The DOI matches its Crossref record; 99 of the 99 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ChatGPT and a new academic reality: Artificial Intelligence‐written research papers and the ethics of the large language models in scholarly publishing
Open accessAbstract
Abstract This article discusses OpenAI's ChatGPT, a generative pre‐trained transformer, which uses natural language processing to fulfill text‐based user requests (i.e., a “chatbot”). The history and principles behind ChatGPT and similar models are discussed. This technology is then discussed in relation to its potential impact on academia and scholarly research and publishing. ChatGPT is seen as a potential model for the automated preparation of essays and other types of scholarly manuscripts. Potential ethical issues that could arise with the emergence of large language models like GPT‐3, the underlying technology behind ChatGPT, and its usage by academics and researchers, are discussed and situated within the context of broader advancements in artificial intelligence, machine learning, and natural language processing for research and scholarly publishing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Many authors have expressed concern that students are submitting papers generated by ChatGPT and other AI tools as their own original work, thereby attaining the performance goal but bypassing the learning goal.”
From The Effectiveness of Software Designed to Detect AI-Generated Writing: A Comparison of 16 AI Text Detectors (2023) · cites this paper as Lund et al., 2023
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This is due to concern centered on plagiarism because it is challenging to trace and verify the originality of AI-generated content [59, 60].”
From Generative artificial intelligence (GAI) usage guidelines for scholarly publishing: a cross-sectional study of medical journals (2025) · cites this paper as [59]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“They are discussed not only as tools for writing, summarizing, or retrieving scientific texts, but also as systems that may help evaluate research quality, generate manuscript feedback, and support peer review workflows (Kousha & Thelwall, 2025;Lund et al., 2023;Thelwall, 2025a).”
From Beyond Human-Likeness: Mapping the Scientific Critique Profiles of LLMs and Human Reviewers (2026) · cites this paper as Lund et al., 2023
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“This uncritical dependence not only hinders the development of critical thinking skills [6], [7].”
From A Meta-Synthesis of Factual Accuracy and Citation Hallucination in LLM Academic Assistants (2026) · cites this paper as [7]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Misattribution can lead to wrongful accusations or misinterpretation of an author's intent [Lund et al., 2023].”
From Authorship Attribution in the Era of LLMs: Problems, Methodologies, and Challenges (2025) · cites this paper as Lund et al., 2023
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
In the citing paper
“Finding answers to this question is urgent as LLMs are already starting to permeate the academic landscape (10–17).”
From How should the advancement of large language models affect the practice of science? (2025) · cites this paper as [14]
In the citing paper
“This forecast supports claims made by other scholars, who argue that LLMs will help automate mundane tasks and free up space for creative thinking (Lund et al. 2023;Dwivedi et al. 2023).”
From Friend or foe? Exploring the implications of large language models on the science system (2025) · cites this paper as Lund et al. 2023
In the citing paper
“This outcome resonates with the scholarly discourse which highlights how generative AI can be used to enhance texts, such as with brainstorming (Staiman 2023), crafting literature reviews (Lucey and Dowling 2023), and improving text clarity (Lund et al. 2023).”
From Friend or foe? Exploring the implications of large language models on the science system (2025) · cites this paper as Lund et al. 2023
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.04805 · Cited by 73,173
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.14165 · Cited by 23,372
RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach
Liu, Y., Ott, M., Goyal, N., Du, J., Joshi, M., Chen, D., Levy, O., Lewis, M., Zettlemoyer, L., & Stoyanov, V. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.11692 · Cited by 16,515
Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects
Jordan, M. I., & Mitchell, T. M. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa8415 · Cited by 9,955
On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big? 🦜
Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3442188.3445922 · Cited by 6,988 · cited 1×
“Although ChatGPT's massive Internet data set offers a wide range of perspectives and voices, Emily Bender, a computational linguist, has noted that size does not guarantee diversity (Bender et al., 2021).”
BackgroundThe Matthew Effect in Science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered.
Merton, R. K. (1968) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.159.3810.56 · Cited by 6,720
XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understanding
Yang, Z., Dai, Z., Yang, Y., Carbonell, J., Salakhutdinov, R., & Le, Q. V. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1906.08237 · Cited by 6,687
The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines
Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2 · Cited by 6,220
(1968) · PubMed · Cited by 4,803
Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLP
Strubell, E., Ganesh, A., & McCallum, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1355 · Cited by 3,684
Machine Learning Algorithms - A Review
Mahesh, B. (2020) · International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) · doi:10.21275/art20203995 · Cited by 2,952
Haenlein, M., & Kaplan, A. (2019) · California Management Review · doi:10.1177/0008125619864925 · Cited by 2,655
GPT-3: Its Nature, Scope, Limits, and Consequences
Floridi, L., & Chiriatti, M. (2020) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-020-09548-1 · Cited by 2,519
Why Does Unsupervised Pre-training Help Deep Learning?
