The DOI matches its Crossref record; 99 of the 99 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ChatGPT and a new academic reality: Artificial Intelligence‐written research papers and the ethics of the large language models in scholarly publishing
Open accessAbstract
Abstract This article discusses OpenAI's ChatGPT, a generative pre‐trained transformer, which uses natural language processing to fulfill text‐based user requests (i.e., a “chatbot”). The history and principles behind ChatGPT and similar models are discussed. This technology is then discussed in relation to its potential impact on academia and scholarly research and publishing. ChatGPT is seen as a potential model for the automated preparation of essays and other types of scholarly manuscripts. Potential ethical issues that could arise with the emergence of large language models like GPT‐3, the underlying technology behind ChatGPT, and its usage by academics and researchers, are discussed and situated within the context of broader advancements in artificial intelligence, machine learning, and natural language processing for research and scholarly publishing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Many authors have expressed concern that students are submitting papers generated by ChatGPT and other AI tools as their own original work, thereby attaining the performance goal but bypassing the learning goal.”
From The Effectiveness of Software Designed to Detect AI-Generated Writing: A Comparison of 16 AI Text Detectors (2023) · cites this paper as Lund et al., 2023
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This is due to concern centered on plagiarism because it is challenging to trace and verify the originality of AI-generated content [59, 60].”
From Generative artificial intelligence (GAI) usage guidelines for scholarly publishing: a cross-sectional study of medical journals (2025) · cites this paper as [59]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“They are discussed not only as tools for writing, summarizing, or retrieving scientific texts, but also as systems that may help evaluate research quality, generate manuscript feedback, and support peer review workflows (Kousha & Thelwall, 2025;Lund et al., 2023;Thelwall, 2025a).”
From Beyond Human-Likeness: Mapping the Scientific Critique Profiles of LLMs and Human Reviewers (2026) · cites this paper as Lund et al., 2023
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“This uncritical dependence not only hinders the development of critical thinking skills [6], [7].”
From A Meta-Synthesis of Factual Accuracy and Citation Hallucination in LLM Academic Assistants (2026) · cites this paper as [7]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Misattribution can lead to wrongful accusations or misinterpretation of an author's intent [Lund et al., 2023].”
From Authorship Attribution in the Era of LLMs: Problems, Methodologies, and Challenges (2025) · cites this paper as Lund et al., 2023
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
In the citing paper
“Finding answers to this question is urgent as LLMs are already starting to permeate the academic landscape (10–17).”
From How should the advancement of large language models affect the practice of science? (2025) · cites this paper as [14]
In the citing paper
“This forecast supports claims made by other scholars, who argue that LLMs will help automate mundane tasks and free up space for creative thinking (Lund et al. 2023;Dwivedi et al. 2023).”
From Friend or foe? Exploring the implications of large language models on the science system (2025) · cites this paper as Lund et al. 2023
In the citing paper
“This outcome resonates with the scholarly discourse which highlights how generative AI can be used to enhance texts, such as with brainstorming (Staiman 2023), crafting literature reviews (Lucey and Dowling 2023), and improving text clarity (Lund et al. 2023).”
From Friend or foe? Exploring the implications of large language models on the science system (2025) · cites this paper as Lund et al. 2023
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.04805 · Cited by 73,173
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.14165 · Cited by 23,372
RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach
Liu, Y., Ott, M., Goyal, N., Du, J., Joshi, M., Chen, D., Levy, O., Lewis, M., Zettlemoyer, L., & Stoyanov, V. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.11692 · Cited by 16,515
Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects
Jordan, M. I., & Mitchell, T. M. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa8415 · Cited by 9,955
On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big? 🦜
Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3442188.3445922 · Cited by 6,988 · cited 1×
“Although ChatGPT's massive Internet data set offers a wide range of perspectives and voices, Emily Bender, a computational linguist, has noted that size does not guarantee diversity (Bender et al., 2021).”
BackgroundThe Matthew Effect in Science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered.
