The DOI matches its Crossref record; 99 of the 99 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ChatGPT and a new academic reality: Artificial Intelligence‐written research papers and the ethics of the large language models in scholarly publishing
Open accessAbstract
Abstract This article discusses OpenAI's ChatGPT, a generative pre‐trained transformer, which uses natural language processing to fulfill text‐based user requests (i.e., a “chatbot”). The history and principles behind ChatGPT and similar models are discussed. This technology is then discussed in relation to its potential impact on academia and scholarly research and publishing. ChatGPT is seen as a potential model for the automated preparation of essays and other types of scholarly manuscripts. Potential ethical issues that could arise with the emergence of large language models like GPT‐3, the underlying technology behind ChatGPT, and its usage by academics and researchers, are discussed and situated within the context of broader advancements in artificial intelligence, machine learning, and natural language processing for research and scholarly publishing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Many authors have expressed concern that students are submitting papers generated by ChatGPT and other AI tools as their own original work, thereby attaining the performance goal but bypassing the learning goal.”
From The Effectiveness of Software Designed to Detect AI-Generated Writing: A Comparison of 16 AI Text Detectors (2023) · cites this paper as Lund et al., 2023
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This is due to concern centered on plagiarism because it is challenging to trace and verify the originality of AI-generated content [59, 60].”
From Generative artificial intelligence (GAI) usage guidelines for scholarly publishing: a cross-sectional study of medical journals (2025) · cites this paper as [59]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“They are discussed not only as tools for writing, summarizing, or retrieving scientific texts, but also as systems that may help evaluate research quality, generate manuscript feedback, and support peer review workflows (Kousha & Thelwall, 2025;Lund et al., 2023;Thelwall, 2025a).”
From Beyond Human-Likeness: Mapping the Scientific Critique Profiles of LLMs and Human Reviewers (2026) · cites this paper as Lund et al., 2023
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“This uncritical dependence not only hinders the development of critical thinking skills [6], [7].”
From A Meta-Synthesis of Factual Accuracy and Citation Hallucination in LLM Academic Assistants (2026) · cites this paper as [7]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Misattribution can lead to wrongful accusations or misinterpretation of an author's intent [Lund et al., 2023].”
From Authorship Attribution in the Era of LLMs: Problems, Methodologies, and Challenges (2025) · cites this paper as Lund et al., 2023
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
In the citing paper
“Finding answers to this question is urgent as LLMs are already starting to permeate the academic landscape (10–17).”
From How should the advancement of large language models affect the practice of science? (2025) · cites this paper as [14]
In the citing paper
“This forecast supports claims made by other scholars, who argue that LLMs will help automate mundane tasks and free up space for creative thinking (Lund et al. 2023;Dwivedi et al. 2023).”
From Friend or foe? Exploring the implications of large language models on the science system (2025) · cites this paper as Lund et al. 2023
In the citing paper
“This outcome resonates with the scholarly discourse which highlights how generative AI can be used to enhance texts, such as with brainstorming (Staiman 2023), crafting literature reviews (Lucey and Dowling 2023), and improving text clarity (Lund et al. 2023).”
From Friend or foe? Exploring the implications of large language models on the science system (2025) · cites this paper as Lund et al. 2023
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.04805 · Cited by 73,173
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.14165 · Cited by 23,372
RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach
Liu, Y., Ott, M., Goyal, N., Du, J., Joshi, M., Chen, D., Levy, O., Lewis, M., Zettlemoyer, L., & Stoyanov, V. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.11692 · Cited by 16,515
Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects
Jordan, M. I., & Mitchell, T. M. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa8415 · Cited by 9,955
On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big? 🦜
Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3442188.3445922 · Cited by 6,988 · cited 1×
“Although ChatGPT's massive Internet data set offers a wide range of perspectives and voices, Emily Bender, a computational linguist, has noted that size does not guarantee diversity (Bender et al., 2021).”
BackgroundThe Matthew Effect in Science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered.