Erhan, D., Bengio, Y., Courville, A. C., Manzagol, P.-A., Vincent, P., & Samy Bengio, A. (2010) · Cited by 2,180
Natural language processing: an introduction
Nadkarni, P. M., Lucila Ohno-machado, A., & Chapman, W. W. (2011) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000464 · Cited by 2,127
The forthcoming artificial intelligence (AI) revolution: Its impact on society and firms
Makridakis, S. (2017) · Futures · doi:10.1016/j.futures.2017.03.006 · Cited by 1,866 · cited 1×
“AI has already had a significant impact on various industries such as pharmaceutical, industrial, financial, medical, and managerial, and is expected to play a crucial role in helping businesses of all sizes stay competitive in the global economy (Makridakis, 2017).”
BackgroundAdvances in natural language processing
Hirschberg, J., & Manning, C. D. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa8685 · Cited by 1,712
ChatGPT is fun, but not an author
Thorp, H. H. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adg7879 · Cited by 1,437
Liu, X., Zheng, Y., Du, Z., Ding, M., Qian, Y., Yang, Z., & Tang, J. (2023) · AI Open · doi:10.1016/j.aiopen.2023.08.012 · Cited by 1,428
Chatting about ChatGPT: how may AI and GPT impact academia and libraries?
Lund, B. D., & Wang, T. (2023) · Library Hi Tech News · doi:10.1108/lhtn-01-2023-0009 · Cited by 1,355
Self-citationAn Overview of Chatbot Technology
Adamopoulou, E., & Moussiades, L. (2020) · IFIP advances in information and communication technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-49186-4_31 · Cited by 1,300
Chowdhary, K. R. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-81-322-3972-7_19 · Cited by 1,211
Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems
Lippmann, R. P., Moody, J. E., & Touretzky, D. S. (1990) · Cited by 1,204
Chatbots: History, technology, and applications
Adamopoulou, E., & Moussiades, L. (2020) · Machine Learning with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.mlwa.2020.100006 · Cited by 1,090
Liu, X., Zheng, Y., Du, Z., Ding, M., Qian, Y., Yang, Z., & Tang, J. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.10385 · Cited by 908
Introduction to artificial intelligence in medicine
Mintz, Y., & Brodie, R. (2019) · Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies · doi:10.1080/13645706.2019.1575882 · Cited by 867
Academic attribution: citation and the construction of disciplinary knowledge
Hyland, K. (1999) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/20.3.341 · Cited by 857
What ChatGPT and generative AI mean for science
Stokel-Walker, C., & Van Noorden, R. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-023-00340-6 · Cited by 828
Brandtzaeg, P. B., & Følstad, A. (2017) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-70284-1_30 · Cited by 788
AI-Mediated Communication: Definition, Research Agenda, and Ethical Considerations
Hancock, J. T., Naaman, M., & Levy, K. (2020) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1093/jcmc/zmz022 · Cited by 658
Artificial intelligence: a survey on evolution, models, applications and future trends
Lu, Y. (2019) · Journal of Management Analytics · doi:10.1080/23270012.2019.1570365 · Cited by 641
Large Scale Crowdsourcing and Characterization of Twitter Abusive Behavior
Founta, A.-M., Djouvas, C., Chatzakou, D., Ilias Leontiadis, A., Blackburn, J., Stringhini, G., Vakali, A. I., Sirivianos, M., & Kourtellis, N. (2018) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v12i1.14991 · Cited by 605
A Conversation on Artificial Intelligence, Chatbots, and Plagiarism in Higher Education
King, M. R., & chatGPT (2023) · Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering · doi:10.1007/s12195-022-00754-8 · Cited by 602
The Matthew effect in empirical data
Perc, M. (2014) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2014.0378 · Cited by 586
Brockman, G., Cheung, V., Pettersson, L., Schneider, J., Schulman, J., Tang, J., & Zaremba, W. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1606.01540 · Cited by 582
What Makes Good In-Context Examples for GPT-3?
