The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Production of biocommodities and bioelectricity by cell‐free synthetic enzymatic pathway biotransformations: Challenges and opportunities
Open accessAbstract
Cell‐free synthetic (enzymatic) pathway biotransformation (SyPaB) is the assembly of a number of purified enzymes (usually more than 10) and coenzymes for the production of desired products through complicated biochemical reaction networks that a single enzyme cannot do. Cell‐free SyPaB, as compared to microbial fermentation, has several distinctive advantages, such as high product yield, great engineering flexibility, high product titer, and fast reaction rate. Biocommodities (e.g., ethanol, hydrogen, and butanol) are low‐value products where costs of feedstock carbohydrates often account for ∼30–70% of the prices of the products. Therefore, yield of biocommodities is the most important cost factor, and the lowest yields of profitable biofuels are estimated to be ca. 70% of the theoretical yields of sugar‐to‐biofuels based on sugar prices of ca. US$ 0.18 per kg. The opinion that SyPaB is too costly for producing low‐value biocommodities are mainly attributed to the lack of stable standardized building blocks (e.g., enzymes or their complexes), costly labile coenzymes, and replenishment of enzymes and coenzymes. In this perspective, I propose design principles for SyPaB, present several SyPaB examples for generating hydrogen, alcohols, and electricity, and analyze the advantages and limitations of SyPaB. The economical analyses clearly suggest that developments in stable enzymes or their complexes as standardized parts, efficient coenzyme recycling, and use of low‐cost and more stable biomimetic coenzyme analogs, would result in much lower production costs than do microbial fermentations because the stabilized enzymes have more than 3 orders of magnitude higher weight‐based total turn‐over numbers than microbial biocatalysts, although extra costs for enzyme purification and stabilization are spent. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2010. 105: 663–677. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Non-fermentative pathways for synthesis of branched-chain higher alcohols as biofuels
Atsumi, S., Hanai, T., & Liao, J. C. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06450 · Cited by 1,945
Foundations for engineering biology
Endy, D. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04342 · Cited by 1,511
How biotech can transform biofuels
Lynd, L. R., Laser, M. S., Bransby, D., Dale, B. E., Davison, B., Hamilton, R., Himmel, M., Keller, M., McMillan, J. D., Sheehan, J., et al. (2008) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt0208-169 · Cited by 1,121
A General Method for Site-specific Incorporation of Unnatural Amino Acids into Proteins
Noren, C. J., Anthony-Cahill, S. J., Griffith, M. C., & Schultz, P. G. (1989) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2649980 · Cited by 1,019
Benner, S. A., & Sismour, A. M. (2005) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1637 · Cited by 834
Microdiesel: Escherichia coli engineered for fuel production
Kalscheuer, R., Stölting, T., & Steinbüchel, A. (2006) · Microbiology · doi:10.1099/mic.0.29028-0 · Cited by 490
Extremely thermophilic microorganisms for biomass conversion: status and prospects
Blumer-Schuette, S. E., Kataeva, I., Westpheling, J., Adams, M. W., & Kelly, R. M. (2008) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2008.04.007 · Cited by 269
Cited by
Transformation of Biomass into Commodity Chemicals Using Enzymes or Cells
Straathof, A. J. J. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr400309c · Cited by 459
Cell-free synthetic biology: Thinking outside the cell
Hodgman, C. E., & Jewett, M. C. (2012) · Metabolic Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2011.09.002 · Cited by 425
Multienzyme Cascade Reactions—Status and Recent Advances
Sperl, J. M., & Sieber, V. (2018) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.7b03440 · Cited by 363
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, Y. ‐. P.
- Venue
- Biotechnology and Bioengineering
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-01-19
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 663-677
- ISSN
- 0006-3592 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0290
- OpenAlex
- W2119995392
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 5.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.