Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 413

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Growth, lipid content, productivity, and fatty acid composition of tropical microalgae for scale‐up production

Huerlimann, Roger, de Nys, Rocky, Heimann, Kirsten·2010·Biotechnology and Bioengineering

Abstract

Biomass and lipid productivity, lipid content, and quantitative and qualitative lipid composition are critical parameters in selecting microalgal species for commercial scale‐up production. This study compares lipid content and composition, and lipid and biomass productivity during logarithmic, late logarithmic, and stationary phase of Nannochloropsis sp., Isochrysis sp., Tetraselmis sp., and Rhodomonas sp. grown in L1‐, f/2‐, and K‐medium. Of the tested species, Tetraselmis sp. exhibited a lipid productivity of 3.9–4.8 g m−2 day−1 in any media type, with comparable lipid productivity by Nannochloropsis sp. and Isochrysis sp. when grown in L1‐medium. The dry biomass productivity of Tetraselmis sp. (33.1–45.0 g m−2 day−1) exceeded that of the other species by a factor 2–10. Of the organisms studied, Tetraselmis sp. had the best dry biomass and/or lipid production profile in large‐scale cultures. The present study provides a practical benchmark, which allows comparison of microalgal production systems with different footprints, as well as terrestrial systems. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2010;107: 245–257. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/bit.22809

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 413

Metadata

Authors
Huerlimann, R., de Nys, R., & Heimann, K.
Venue
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-08-02
Volume
107
Issue
2
Pages
245-257
ISSN
  • 0006-3592 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0290
OpenAlex
W2129368918
Cited by
413
References
10
FWCI
9.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.