Merton, R. K. (1968) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.159.3810.56 · Cited by 6,720
XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understanding
Yang, Z., Dai, Z., Yang, Y., Carbonell, J., Salakhutdinov, R., & Le, Q. V. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1906.08237 · Cited by 6,687
The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines
Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2 · Cited by 6,220
(1968) · PubMed · Cited by 4,803
Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLP
Strubell, E., Ganesh, A., & McCallum, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1355 · Cited by 3,684
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Alutto J. A., 2008, Final report of the AACSB international impact of research task force
- Beath C., 2012, Finding value in the information explosion, MIT Sloan Management Review, 53, 18
- Caplow T., 1958, The academic marketplace
- 10.1080/08989621.2023.216853 · DOI
- Lokman A. S., 2018, Proceedings of the future technologies conference, 1012
- Müller V. C., 2021, The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (summer 2021)
- Olsson A. &Engelbrektsson O.(2022).A thesis that writes itself: On the threat of AI‐generated essays within academia(Bachelor thesis).https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1669744/FULLTEXT02
- Yanisky‐Ravid S., 2017, Generating Rembrandt: Artificial intelligence, copyright, and accountability in the 3A Era: The human‐like authors are already here, Michigan State Law Review, 659
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 923
Lin, C.-H., Zhou, K., Li, L., & Sun, L. (2025) · Computers and Composition · doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102895 · Cited by 57
On actor-network theory and algorithms: ChatGPT and the new power relationships in the age of AI
Gutiérrez, J. L. M. (2023) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-023-00314-4 · Cited by 69
Hussain, K., Khan, M. L., & Malik, A. N. (2023) · Digital Business · doi:10.1016/j.digbus.2023.100071 · Cited by 74
Generative AI Usage and Academic PerformancePreprint
Wecks, J. O., Voshaar, J., Plate, B. J., & Zimmermann, J. (2024) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4812513 · Cited by 38
Watters, C., & Lemański, M. K. (2023) · Frontiers in Big Data · doi:10.3389/fdata.2023.1224976 · Cited by 64
Large language models for science and medicine
Telenti, A., Auli, M., Hie, B., Maher, C., Saria, S., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2024) · European Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1111/eci.14183 · Cited by 62
Zhu, S., Wang, Z., Zhuang, Y., Jiang, Y., Guo, M., Zhang, X., & Gao, Z. (2024) · Telematics and Informatics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.teler.2024.100138 · Cited by 65
Self-citationSandu, N., Gide, E., & Elkhodr, M. (2024) · Discover Education · doi:10.1007/s44217-024-00126-6 · Cited by 88
Nguyen, L., & Barrot, J. S. (2024) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2024.100899 · Cited by 71
Malik, A., Khan, M. L., Hussain, K., Qadir, J., & Tarhini, A. (2025) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2024.2409407 · Cited by 57
Hassija, V., Chakrabarti, A., Singh, A., Chamola, V., & Sikdar, B. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3339553 · Cited by 60
Rane, N. L. (2024) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning · doi:10.51483/ijaiml.4.1.2024.22-47 · Cited by 68
Hadi, M. U., Al-Tashi, Q., Qureshi, R., Shah, A., Muneer, A., Irfan, M., Zafar, A., Shaikh, M. B., Akhtar, N., Hassan, S. Z., et al. (2023) · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.23589741.v3 · Cited by 71
Rane, N. L. (2023) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/npm3d · Cited by 65
The Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Qualitative Research for Theory Development
Christou, P. (2023) · The Qualitative Report · doi:10.46743/2160-3715/2023.6536 · Cited by 60
Adoption of AI writing tools among academic researchers: A Theory of Reasoned Action approach
Al-Bukhrani, M. A., Alrefaee, Y. M. H., & Tawfik, M. (2025) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0313837 · Cited by 50