Liu, J., Shen, D., Zhang, Y., Dolan, B., Carin, L., & Chen, W. (2022) · Proceedings of Deep Learning Inside Out (DeeLIO 2022): The 3rd Workshop on Knowledge Extraction and Integration for Deep Learning Architectures · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.deelio-1.10 · Cited by 563
Dale, R. (2020) · Natural Language Engineering · doi:10.1017/s1351324920000601 · Cited by 509
Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure
Moher, D., Naudet, F., Cristea, I. A., Miedema, F., Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Goodman, S. N. (2018) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2004089 · Cited by 462
Gender Bias in Contextualized Word Embeddings
Zhao, J., Wang, T., Yatskar, M., Cotterell, R., Ordóñez, V., & Chang, K.-W. (2019) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1064 · Cited by 367
Self-citationAmerican Association of University Professors
Russo, C. J. (2010) · Encyclopedia of Law and Higher Education · doi:10.4135/9781412969024.n8 · Cited by 355
Are We Preparing for a Good AI Society? A Bibliometric Review and Research Agenda
Wamba, S. F., Bawack, R. E., Guthrie, C. H., de Queiroz, M. M., & Carillo, K. (2020) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120482 · Cited by 340
Budzianowski, P., & Vulić, I. (2019) · Workshop on Neural Generation and Translation (WNGT) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-5602 · Cited by 339
Multimodal Neurons in Artificial Neural Networks
Goh, G., Cammarata, N., Voss, C., Carter, S., Petrov, M., Schubert, L., Radford, A., & Olah, C. (2021) · Distill · doi:10.23915/distill.00030 · Cited by 330
Publish or perish: academic life as management faculty live it
Miller, A. N., Taylor, S. G., & Bedeian, A. G. (2011) · Career Development International · doi:10.1108/13620431111167751 · Cited by 329
Ethics of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics
Müller, V. C., & Zalta, E. N. (2020) · TU/e Research Portal · Cited by 323
Is ChatGPT A Good Translator? Yes With GPT-4 As The Engine
Jiao, W., Wang, W., Huang, J.-T., Wang, X., Shi, S., & Tu, Z. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2301.08745 · Cited by 317
The Future of AI in Medicine: A Perspective from a Chatbot
King, M. R. (2023) · Annals of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10439-022-03121-w · Cited by 299
Plagiarism in the age of massive generative pre-trained transformers (GPT-3)
Dehouche, N. (2021) · Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics · doi:10.3354/esep00195 · Cited by 296
Gender and Representation Bias in GPT-3 Generated Stories
Lucy, L., & Bamman, D. (2021) · Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Narrative Understanding · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.nuse-1.5 · Cited by 287
Social Biases in NLP Models as Barriers for Persons with Disabilities
Hutchinson, B., Prabhakaran, V., Denton, E., Webster, K., Zhong, Y., & Denuyl, S. (2020) · Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.487 · Cited by 274
Peer Review and the Social Construction of Knowledge in the Management Discipline
Bedeian, A. G. (2004) · Academy of Management Learning and Education · doi:10.5465/amle.2004.13500489 · Cited by 234
Augier, M., March, J. G., & Sullivan, B. N. (2005) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1040.0108 · Cited by 204
Haque, M. U., Dharmadasa, I., Sworna, Z. T., Rajapakse, R. N., & Ahmad, H. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2212.05856 · Cited by 203
Can GPT-3 pass a writer’s turing test?
Elkins, K., & Chun, J. (2020) · Journal of Cultural Analytics · doi:10.22148/001c.17212 · Cited by 202
Cox, A. (2023) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.24635 · Cited by 200
Evaluating the Underlying Gender Bias in Contextualized Word Embeddings
Basta, C., Costa-jussà, M. R., & Casas, N. (2019) · Proceedings of the First Workshop on Gender Bias in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/w19-3805 · Cited by 189
Anderson, N., Belavy, D. L., Perle, S. M., Hendricks, S., Hespanhol, L., Verhagen, E., & Memon, A. R. (2023) · BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine · doi:10.1136/bmjsem-2023-001568 · Cited by 168
A Study of Today's A.I. through Chatbots and Rediscovery of Machine Intelligence
Khanna, A., Pandey, B., Vashishta, K., Kalia, K., Pradeepkumar, B., & Das, T. (2015) · International Journal of u- and e-Service, Science and Technology · doi:10.14257/ijunesst.2015.8.7.28 · Cited by 162
What Makes Good In-Context Examples for GPT-$3$?
Liu, J., Shen, D., Zhang, Y., Dolan, B., Carin, L., & Chen, W. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2101.06804 · Cited by 148
Copyright and Artificial Creation: Does EU Copyright Law Protect AI-Assisted Output?