Merton, R. K. (1968) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.159.3810.56 · Cited by 6,720
XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understanding
Yang, Z., Dai, Z., Yang, Y., Carbonell, J., Salakhutdinov, R., & Le, Q. V. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1906.08237 · Cited by 6,687
The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines
Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2 · Cited by 6,220
(1968) · PubMed · Cited by 4,803
Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLP
Strubell, E., Ganesh, A., & McCallum, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1355 · Cited by 3,684
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Alutto J. A., 2008, Final report of the AACSB international impact of research task force
- Beath C., 2012, Finding value in the information explosion, MIT Sloan Management Review, 53, 18
- Caplow T., 1958, The academic marketplace
- 10.1080/08989621.2023.216853 · DOI
- Lokman A. S., 2018, Proceedings of the future technologies conference, 1012
- Müller V. C., 2021, The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (summer 2021)
- Olsson A. &Engelbrektsson O.(2022).A thesis that writes itself: On the threat of AI‐generated essays within academia(Bachelor thesis).https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1669744/FULLTEXT02
- Yanisky‐Ravid S., 2017, Generating Rembrandt: Artificial intelligence, copyright, and accountability in the 3A Era: The human‐like authors are already here, Michigan State Law Review, 659
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 923
Luo, X., Zhang, A., Li, Y., Zhang, Z., Ying, F., Lin, R., Yang, Q., Wang, J., & Huang, G. (2024) · International Journal of Mental Health Nursing · doi:10.1111/inm.13384 · Cited by 26
Virtual Tutor, Digital Natives and AI: Analyzing the impact of ChatGPT on academia in Indonesia
Margono, H., Saud, M., & Falahat, M. (2024) · Social Sciences & Humanities Open · doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101069 · Cited by 26
Saleh, Y., Talib, M. W. A., Nasir, Q., & Dakalbab, F. M. (2025) · Frontiers in Computer Science · doi:10.3389/fcomp.2025.1523699 · Cited by 46
Can you tell the difference? A study of human vs machine-translated subtitles
Calvo‐Ferrer, J. R. (2023) · Perspectives · doi:10.1080/0907676x.2023.2268149 · Cited by 49
Danish university policies on generative AI: Problems, assumptions and sustainability blind spots
Driessens, O., & Pischetola, M. (2024) · MedieKultur: Journal of media and communication research · doi:10.7146/mk.v40i76.143595 · Cited by 25
A classification framework for generative artificial intelligence for social good
Crumbly, J., Pal, R., & Nezih Altay, A. (2024) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103129 · Cited by 28
Scholarly Discourse on GenAI’s Impact on Academic Publishing
Dwivedi, Y. K., Malik, T., Hughes, L., & Albashrawi, M. A. (2024) · Journal of Computer Information Systems · doi:10.1080/08874417.2024.2435386 · Cited by 38
Belda-Medina, J. R., & Kokošková, V. (2024) · Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.1080/17501229.2024.2435900 · Cited by 40
Hsu, H.-P. (2023) · Irish Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning · doi:10.22554/ijtel.v7i2.152 · Cited by 39
Dolunay, A., & Temel, A. C. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1363174 · Cited by 25
How is ChatGPT acknowledged in academic publications?