Fu, X., Wang, R., & Li, C. (2023) · Journal of the American Planning Association · doi:10.1080/01944363.2023.2271893 · Cited by 55
A Systematic Review of Generative AI and (English Medium Instruction) Higher Education
Bannister, P., Urbieta, A. S., & Peñalver, E. A. (2023) · Aula Abierta · doi:10.17811/rifie.52.4.2023.401-409 · Cited by 84
Huang, Q., Lv, C., Li, L., & Tu, S. (2025) · Systems · doi:10.3390/systems13030174 · Cited by 79
Editorial: Generative artificial intelligence as a plagiarism problem
Dien, J. (2023) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2023.108621 · Cited by 53
Ethical Aspects of ChatGPT in Software Engineering Research
Akbar, M. A., Khan, A. A., & Liang, P. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tai.2023.3318183 · Cited by 65
Asad, M. M., & Ajaz, A. (2024) · International Journal of Information and Learning Technology · doi:10.1108/ijilt-06-2024-0103 · Cited by 73
Maxwell, D., Oyarzun, B., Kim, S., & Bong, J. Y. (2025) · TechTrends · doi:10.1007/s11528-025-01109-6 · Cited by 80
Assessing second-language academic writing: AI vs. Human raters
Geçkin, V., Kızıltaş, E., & ÇINAR, Ç. (2023) · Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning · doi:10.31681/jetol.1336599 · Cited by 61
Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Clinical Trials
Cunningham, J. W., Abraham, W. T., Bhatt, A. S., Dunn, J., Felker, G. M., Jain, S. S., Lindsell, C. J., Mace, M., Martyn, T., Shah, R. U., et al. (2024) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2024.08.069 · Cited by 55
Kaebnick, G. E., Magnus, D. C., Kao, A. C., Hosseini, M., Resnik, D. B., Dubljević, V., Rentmeester, C. A., Gordijn, B., & Cherry, M. J. (2023) · The Hastings Center Report · doi:10.1002/hast.1507 · Cited by 48
Kaebnick, G. E., Magnus, D. C., Kao, A. C., Hosseini, M., Resnik, D. B., Dubljević, V., Rentmeester, C. A., Gordijn, B., & Cherry, M. J. (2023) · Medicine Health Care and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s11019-023-10176-6 · Cited by 47
Exploring the influence of ChatGPT on student academic success and career readiness
Dahri, N. A., Yahaya, N., & Al-Rahmi, W. M. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-13148-2 · Cited by 69
Harnessing customized AI to create voice of customer via GPT3.5
Shahin, M., Chen, F. F., & Hosseinzadeh, A. (2024) · Advanced Engineering Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.aei.2024.102462 · Cited by 58
Anani, G. E., Nyamekye, E., & Baffour-Koduah, D. (2025) · Discover Education · doi:10.1007/s44217-025-00434-5 · Cited by 72
ChatGPT in Colorectal Surgery: A Promising Tool or a Passing Fad?
Li, W., Zhang, Y., & Chen, F. (2023) · Annals of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10439-023-03232-y · Cited by 45
Kong, X., & Liu, C. (2024) · Journal of English for Academic Purposes · doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2024.101432 · Cited by 45
McAlister, A. R., Alhabash, S., & Yang, J. (2023) · Journal of Marketing Communications · doi:10.1080/13527266.2023.2289034 · Cited by 56
An integrative decision-making framework to guide policies on regulating ChatGPT usage
Bukar, U. A., Sayeed, M. S., Razak, A., Yogarayan, S., & Amodu, O. A. (2024) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.1845 · Cited by 53
Ali, H., & Aysan, A. F. (2024) · International Journal of Ethics and Systems · doi:10.1108/ijoes-04-2024-0112 · Cited by 56
Lund, B. D., Mannuru, N. R., & Agbaji, D. A. (2024) · Journal of Information Science · doi:10.1177/01655515241282001 · Cited by 55
Self-citationHadi, M. U., Al-Tashi, Q., Qureshi, R., Shah, A., Muneer, A., Irfan, M., Zafar, A., Shaikh, M. B., Akhtar, N., Hassan, S. Z., et al. (2023) · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.23589741.v2 · Cited by 51
Exploring the Impact of Generative AI on Peer Review: Insights from Journal Reviewers
Ebadi, S., Nejadghanbar, H., Salman, A. R., & Khosravi, H. (2025) · Journal of Academic Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10805-025-09604-4 · Cited by 44
Placebo or Assistant? Generative AI Between Externalization and Anthropomorphization
Skulmowski, A. (2024) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-024-09894-x · Cited by 59