Hugenholtz, P. B., & Quintais, J. P. (2021) · GRURRR. Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Rechtsprechungs-Report/GRUR-DVD/GRUR-CD/IIC/Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht/Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht. Internationaler Teil · doi:10.1007/s40319-021-01115-0 · Cited by 143
Assessing Social and Intersectional Biases in Contextualized Word RepresentationsPreprint
Tan, Y. C., & Celis, L. E. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1911.01485 · Cited by 142
Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Science Poetry
Kirmani, A. R. (2023) · ACS Energy Letters · doi:10.1021/acsenergylett.2c02758 · Cited by 124
Artificial Intelligence and the Copyright DilemmaPreprint
Hristov, K. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · Cited by 123
Modern Chatbot Systems: A Technical Review
Lokman, A. S., & Ameedeen, M. A. (2018) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-02683-7_75 · Cited by 122
Robo-writers: the rise and risks of language-generating AI
Hutson, M. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-021-00530-0 · Cited by 120
Plagiarism in the Context of Education and Evolving Detection Strategies
Gasparyan, A. Y., Nurmashev, B., Seksenbayev, B., Trukhachev, V. I., Kostyukova, E. I., & Kitas, G. D. (2017) · Journal of Korean Medical Science · doi:10.3346/jkms.2017.32.8.1220 · Cited by 114
A Review of Current Trends in the Development of Chatbot Systems
Nagarhalli, T. P., Vaze, V. M., & Rana, N. P. (2020) · International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communication Systems (ICACCS) · doi:10.1109/icaccs48705.2020.9074420 · Cited by 98
Will AI Console Me when I Lose my Pet? Understanding Perceptions of AI-Mediated Email Writing
Liu, Y., Mittal, A., Yang, D., & Bruckman, A. (2022) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3491102.3517731 · Cited by 92
Artificial intelligence changes the way we work: A close look at innovating with chatbots
Wang, X., Lin, X., & Shao, B. (2022) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.24621 · Cited by 83
A very preliminary analysis of DALL-E 2
Marcus, G., Davis, E., & Aaronson, S. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2204.13807 · Cited by 82
Liability for AI: public policy considerations
Zech, H. (2021) · ERA Forum · doi:10.1007/s12027-020-00648-0 · Cited by 65
Assisting academics to identify computer generated writing
Abd-Elaal, E.-S., Gamage, S. H. P. W., & Mills, J. E. (2022) · European Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1080/03043797.2022.2046709 · Cited by 62
Gilat, R., & Cole, B. J. (2023) · Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopy And Related · doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2023.01.014 · Cited by 55
Dale, R. (2017) · Natural Language Engineering · doi:10.1017/s1351324917000018 · Cited by 52
Santini, A. (2018) · The Journal of Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.2478/jccm-2018-0002 · Cited by 47
Copyright Infringement in AI-Generated ArtworksPreprint
Gillotte, J. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · Cited by 47
Kaltenbrunner, W., Pinfield, S., Waltman, L., Woods, H. B., & Brumberg, J. (2022) · Journal of Documentation · doi:10.1108/jd-01-2022-0022 · Cited by 44
Are Deep Neural Networks SMARTer Than Second Graders?
Cherian, A., Peng, K., Lohit, S., Smith, K. A., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2023) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.01043 · Cited by 44
Is academic research and publishing still leaving developing countries behind?
Lund, B. D. (2021) · Accountability in Research · doi:10.1080/08989621.2021.1913124 · Cited by 43
Self-citationArtificial intelligence in the work context
Jarrahi, M. H., Lutz, C., Boyd, K., Oesterlund, C., & Willis, M. (2022) · J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. · doi:10.1002/asi.24730 · Cited by 42
Rebala, G., Ravi, A., & Churiwala, S. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-15729-6_10 · Cited by 37
Comparing and combining Content‐ and Citation‐based approaches for plagiarism detection
Pertile, S. D. L., Moreira, V. P., & Rosso, P. (2016) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.23593 · Cited by 36
Thoughts on the Making and Remaking of the Management Discipline
Bedeian, A. G. (1996) · Journal of Management Inquiry · doi:10.1177/105649269654003 · Cited by 33
Schönberger, D. (2018) · Zeitschrift für geistiges Eigentum · doi:10.1628/zge-2018-0003 · Cited by 33
Ha, T. (2022) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121974 · Cited by 25
HULK: An Energy Efficiency Benchmark Platform for Responsible Natural Language Processing
Zhou, X., Chen, Z., Jin, X., & Wang, W. Y. (2021) · Proceedings of the 16th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.eacl-demos.39 · Cited by 24
HULK: An Energy Efficiency Benchmark Platform for Responsible Natural Language ProcessingPreprint
Zhou, X., Chen, Z., Jin, X., & Wang, W. Y. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2002.05829 · Cited by 20
Baeza-Yates, R. (2022) · Web Search and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3488560.3498370 · Cited by 19
Concerns About the Potential Risks of Artificial Intelligence in Manuscript Writing. Letter.