Kousha, K. (2024) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-024-05193-y · Cited by 23
Emerging Dynamics of ChatGPT in Academia: A Scoping Review
Mahrishi, M., Abbas, A., Radovanović, D., & Hosseini, S. (2024) · Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice · doi:10.53761/b182ws13 · Cited by 28
Oh, P. S., & Lee, G.-G. (2024) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-024-00515-1 · Cited by 28
Jain, R. K., & Jain, A. (2024) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-66329-1_42 · Cited by 62
Ghimire, S. N., Bhattarai, U., & Baral, R. K. (2024) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360.2024.2366323 · Cited by 23
Abdi, A.-N. M., Omar, A. M., Ahmed, M. H., & Ahmed, A. A. (2025) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2025.2460250 · Cited by 30
Farinosi, M., & Melchior, C. (2025) · European Journal of Education · doi:10.1111/ejed.70094 · Cited by 23
Rise of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Science
Ding, L., Lawson, C., & Shapira, P. (2024) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-025-05413-z · Cited by 41
Navigating Generative AI: The Teacher Librarian's Role in Cultivating Ethical and Critical Practices
Oddone, K., Garrison, K., & Gagen-Spriggs, K. (2023) · Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association · doi:10.1080/24750158.2023.2289093 · Cited by 31
Bibliometric Overview of ChatGPT: New Perspectives in Social Sciences
Oliński, M., Krukowski, K., & Sieciński, K. (2024) · Publications · doi:10.3390/publications12010009 · Cited by 31
ChatGPT Code Detection: Techniques for Uncovering the Source of Code
Oedingen, M., Engelhardt, R. C., Denz, R., Hammer, M., & Konen, W. (2024) · AI · doi:10.3390/ai5030053 · Cited by 32
Academic publisher guidelines on AI usage: A ChatGPT supported thematic analysis
Perkins, M., & Roe, J. (2023) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.142411.1 · Cited by 120
An analysis of the generative AI use as analyst in qualitative research in science education
dos Anjos, J. R., de Souza, M. G., Neto, A. S. D. A., & de Souza, B. C. (2024) · Revista Pesquisa Qualitativa · doi:10.33361/rpq.2024.v.12.n.30.724 · Cited by 31
Yin, S., Huang, S., Xue, P., Xu, Z., Lian, Z., Ye, C., Ma, S., Liu, M., Hu, Y., Lu, P., et al. (2025) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-025-03899-1 · Cited by 21
Widen the debate: What is the academic community’s perception on ChatGPT?
Jiang, Y., Xie, L., Lin, G., & Mo, F. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-12677-0 · Cited by 21
Enhancing abstractive summarization of scientific papers using structure information
Bao, T., Zhang, H., & Zhang, C. (2024) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2024.125529 · Cited by 22
Koroleva, D. O., & Jogezai, N. A. (2024) · Information and Learning Sciences · doi:10.1108/ils-10-2023-0137 · Cited by 27
Eisele‐Metzger, A., Lieberum, J.-L., Toews, M., Siemens, W., Heilmeyer, F., Haverkamp, C., Böhringer, D., & Meerpohl, J. J. (2025) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1017/rsm.2025.12 · Cited by 29
Nissim, Y., & Simon, E. (2025) · Journal of Education for Teaching International Research and Pedagogy · doi:10.1080/02607476.2025.2469128 · Cited by 26
The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Emergency Medicine: A Comprehensive Overview
Mijwil, M. M., Unogwu, O. J., & Kumar, K. (2023) · Mesopotamian Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare · doi:10.58496/mjaih/2023/001 · Cited by 21
Evaluating the Effectiveness and Ethical Implications of AI Detection Tools in Higher Education
Deep, P. D., Edgington, W. D., Ghosh, N., & Rahaman, M. S. (2025) · Information · doi:10.3390/info16100905 · Cited by 26
Tudino, G., & Qin, Y. (2024) · Lingua · doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2024.103838 · Cited by 32
Social Influence, Personal Views, and Behavioral Intention in ChatGPT Adoption
Bali, S., Suwandi, E., Chen, T.-C., Lin, C.-S., & Liu, M.-C. (2024) · Journal of Computer Information Systems · doi:10.1080/08874417.2024.2441758 · Cited by 21
Cognitive load scale for AI-assisted L2 writing: scale development and validation
Yao, G., & Fan, L. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1666974 · Cited by 20
Scientific Article Writing: Will ChatGPT Help?