Guler, N., Kirshner, S. N., & Vidgen, R. T. (2024) · Data and Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.dim.2024.100076 · Cited by 63
Multimodal composing with generative AI: Examining preservice teachers’ processes and perspectives
Smith, B. E., Shimizu, A. Y., Burriss, S. K., Hundley, M. K., & Pendergrass, E. (2024) · Computers & composition/Computers and composition · doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102896 · Cited by 43
Peer Review in the Age of Generative AI
Kankanhalli, A., & National University of Singapore (2024) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00865 · Cited by 47
Mohammadi, E., Thelwall, M., Cai, Y., Collier, T., Tahamtan, I., & Eftekhar, A. (2026) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2025.104350 · Cited by 47
Generative Artificial Intelligence: Fundamentals
Corchado, J. M., Sebastian López, F., V., J., Raul Garcia, S., & Chamoso, P. (2023) · ADCAIJ ADVANCES IN DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE JOURNAL · doi:10.14201/adcaij.31704 · Cited by 53
Tingelhoff, F., Brugger, M., & Leimeister, J. M. (2024) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1177/02683962241304105 · Cited by 60
Tracing the Influence of Large Language Models across the Most Impactful Scientific Works
Petroșanu, D.-M., Pîrjan, A., & Tăbușcă, A. (2023) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics12244957 · Cited by 47
Delving into educators’ perspectives on ChatGPT in management education: a qualitative exploration
Bhaskar, P., & Gupta, P. K. (2024) · Interactive Technology and Smart Education · doi:10.1108/itse-08-2023-0169 · Cited by 49
Bhattacharjee, A., Zeng, Y., Xu, S. Y., Kulzhabayeva, D., Ma, M., Kornfield, R., Ahmed, S. I., Mariakakis, A. T., Czerwinski, M. P., Kuzminykh, A., et al. (2024) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642081 · Cited by 59
Alkamel, M. A. A., & Alwagieh, N. A. S. (2024) · Social Sciences & Humanities Open · doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101095 · Cited by 41
Surviving ChatGPT in healthcare
Liu, Z., Zhang, L., Wu, Z., Yu, X., Cao, C., Dai, H., Liu, N., Liu, J., Liu, W., Li, Q., et al. (2024) · Frontiers in Radiology · doi:10.3389/fradi.2023.1224682 · Cited by 41
Authorship Attribution in the Era of LLMs: Problems, Methodologies, and Challenges
Huang, B., Chen, C., & Shu, K. (2025) · ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter · doi:10.1145/3715073.3715076 · Cited by 42
“Mis-attribution can lead to wrongful accusations or misinterpretation of an author’s intent (Lund et al., 2023).”
The Use of ChatGPT in Source-Based Writing Tasks
Tarchi, C., Zappoli, A., Casado-Ledesma, L., & Brante, E. W. (2024) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-024-00413-1 · Cited by 62
Karjus, A. (2025) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-025-04503-w · Cited by 99
Степанівна, С. О., Lytovchenko, I., Едуардівна, Л. Ю., & Lukianenko, V. (2024) · International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM) · doi:10.3991/ijim.v18i03.45025 · Cited by 66
Factors Affecting the Adoption and Use of ChatGPT in Higher Education
Alshammarı, S. H., & Alshammari, M. H. (2024) · International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education · doi:10.4018/ijicte.339557 · Cited by 60
Liu, Y., Ju, S., & Wang, J. (2024) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-024-02481-8 · Cited by 40
Gezdur, A., & Bhattacharjya, J. (2025) · International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management · doi:10.1108/ijpdlm-12-2023-0492 · Cited by 37
Computing education using generative artificial intelligence tools: A systematic literature review
Agbo, F. J., Olivia, C., Oguibe, G. F., Sanusi, I. T., & Sani, G. (2025) · Computers and Education Open · doi:10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100266 · Cited by 59
ChatGPT as an “author”: Bibliometric analysis to assess the validity of authorship
Nazarovets, S., & da Silva, J. A. T. (2024) · Accountability in Research · doi:10.1080/08989621.2024.2345713 · Cited by 46
Fu, C., Silalahi, A. D. K., Shih, I.-T., Phuong, D. T. T., Eunike, I. J., & Jargalsaikhan, S. (2024) · Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1155/2024/8114315 · Cited by 48