González‐Padilla, D. A. (2022) · The Journal of Urology · doi:10.1097/ju.0000000000003131 · Cited by 18
Improving the Quality of Constructive Peer Feedback
Waggoner Denton, A. (2018) · College Teaching · doi:10.1080/87567555.2017.1349075 · Cited by 14
An overview of innovations in the external peer review of journal manuscripts.
Woods, H. B., Brumberg, J., Kaltenbrunner, W., Pinfield, S., & Waltman, L. (2023) · Wellcome Open Research · doi:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17715.2 · Cited by 14
Next chapter in artificial writing
(2020) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-020-0223-0 · Cited by 13
AI zooms in on highly influential citations
Etzioni, O. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/547032a · Cited by 12
The Librarian's Career Guidebook
Shontz, P. K. (2004) · Cited by 9
Are Deep Neural Networks SMARTer than Second Graders?Preprint
Cherian, A., Peng, K., Lohit, S., et al. (2022) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2212.09993 · Cited by 8
Large Scale Crowdsourcing and Characterization of Twitter Abusive BehaviorPreprint
Founta, A.-M., Djouvas, C., Chatzakou, D., et al. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1802.00393 · Cited by 5
Anatomy of Constructive Peer Review
Horner, R. D., & Lines, L. M. (2019) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/mlr.0000000000001116 · Cited by 4
Nolan, C. W. (2004) · Digital Commons - Trinity University (Trinity University) · Cited by 1
Budzianowski, P., & Vulić, I. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.05774
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Alutto J. A., 2008, Final report of the AACSB international impact of research task force
- Beath C., 2012, Finding value in the information explosion, MIT Sloan Management Review, 53, 18
- Caplow T., 1958, The academic marketplace
- 10.1080/08989621.2023.216853 · DOI
- Lokman A. S., 2018, Proceedings of the future technologies conference, 1012
- Müller V. C., 2021, The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (summer 2021)
- Olsson A. &Engelbrektsson O.(2022).A thesis that writes itself: On the threat of AI‐generated essays within academia(Bachelor thesis).https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1669744/FULLTEXT02
- Yanisky‐Ravid S., 2017, Generating Rembrandt: Artificial intelligence, copyright, and accountability in the 3A Era: The human‐like authors are already here, Michigan State Law Review, 659
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ooi, K.-B., Tan, G. W.-H., Al-Emran, M., Al-Sharafi, M. A., Capatina, A., Chakraborty, A., Dwivedi, Y. K., Huang, T.-L., Kar, A. K., Lee, V.-H., et al. (2025) · Journal of Computer Information Systems · doi:10.1080/08874417.2023.2261010 · Cited by 746
Generative artificial intelligence
Banh, L., & Strobel, G. (2023) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-023-00680-1 · Cited by 879
Yenduri, G., Ramalingam, M., Selvi, G. C., Supriya, Y., Srivastava, G., Maddikunta, P. K. R., Raj, G. D., Jhaveri, R. H., Prabadevi, B., Wang, W., et al. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3389497 · Cited by 916
The role of ChatGPT in higher education: Benefits, challenges, and future research directions
(2023) · Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching · doi:10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.29 · Cited by 561
(2023) · doi:10.3390/app13116716 · Cited by 465
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lund, B. D., Wang, T., Mannuru, N. R., Nie, B., Shimray, S., & Wang, Z.
- Affiliations
- University of North Texas (US)
- Emporia State University (US)
- Zhejiang Tongji Vocational College of Science and Technology (CN)
- Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University (IN)
- Baker University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lund, Brady D.
- Venue
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2023-03-10
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 570-581
- ISSN
- 2330-1635 (ISSN-L)
- 2330-1643
- OpenAlex
- W4323848232
- Cited by
- 919
- References
- 97
- Citations by year
- 2026: 171 · 2025: 293 · 2024: 282 · 2023: 173
- FWCI
- 230.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Education › Academic integrity and plagiarism
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Publishing and Scholarly Communication
- Keywords
- ChatGPT, large language models, generative AI, academic writing, scholarly publishing, research ethics, AI-generated text, GPT-3, natural language processing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
