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2401227121 · Cited by 74
Shin, H., & Kang, J. (2023) · Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.jhtm.2023.09.001 · Cited by 76
The beginning of ChatGPT – a systematic and bibliometric review of the literature
Baber, H., Nair, K., Gupta, R. S., & Gurjar, K. (2023) · Information and Learning Sciences · doi:10.1108/ils-04-2023-0035 · Cited by 88
Gupta, P., Mahajan, R., Badhera, U., & Kushwaha, P. S. (2024) · The International Journal of Management Education · doi:10.1016/j.ijme.2024.101017 · Cited by 80
Application of ChatGPT in Higher Education and Research – A Futuristic Analysis
Aithal, P. S., & Aithal, S. (2023) · International Journal of Applied Engineering and Management Letters · doi:10.47992/ijaeml.2581.7000.0193 · Cited by 71
Formosa, P., Bankins, S., Matulionytė, R., & Ghasemi, O. (2024) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-024-02081-0 · Cited by 98
Bridging the gap – the impact of ChatGPT on financial research
Cao, Y., & Zhai, J. (2023) · Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies · doi:10.1080/14765284.2023.2212434 · Cited by 75
Introduction to large language models (LLMs) for dementia care and research
Treder, M. S., Lee, S., & Tsvetanov, K. A. (2024) · Frontiers in Dementia · doi:10.3389/frdem.2024.1385303 · Cited by 63
Analyzing Sentiments Regarding ChatGPT Using Novel BERT: A Machine Learning Approach
Sudheesh, R., Mujahid, M., Rustam, F., Shafique, R., Chunduri, V., Villar, M. G., Ballester, J. B., Díez, I. D. L. T., & Ashraf, I. (2023) · Information · doi:10.3390/info14090474 · Cited by 75
Arpacı, İ. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2023.3339578 · Cited by 67
Hadan, H., Wang, D., Mogavi, R. H., Tu, J., Zhang-Kennedy, L., & Nacke, L. E. (2024) · Computers in Human Behavior Artificial Humans · doi:10.1016/j.chbah.2024.100095 · Cited by 74
Guizani, S., Mazhar, T., Shahzad, T., Ahmad, W., Bibi, A., & Hamam, H. (2025) · Discover Education · doi:10.1007/s44217-025-00424-7 · Cited by 99
Malik, A., Khan, M. L., & Hussain, K. (2023) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4413516 · Cited by 59
Generative Artificial Intelligence and Language Teaching
Moorhouse, B. L., & Wong, K. M. (2025) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009618823 · Cited by 84
Márquez, R., BARRIOS, N. A., Vera, R. E., Mendez, M. E., Tolosa, L. I., Zambrano, F., & Li, Y. (2023) · Education for Chemical Engineers · doi:10.1016/j.ece.2023.05.005 · Cited by 80
ChatGPT and other AI Users: Innovative and Creative Utilitarian Value and Mindset Shift
Duhaylungsod, A. V., & Chavez, J. V. (2023) · Journal of Namibian Studies : History Politics Culture · doi:10.59670/jns.v33i.2791 · Cited by 59
ChatGPT 3.5 fails to write appropriate multiple choice practice exam questions
Ngo, A., Gupta, S., Perrine, O., Reddy, R., Ershadi, S., & Remick, D. G. (2023) · Academic Pathology · doi:10.1016/j.acpath.2023.100099 · Cited by 59
Emerging Research and Policy Themes on Academic Integrity in the Age of Chat GPT and Generative AI
Plata, S., De Guzman, M. A., & Quesada, A. (2023) · Asian Journal of University Education · doi:10.24191/ajue.v19i4.24697 · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- Lund, B. D., Wang, T., Mannuru, N. R., Nie, B., Shimray, S., & Wang, Z.
- Affiliations
- University of North Texas (US)
- Emporia State University (US)
- Zhejiang Tongji Vocational College of Science and Technology (CN)
- Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University (IN)
- Baker University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lund, Brady D.
- Venue
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2023-03-10
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 570-581
- ISSN
- 2330-1635 (ISSN-L)
- 2330-1643
- OpenAlex
- W4323848232
- Cited by
- 919
- References
- 97
- Citations by year
- 2026: 171 · 2025: 293 · 2024: 282 · 2023: 173
- FWCI
- 230.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Education › Academic integrity and plagiarism
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Publishing and Scholarly Communication
- Keywords
- ChatGPT, large language models, generative AI, academic writing, scholarly publishing, research ethics, AI-generated text, GPT-3, natural language processing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