Zashikhina, I. M. (2023) · Высшее образование в России · doi:10.31992/0869-3617-2023-32-8-9-24-47 · Cited by 26
Tracking ChatGPT Research: Insights From the Literature and the Web
Mubin, O., Alnajjar, F., Trabelsi, Z., Ali, L., Parambil, M. M. A., & Zou, Z. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3356584 · Cited by 23
Huang, L., Zhang, X., Wang, Q., Chen, Z., & Liu, Y. (2024) · Journal of the Knowledge Economy · doi:10.1007/s13132-024-01755-w · Cited by 22
Shen, Y., Tang, L., Le, H., Tan, S., Zhao, Y., Shen, K., Li, X., Juelich, T., Wang, Q., Gašević, D., et al. (2025) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13562 · Cited by 27
Tang, G., & Eaton, S. E. (2024) · Journal of Scholarly Publishing · doi:10.3138/jsp-2023-0079 · Cited by 19
Eldakar, M. A. M., Shehata, A. M. K., & Ammar, A. S. A. (2025) · Information Development · doi:10.1177/02666669251314859 · Cited by 33
Continuous use of AI technology: the roles of trust and satisfaction
Lam, T. K. (2025) · Aslib Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1108/ajim-07-2024-0548 · Cited by 22
Stylometry recognizes human and LLM-generated texts in short samples
Przystalski, K., Argasiński, J. K., Grabska-Gradzińska, I., & Ochab, J. K. (2025) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2025.129001 · Cited by 36
ChatGPT en Educación Superior: explorando sus potencialidades y sus limitaciones
Galli, M. G., & Kanobel, M. C. (2023) · Revista Educación Superior y Sociedad (ESS) · doi:10.54674/ess.v35i2.815 · Cited by 37
Easy-read and large language models: on the ethical dimensions of LLM-based text simplification
Freyer, N., Kempt, H., & Klöser, L. (2024) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-024-09792-4 · Cited by 27
Masson‐Delmotte, V. (2024) · PLOS Climate · doi:10.1371/journal.pclm.0000451 · Cited by 19
Digital knowledge engineering for strategy development
Vomberg, A., de Haan, E., Fabian, N. E., & Broekhuizen, T. (2024) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114632 · Cited by 24
AI Applications – Computer Vision and Natural Language Processing
Balakrishnan, C., Balasubaramanian, S., Jeyabalu, M., & Warrier, G. S. (2024) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781394219230.ch2 · Cited by 24
Khizar, H. M. U., Ashraf, A., Yuan, J., & Al‐Waqfi, M. A. (2025) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124047 · Cited by 18
Anakok, I., Katz, A., Chew, K.-J., & Matusovich, H. (2025) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/16094069251338898 · Cited by 19
Trends and Patterns of Artificial Intelligence Research in Libraries: A Bibliometric Analysis
Islam, M. N., & Hu, G. (2025) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440251327528 · Cited by 26
Zhao, Y., Tang, S., Zhang, H., & Lyu, L. (2025) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104400 · Cited by 28
AI Tools in Academia: Evaluating NotebookLM as a Tool for Conducting Literature Reviews
Shor, R., Greene, E. A., Sumberg, L. L., & Weingrad, A. B. (2025) · Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/00332747.2025.2541531 · Cited by 18
Vicent, M., Katushabe, C., Gloria, M., & Rugasira, J. (2025) · Discover Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s44163-025-00495-3 · Cited by 35
Samii, E., Hurni, Y., & Huber, D. E. (2023) · European Journal of Breast Health · doi:10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2023.2023-3-2 · Cited by 22
Ethics of Artificial Intelligence in University Education
Zeer, M., Siaj, R. W., Ghannam, J. A., & Kanan, M. A. (2023) · International Engineering Conference on Electrical, Energy, and Artificial Intelligence (EICEEAI) · doi:10.1109/eiceeai60672.2023.10590285 · Cited by 22
Baucon, A., & de Carvalho, C. N. (2024) · Geoheritage · doi:10.1007/s12371-024-01011-2 · Cited by 23
Kendall, G. (2024) · Journal of Academic Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10805-024-09581-0 · Cited by 20
Rojas, Ó. A. C., Contero, M., & Hincapié, M. (2025) · Multimodal Technologies and Interaction · doi:10.3390/mti9050045 · Cited by 31
How Artificial Intelligence Differs From Humans in Peer Review
Joachim, M. V., Dodson, T. B., & Laviv, A. (2025) · Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.joms.2025.03.015 · Cited by 17
