The DOI matches its Crossref record; 200 of the 200 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Inkjet Bioprinting of Biomaterials
Abstract
The inkjet technique has the capability of generating droplets in the picoliter volume range, firing thousands of times in a few seconds and printing in the noncontact manner. Since its emergence, inkjet technology has been widely utilized in the publishing industry for printing of text and pictures. As the technology developed, its applications have been expanded from two-dimensional (2D) to three-dimensional (3D) and even used to fabricate components of electronic devices. At the end of the twentieth century, researchers were aware of the potential value of this technology in life sciences and tissue engineering because its picoliter-level printing unit is suitable for depositing biological components. Currently inkjet technology has been becoming a practical tool in modern medicine serving for drug development, scaffold building, and cell depositing. In this article, we first review the history, principles and different methods of developing this technology. Next, we focus on the recent achievements of inkjet printing in the biological field. Inkjet bioprinting of generic biomaterials, biomacromolecules, DNAs, and cells and their major applications are introduced in order of increasing complexity. The current limitations/challenges and corresponding solutions of this technology are also discussed. A new concept, biopixels, is put forward with a combination of the key characteristics of inkjet printing and basic biological units to bring a comprehensive view on inkjet-based bioprinting. Finally, a roadmap of the entire 3D bioprinting is depicted at the end of this review article, clearly demonstrating the past, present, and future of 3D bioprinting and our current progress in this field.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
3D bioprinting of tissues and organs
Murphy, S. V., & Atala, A. (2014) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2958 · Cited by 7,034
Biological properties of extracellular vesicles and their physiological functions
Yáñez‐Mó, M., Siljander, P. R. ‐., Andreu, Z., Bedina Zavec, A., Borràs, F. E., Buzas, E. I., Buzas, K., Casal, E., Cappello, F., Carvalho, J., et al. (2015) · Journal of Extracellular Vesicles · doi:10.3402/jev.v4.27066 · Cited by 5,926
Polymers for 3D Printing and Customized Additive Manufacturing
Ligon, S. C., Liska, R., Stampfl, J., Gurr, M., & Mülhaupt, R. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00074 · Cited by 3,741
3D printing of polymer matrix composites: A review and prospective
Wang, X., Jiang, M., Zhou, Z., Gou, J., & Hui, D. (2017) · Composites Part B: Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.034 · Cited by 3,325
Gibson, I., Rosen, D., & Stucker, B. (2015) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-2113-3 · Cited by 3,299
Rayleigh, L. (1878) · Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society · doi:10.1112/plms/s1-10.1.4 · Cited by 3,064
DROP IMPACT DYNAMICS: Splashing, Spreading, Receding, Bouncing…
Yarin, A. L. (2006) · Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1146/annurev.fluid.38.050304.092144 · Cited by 2,677
Inkjet Printing—Process and Its Applications
Singh, M., Haverinen, H. M., Dhagat, P., & Jabbour, G. E. (2010) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.200901141 · Cited by 2,375
Derby, B. (2010) · Annual Review of Materials Research · doi:10.1146/annurev-matsci-070909-104502 · Cited by 1,984
Inkjet Printing of Polymers: State of the Art and Future Developments
de Gans, B. ‐., Duineveld, P. C., & Schubert, U. S. (2004) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.200300385 · Cited by 1,906
Cited by
Arif, Z. U., Khalid, M. Y., Noroozi, R., Sadeghianmaryan, A., Jalalvand, M., & Hossain, M. (2022) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.07.140 · Cited by 395
Unraveling of Advances in 3D-Printed Polymer-Based Bone Scaffolds
Xu, Y., Zhang, F., Zhai, W., Cheng, S., Li, J., & Wang, Y. (2022) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym14030566 · Cited by 349
Recent Advances in 3D Printing of Smart Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering and Regeneration
Yuan, X., Zhu, W., Yang, Z., He, N., Chen, F., Han, X., & Zhou, K. (2024) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202403641 · Cited by 339
In Situ 3D Bioprinting Living Photosynthetic Scaffolds for Autotrophic Wound Healing
Wang, X., Yang, C., Yu, Y., & Zhao, Y. (2022) · Research · doi:10.34133/2022/9794745 · Cited by 143
Scaling DNA data storage with nanoscale electrode wells
Nguyen, B. H., Takahashi, C. N., Gupta, G., Smith, J. A., Rouse, R., Berndt, P., Yekhanin, S., Ward, D. P., Ang, S. D., Garvan, P., et al. (2021) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abi6714 · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, X., Liu, B., Pei, B., Chen, J., Zhou, D., Peng, J., Zhang, X., Jia, W., & Xu, T.
- Venue
- Chemical Reviews
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2020-09-09
- Volume
- 120
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 10793-10833
- ISSN
- 0009-2665 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6890
- OpenAlex
- W3084300836
- Cited by
- 686
- References
- 200
- FWCI
- 8.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inkjet Bioprinting of Biomaterials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00008
- The paper
- Li, X., Liu, B., Pei, B., Chen, J., Zhou, D., Peng, J., Zhang, X., Jia, W., & Xu, T. (2020). Inkjet Bioprinting of Biomaterials. Chemical Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.