Young, J. D., Dawood, L., & Lewis, S. E. (2024) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00154 · Cited by 35
AI literacy of library and information science students: A study of Bangladesh, India and Pakistan
Hossain, Z., Biswas, M. S., & Khan, G. (2026) · Journal of Librarianship and Information Science · doi:10.1177/09610006241309323 · Cited by 43
Abou‐Abdallah, M., Dar, T., Mahmudzade, Y., Michaels, J., Talwar, R., & Tornari, C. (2024) · European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology · doi:10.1007/s00405-024-08598-w · Cited by 35
Using ChatGPT to navigate ambivalent and contradictory research findings on artificial intelligence
Sohail, S. S., Madsen, D. Ø., Himeur, Y., & Ashraf, M. (2023) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2023.1195797 · Cited by 42
Kim, D., Majdara, A., & Olson, W. (2024) · International Journal of Technology in Education · doi:10.46328/ijte.691 · Cited by 34
Information literacy, data literacy, privacy literacy, and ChatGPT
Lund, B. D., Agbaji, D. A., & Teel, Z. A. (2023) · Human Technology · doi:10.14254/1795-6889.2023.19-2.2 · Cited by 66
Self-citationDetecting the corruption of online questionnaires by artificial intelligence
Lebrun, B., Temtsin, S., Vonasch, A. J., & Bartneck, C. (2024) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2023.1277635 · Cited by 46
Fu, C., Silalahi, A. D. K., Huang, S.-C., Phuong, D. T. T., Eunike, I. J., & Yu, Z.-H. (2024) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2024.2365028 · Cited by 43
Human‐ and AI ‐based authorship: Principles and ethics
da Silva, J. A. T., & Tsigaris, P. (2023) · Learned Publishing · doi:10.1002/leap.1547 · Cited by 40
Raghu Raman, R. (2023) · Accountability in Research · doi:10.1080/08989621.2023.2273377 · Cited by 40
Future Shock: Generative AI and the International AI Policy and Governance Crisis
Leslie, D., & Perini, A. M. (2024) · Harvard Data Science Review · doi:10.1162/99608f92.88b4cc98 · Cited by 33
Gutiérrez, R., Uhl, J. C., Schrom-Feiertag, H., & Tscheligi, M. (2024) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/58623 · Cited by 37
Esmaeilzadeh, P., Maddah, M., & Mirzaei, T. (2025) · Computers in Human Behavior Artificial Humans · doi:10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100127 · Cited by 47
A Comparative Analysis of the Rating of College Students’ Essays by ChatGPT versus Human Raters
Jackaria, P. M., Hajan, B. H., & Mastul, A.-R. H. (2024) · International Journal of Learning Teaching and Educational Research · doi:10.26803/ijlter.23.2.23 · Cited by 38
Ahmed, Z., Shanto, S. S., & Jony, A. I. (2024) · STEM Education · doi:10.3934/steme.2024011 · Cited by 32
The sociolinguistic foundations of language modeling
Grieve, J., Bartl, S., Fuoli, M., Grafmiller, J., Huang, W., Jawerbaum, A., Murakami, A., Perlman, M., Rœmling, D., & Winter, B. (2025) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2024.1472411 · Cited by 56
ChatGPT applications in Academic Research: A Review of Benefits, Concerns, and Recommendations
AlZaabi, A., ALAmri, A., Albalushi, H., Aljabri, R., & AalAbdulsalam, A. (2023) · doi:10.1101/2023.08.17.553688 · Cited by 32
Guidance needed for using artificial intelligence to screen journal submissions for misconduct
Hosseini, M., & Resnik, D. B. (2025) · Research Ethics · doi:10.1177/17470161241254052 · Cited by 33
“For a review of research ethics issues related to using AI in scientific writing, see Hosseini et al. (2023), Lund et al. (2023), and Stahl and Eke (2024). as fabrication or falsification of data or plagiarism) requires proof by preponderance of evidence that the person acted intentionally,…”
ChatGPT and the potential growing of ghost bibliographic references
Orduña-Malea, E., & Cabezas-Clavijo, Á. (2023) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-023-04804-4 · Cited by 31
Aithal, P. S., & Aithal, S. (2023) · International Journal of Management Technology and Social Sciences · doi:10.47992/ijmts.2581.6012.0326 · Cited by 35
Ofem, U. J., ARIKPO, I. M., Ovat, S. V., Nwogwugwu, C. E., Anake, P. M., Udeh, M. I., & Diwa, O. B. (2024) · Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching · doi:10.37074/jalt.2024.7.1.9 · Cited by 41