The Paradox of Ethical AI-Assisted Research
Mezzadri, D. (2025) · Journal of Academic Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10805-025-09671-7 · Cited by 30
Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) in education: from organizing visions to official guidelines
Nguyen, A., Kishore, S., Hong, Y., Qutab, S., & Dang, B. (2025) · Information Technology and People · doi:10.1108/itp-08-2024-1026 · Cited by 27
ChatGPT: Where Is a Silver Lining? Exploring the realm of GPT and large language models
Тихонова, Е. В., & Raitskaya, L. (2023) · Journal of language and Education · doi:10.17323/jle.2023.18119 · Cited by 22
Torres, J. M. (2024) · Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship · doi:10.1080/08963568.2024.2321729 · Cited by 24
Enhancing Classroom Learning: ChatGPT's Integration and Educational Challenges
AlAli, R. M., & Wardat, Y. (2024) · International Journal of Religion · doi:10.61707/znwnxd43 · Cited by 25
Ruksakulpiwat, S., Phianhasin, L., Benjasirisan, C., Ding, K., Ajibade, A., Kumar, A., & Stewart, C. (2024) · JMIR mHealth and uHealth · doi:10.2196/51526 · Cited by 17
Mapping the individual, social and biospheric impacts of Foundation Models
Hernández, A. D., Krishna, S., Perini, A., Katell, M. A., Bennett, S., Borda, A., Hashem, Y., Hadjiloizou, S., Mahomed, S., Jayadeva, S., et al. (2024) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3630106.3658939 · Cited by 38
Huang, L., & Deng, J. (2024) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2024.103578 · Cited by 16
Verma, S. R., Kashive, N., & Gupta, A. K. (2025) · Benchmarking An International Journal · doi:10.1108/bij-07-2024-0564 · Cited by 21
Addressing the Novel Implications of Generative AI for Academic Publishing, Education, and Research
Roberts, L. W. (2024) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000005667 · Cited by 17
Tajik, A. (2025) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-5788599/v1 · Cited by 26
Milakis, E. D., Argyrakou, C. C., Melidis, A., & Vrettaros, J. (2025) · International Journal of Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.46300/9109.2025.19.11 · Cited by 28
Hourcade, J. P., Schmuecker, S., Norris, D., & Currin, F. H. (2024) · ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC) · doi:10.1145/3628516.3655811 · Cited by 20
Abernethy, N. J. (2024) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-024-00575-7 · Cited by 17
Accuracy of large language models in answering ophthalmology board-style questions: A meta-analysis
Wu, J.-H., Nishida, T., & Liu, T. Y. A. (2024) · Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.apjo.2024.100106 · Cited by 16
Navigating the AI era: university communication strategies and perspectives on generative AI tools
Henke, J. (2024) · Journal of Science Communication · doi:10.22323/2.23030205 · Cited by 16
Ng, J. Y. (2025) · Integrative Medicine Research · doi:10.1016/j.imr.2025.101222 · Cited by 19
Arroyo-Machado, W., Ma, J., Chen, T., Johnson, T. P., Islam, S., Michalegko, L., & Welch, E. (2025) · PLOS One · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0330416 · Cited by 15
Hacking by the prompt: Innovative ways to utilize ChatGPT for evaluators
Ferretti, S. (2023) · New Directions for Evaluation · doi:10.1002/ev.20557 · Cited by 20
Lingard, L., Chandratilake, M. N., Heer, M., Klasen, J. M., Maulina, F., Olmos‐Vega, F. M., & St‐Onge, C. (2023) · Perspectives on Medical Education · doi:10.5334/pme.1246 · Cited by 15
The Influence of ChatGPT on Student Learning and Academic Performance
Ayman, S. E., El-Seoud, S. A., Nagaty, K., & Karam, O. H. (2023) · International Conference on Computer and Applications (ICCA) · doi:10.1109/icca59364.2023.10401713 · Cited by 23
Enhancing Computer Programming Education using ChatGPT- A Mini Review
Deriba, F. G., Sanusi, I. T., & Sunday, A. O. (2023) · Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research · doi:10.1145/3631802.3631848 · Cited by 15
Bukar, U. A., Sayeed, M. S., Razak, A., Yogarayan, S., & Sneesl, R. (2024) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci14090959 · Cited by 24
Eacersall, D. C. F., Pretorius, L., Smirnov, I., Spray, E., Illingworth, S., Chugh, R., Strydom, S. C., Stratton-Maher, D., Simmons, J. S., Jennings, I., et al. (2025) · Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching · doi:10.37074/jalt.2025.8.2.9 · Cited by 36
