Cited by 1723D Printing in Biomedical ResearchMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis ApplicationsMicrofluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies

A gel-free 3D microfluidic cell culture system

Ong, Siew-Min, Zhang, Chi, Toh, Yi-Chin, Kim, So Hyun, Foo, Hsien Loong, Tan, Choon Hong, van Noort, Danny, Park, Sungsu +1 more·2008·Biomaterials

Abstract

3D microfluidic cell culture systems offer a biologically relevant model to conduct micro-scale mammalian cell-based research and applications. Various natural and synthetic hydrogels have been successfully incorporated into microfluidic systems to support mammalian cells in 3D. However, embedment of cells in hydrogels introduces operational complexity, potentially hinders mass transfer, and is not suitable for establishing cell-dense, ECM-poor constructs. We present here a gel-free method for seeding and culturing mammalian cells three-dimensionally in a microfluidic channel. A combination of transient inter-cellular polymeric linker and micro-fabricated pillar arrays was used for the in situ formation and immobilization of 3D multi-cellular aggregates in a microfluidic channel. 3D cellular constructs formed this way are relieved of hydrogel embedment for cellular support. Two mammalian cell lines (A549 and C3A) and a primary mammalian cell (bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells) were cultured in the gel-free 3D microfluidic cell culture system. The cells displayed 3D cellular morphology, cellular functions and differentiation capability, affirming the versatility of the system as a 3D cell perfusion culture platform for anchorage-dependent mammalian cells.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.04.022

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cells grown in 3D culture can be incorporated into a biosensor either by direct attachment onto a biotic or abiotic substrate surface or by indirect attachment via entrapment in a biocompatible biopolymer.

    “Cells grown in 3D culture can be incorporated into a biosensor either by direct attachment onto a biotic or abiotic substrate surface or by indirect attachment via entrapment in a biocompatible biopolymer. 83,84”
  • The wide variety of commercially available hydrogels promotes facile selection of one or more suitable matrices for each cell line and/or biosensor application and helps overcome disadvantageous features of some polymer matrices.

    “The wide variety of commercially available hydrogels promotes facile selection of one or more suitable matrices for each cell line and/or biosensor application and helps overcome the disadvantageous features of some polymer matrices, such as variable compositions and properties (animal-based hydrogels) and requisite cytotoxic pretreatment steps (some synthetic hydrogels). 84”
  • These 3D cell aggregates preserved cell viability and 3D morphology but exhibited greater cell function compared to a similar 2D monolayer.

    “These 3D cell aggregates not only preserved cell viability and 3D morphology but also exhibited greater cell function when compared to similar 2D monolayer. 84”
  • Ong et al. produced a gel-free 3D system using two carcinoma cell lines and a primary bone marrow mesenchymal stem line.

    “Ong et al . produced the gel-free 3D system using two carcinoma cell lines and a primary bone marrow mesenchymal stem line.”
  • An alternative to the hydrogel matrix for cell lines that reach confluence quickly or naturally have little to no extracellular matrix is a gel-free system that uses an intercellular polymeric linker to create 3D cellular aggregates supported by neighboring cells.

    “An alternative to the hydrogel matrix for cell lines that reach confluence quickly or that naturally have little to no extracellular matrix is a gel-free system that uses an intercellular polymeric linker to create 3D cellular aggregates supported by neighboring cells. 84”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ong, S.-M., Zhang, C., Toh, Y.-C., Kim, S. H., Foo, H. L., Tan, C. H., van Noort, D., Park, S., & Yu, H.
Affiliations
  • Agency for Science, Technology and Research (SG)
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • Ewha Womans University (KR)
Venue
Biomaterials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-08
Volume
29
Issue
22
Pages
3237-3244
ISSN
0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2124775838
Cited by
172
References
38
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 15
FWCI
9.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biomaterials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National University of Singapore
  • Ewha Womans University
  • National Medical Research Council
  • Biomedical Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies
Keywords
3D cell culture, microfluidic cell culture, cell aggregation, pillar arrays, cell immobilization, A549 cells, C3A cells, bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells, adherent cells, cell differentiation
MeSH terms
Actins, Animals, Bone Marrow Cells, Cell Aggregation, Cell Line, Cell Survival, Cells, Cultured, Humans, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Models, Biological, Cell Culture Techniques, Hydrogel, Polyethylene Glycol Dimethacrylate, Microfluidics, Rats, Mesenchymal Stem Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review