Oubibi, M., Hryshayeva, K., & Huang, R. (2025) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2025.2454445 · Cited by 43
Lund, B. D., Agbaji, D. A., & Teel, Z. A. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4324580 · Cited by 31
Self-citationAI, ChatGPT and the university
Fesenmaier, D. R., & Wöber, K. W. (2023) · Annals of Tourism Research · doi:10.1016/j.annals.2023.103578 · Cited by 30
Wang, X., Hong, Y., & He, X. (2024) · IET Blockchain · doi:10.1049/blc2.12076 · Cited by 38
Flitcroft, M. A., Sheriff, S. A., Wolfrath, N., Maddula, R., McConnell, L., Xing, Y., Haines, K., Wong, S. L., & Kothari, A. N. (2024) · Annals of Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1245/s10434-024-15549-6 · Cited by 35
Understanding the Impact of AI-Generated Content on Social Media: The Pixiv Case
Wei, Y., & Gareth Tyson, A. (2024) · ACM International Conference on Multimedia (ACM MM) · doi:10.1145/3664647.3680631 · Cited by 50
Strzelecki, A. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-13222-9 · Cited by 46
Hamouche, S., Rofa, N., & Parent‐Lamarche, A. (2023) · European journal of training and development · doi:10.1108/ejtd-10-2023-0152 · Cited by 29
Howard, F. M., Li, A., Riffon, M., Garrett-Mayer, E. S., & Pearson, A. T. (2024) · JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics · doi:10.1200/cci.24.00077 · Cited by 30
ChatGPT, the perfect virtual teaching assistant? Ideological bias in learner-chatbot interactions
Poucke, M. V. (2024) · Computers & composition/Computers and composition · doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102871 · Cited by 46
Patel, K., Shah, M., Qureshi, K. M., & Qureshi, M. R. N. (2025) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-025-11435-z · Cited by 42
da Trindade, A. S. C. E., & de Oliveira, H. P. C. (2024) · Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação · doi:10.1590/1981-5344/47485 · Cited by 63
A hybrid framework for creating artificial intelligence-augmented systematic literature reviews
Malik, F. S., & Terzidis, O. (2026) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-025-00522-8 · Cited by 28
Verboom, A. D. P. R., Pais, L., Zijlstra, F., Oswald, F. L., & dos Santos, N. R. (2025) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-025-00546-w · Cited by 42
Prompting Frameworks for Large Language Models: A Survey
Liu, X., Wang, J., Yuan, X., Sun, J., Dong, G., Di, P., Wang, W., & Wang, D. (2026) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3789253 · Cited by 86
ChatGPT in medical libraries, possibilities and future directions: An integrative review
Lund, B. D., Khan, D., & Yuvaraj, M. (2024) · Health Information & Libraries Journal · doi:10.1111/hir.12518 · Cited by 34
Self-citationMustapha, K. B., Mustapha, K. B., Yap, E. H., & Abakr, Y. A. (2024) · Interactive Technology and Smart Education · doi:10.1108/itse-10-2023-0198 · Cited by 33
Abumalloh, R. A., Nilashi, M., Ooi, K., Tan, G. W., & Chan, H. K. (2024) · Computers in Industry · doi:10.1016/j.compind.2024.104128 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Lund, B. D., Wang, T., Mannuru, N. R., Nie, B., Shimray, S., & Wang, Z.
- Affiliations
- University of North Texas (US)
- Emporia State University (US)
- Zhejiang Tongji Vocational College of Science and Technology (CN)
- Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University (IN)
- Baker University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lund, Brady D.
- Venue
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2023-03-10
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 570-581
- ISSN
- 2330-1635 (ISSN-L)
- 2330-1643
- OpenAlex
- W4323848232
- Cited by
- 919
- References
- 97
- Citations by year
- 2026: 171 · 2025: 293 · 2024: 282 · 2023: 173
- FWCI
- 230.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Education › Academic integrity and plagiarism
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Publishing and Scholarly Communication
- Keywords
- ChatGPT, large language models, generative AI, academic writing, scholarly publishing, research ethics, AI-generated text, GPT-3, natural language processing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