Generative AI can effectively manipulate data
Kim, J. J. H., Srivatsa, A. V., Nahass, G. R., Rusanov, T., Hwang, S., Kim, S., Solomon, I., Lee, T. H., Kadkol, S., Ajilore, O., et al. (2025) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-024-00546-y · Cited by 15
Students Collaboratively Prompting ChatGPT
Perifanou, M. A., & Economides, A. A. (2025) · Computers · doi:10.3390/computers14050156 · Cited by 17
Jo, H., & Park, D.-H. (2025) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124326 · Cited by 26
Hui, L., & Wu, X. (2025) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-025-00827-0 · Cited by 19
Toward non-human-centered design: designing an academic article with ChatGPT
LİVBERBER, T. (2023) · El Profesional de la Informacion · doi:10.3145/epi.2023.sep.12 · Cited by 18
Environment and sustainability development: A ChatGPT perspective
Bhaskar, P., & Seth, N. (2024) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781003471059-8 · Cited by 14
Gawlik-Kobylińska, M. (2024) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci14101132 · Cited by 14
Graduate Education in China Meets AI: Key Factors for Adopting AI-Generated Content Tools
Tang, Y., & Su, L. (2024) · Libri · doi:10.1515/libri-2024-0079 · Cited by 19
Yin, S., & Chapelle, C. A. (2025) · Research Methods in Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1016/j.rmal.2025.100227 · Cited by 15
Kaebnick, G. E., Magnus, D. C., Kao, A. C., Hosseini, M., Resnik, D. B., Dubljević, V., Rentmeester, C. A., Gordijn, B., & Cherry, M. J. (2023) · Ethics & Human Research · doi:10.1002/eahr.500182 · Cited by 14
Kaebnick, G. E., Magnus, D. C., Kao, A. C., Hosseini, M., Resnik, D. B., Dubljević, V., Rentmeester, C. A., Gordijn, B., & Cherry, M. J. (2023) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2023.2292437 · Cited by 14
Plagiarism, Academic Ethics, and the Utilization of Generative AI in Academic Writing
Koplin, J., & Philosophy Documentation Center (2023) · International Journal of Applied Philosophy · doi:10.5840/ijap2023372202 · Cited by 16
Perspectives of Artificial Intelligence Use for In-House Ethics Checks of Journal Submissions
Alnaimat, F., AlSamhori, A. R. F., Hamdan, O., Seiil, B., & Qumar, A. B. (2025) · Journal of Korean Medical Science · doi:10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e170 · Cited by 15
Taiye, M., High, C., Velander, J., Matar, K., Okmanis, R., & Milrad, M. (2024) · Proceedings of the 39th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing · doi:10.1145/3605098.3636055 · Cited by 14
Al-Qudimat, A. R., Fares, Z. E., Elaarag, M., Osman, M., Al‐Zoubi, R. M., & Aboumarzouk, O. M. (2025) · Health Science Reports · doi:10.1002/hsr2.70200 · Cited by 17
Ayanwale, M. A., Adelana, O. P., Bamiro, N. B., Olatunbosun, S. O., Idowu, K. O., & Adewale, K. A. (2025) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.161637.1 · Cited by 15
Calderón, R., & Herrera, F. (2025) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-025-04650-0 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Lund, B. D., Wang, T., Mannuru, N. R., Nie, B., Shimray, S., & Wang, Z.
- Affiliations
- University of North Texas (US)
- Emporia State University (US)
- Zhejiang Tongji Vocational College of Science and Technology (CN)
- Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University (IN)
- Baker University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lund, Brady D.
- Venue
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2023-03-10
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 570-581
- ISSN
- 2330-1635 (ISSN-L)
- 2330-1643
- OpenAlex
- W4323848232
- Cited by
- 919
- References
- 97
- Citations by year
- 2026: 171 · 2025: 293 · 2024: 282 · 2023: 173
- FWCI
- 230.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Education › Academic integrity and plagiarism
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Publishing and Scholarly Communication
- Keywords
- ChatGPT, large language models, generative AI, academic writing, scholarly publishing, research ethics, AI-generated text, GPT-3, natural language processing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
