Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 163

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An anthocyanin/polyphenolic‐rich fruit juice reduces oxidative DNA damage and increases glutathione level in healthy probands

Weisel, Tamara, Baum, Matthias, Eisenbrand, Gerhard, Dietrich, Helmut, Will, Frank, Stockis, Jean‐Pierre, Kulling, Sabine, Rüfer, Corinna, Johannes, Christian, Janzowski, Christine·2006·Biotechnology Journal

Abstract

Oxidative cell damage is involved in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis, cancer, diabetes and other diseases. Uptake of fruit juice with especially high content of antioxidant flavonoids/polyphenols, might reduce oxidative cell damage. Therefore, an intervention study was performed with a red mixed berry juice [trolox equivalent antioxidative capacity (TEAC): 19.1 mmol/L trolox] and a corresponding polyphenol‐depleted juice (polyphenols largely removed, TEAC 2.4 mmol/L trolox), serving as control. After a 3‐week run‐in period, 18 male probands daily consumed 700 mL juice, and 9 consumed control juice, in a 4‐week intervention, followed by a 3‐week wash‐out. Samples were collected weekly to analyze DNA damage (comet assay), lipid peroxidation (plasma malondialdehyde: HPLC/fluorescence; urinary isoprostanes: GC‐MS), blood glutathione (photometrically), DNA‐binding activity of nuclear factor‐κB (ELISA) and plasma carotenoid/α‐tocopherol levels (HPLC‐DAD). During intervention with the fruit juice, a decrease of oxidative DNA damage (p<5×10–4) and an increase of reduced glutathione (p<5×10–4) and of glutathione status (p<0.05) were observed, which returned to the run‐in levels in the subsequent wash‐out phase. The other biomarkers were not significantly modulated by the juice supplement. Intervention with the control juice did not result in reduction of oxidative damage. In conclusion, the fruit juice clearly reduces oxidative cell damage in healthy probands.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/biot.200600004

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 163

Metadata

Authors
Weisel, T., Baum, M., Eisenbrand, G., Dietrich, H., Will, F., Stockis, J., Kulling, S., Rüfer, C., Johannes, C., & Janzowski, C.
Venue
Biotechnology Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-04
Volume
1
Issue
4
Pages
388-397
ISSN
  • 1860-6768 (ISSN-L)
  • 1860-7314
OpenAlex
W1967817279
Cited by
163
References
6
FWCI
4.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.