The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Scaffold‐free inkjet printing of three‐dimensional zigzag cellular tubes
Abstract
The capability to print three‐dimensional (3D) cellular tubes is not only a logical first step towards successful organ printing but also a critical indicator of the feasibility of the envisioned organ printing technology. A platform‐assisted 3D inkjet bioprinting system has been proposed to fabricate 3D complex constructs such as zigzag tubes. Fibroblast (3T3 cell)‐based tubes with an overhang structure have been successfully fabricated using the proposed bioprinting system. The post‐printing 3T3 cell viability of printed cellular tubes has been found above 82% (or 93% with the control effect considered) even after a 72‐h incubation period using the identified printing conditions for good droplet formation, indicating the promising application of the proposed bioprinting system. Particularly, it is proved that the tubular overhang structure can be scaffold‐free fabricated using inkjetting, and the maximum achievable height depends on the inclination angle of the overhang structure. As a proof‐of‐concept study, the resulting fabrication knowledge helps print tissue‐engineered blood vessels with complex geometry. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2012; 109: 3152–3160. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
3D bioprinting for engineering complex tissues
Mandrycky, C., Wang, Z., Kim, K., & Kim, D.-H. (2016) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.12.011 · Cited by 1,754
Markstedt, K., Mantas, A., Tournier, I., Martínez Ávila, H., Hägg, D., & Gatenholm, P. (2015) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/acs.biomac.5b00188 · Cited by 1,528
Bioinks for 3D bioprinting: an overview
Gungor-Ozkerim, P. S., Inci, I., Zhang, Y. S., Khademhosseini, A., & Dokmeci, M. R. (2018) · Biomaterials Science · doi:10.1039/c7bm00765e · Cited by 1,428
Progress in 3D bioprinting technology for tissue/organ regenerative engineering
Matai, I., Kaur, G., Seyedsalehi, A., McClinton, A., & Laurencin, C. T. (2020) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119536 · Cited by 1,156
The bioink: A comprehensive review on bioprintable materials
Hospodiuk, M., Dey, M., Sosnoski, D., & Ozbolat, I. T. (2017) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.12.006 · Cited by 1,118
Inkjet Bioprinting of Biomaterials
Li, X., Liu, B., Pei, B., Chen, J., Zhou, D., Peng, J., Zhang, X., Jia, W., & Xu, T. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00008 · Cited by 686
Bioprinting Toward Organ Fabrication: Challenges and Future Trends
Ozbolat, I. T., & Yu, Y. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2013.2243912 · Cited by 666
Coaxial nozzle-assisted 3D bioprinting with built-in microchannels for nutrients delivery
Gao, Q., He, Y., Fu, J.-Z., Liu, A., & Ma, L. (2015) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.05.031 · Cited by 630
Unagolla, J. M., & Jayasuriya, A. C. (2020) · Applied Materials Today · doi:10.1016/j.apmt.2019.100479 · Cited by 544
Bioprinting for vascular and vascularized tissue biofabrication
Datta, P., Ayan, B., & Ozbolat, I. T. (2017) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2017.01.035 · Cited by 431
Bioprinting Technology: A Current State-of-the-Art Review
Dababneh, A. B., & Ozbolat, I. T. (2014) · Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering · doi:10.1115/1.4028512 · Cited by 427
Freeform inkjet printing of cellular structures with bifurcations
Christensen, K., Xu, C., Chai, W., Zhang, Z., Fu, J., & Huang, Y. (2015) · Biotechnology and Bioengineering · doi:10.1002/bit.25501 · Cited by 351
Self-citation3D bioprinting for drug discovery and development in pharmaceutics
Peng, W., Datta, P., Ayan, B., Ozbolat, V., Sosnoski, D., & Ozbolat, I. T. (2017) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2017.05.025 · Cited by 313
An, B. W., Kim, K., Lee, H., Kim, S., Shim, Y., Lee, D., Song, J. Y., & Park, J. (2015) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201502092 · Cited by 306
Engineering Organoid Vascularization
Grebenyuk, S., & Ranga, A. (2019) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2019.00039 · Cited by 295
Print Me An Organ! Why We Are Not There Yet
Ng, W. L., Chua, C. K., & Shen, Y.-F. (2019) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.101145 · Cited by 287
3D Bioprinting of Vessel-like Structures with Multilevel Fluidic Channels
Gao, Q., Liu, Z., Lin, Z., Qiu, J., Liu, Y., Liu, A., Wang, Y., Xiang, M., Chen, B., Fu, J., et al. (2017) · ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering · doi:10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00643 · Cited by 267
3D printing to innovate biopolymer materials for demanding applications: A review
Li, N., Qiao, D., Zhao, S., Lin, Q., Zhang, B., & Xie, F. (2021) · Materials Today Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.mtchem.2021.100459 · Cited by 142
Bioprinting technologies for disease modeling
Memic, A., Navaei, A., Mirani, B., Cordova, J. A. V., Aldhahri, M., Dolatshahi-Pirouz, A., Akbari, M., & Nikkhah, M. (2017) · Biotechnology Letters · doi:10.1007/s10529-017-2360-z · Cited by 73
Metadata
- Authors
- Xu, C., Chai, W., Huang, Y., & Markwald, R. R.
- Venue
- Biotechnology and Bioengineering
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-07-19
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3152-3160
- ISSN
- 0006-3592 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0290
- OpenAlex
- W2097154761
- Cited by
- 357
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
