The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the contribution of eco‐innovation features to a circular economy: A microlevel quantitative approach
Abstract
The circular economy (CE) and eco‐innovation (EI) are two concepts deemed instrumental in achieving a sustainable transition. They have been proposed in the academic literature and by practitioners and have acquired very high public policy relevance, being endorsed by policymakers and ultimately leading to regulations supporting them. It has been argued that both concepts are compatible and interrelated and that EI is instrumental in achieving the CE. However, little is known about how different EI features contribute to the CE at the microlevel. This article tries to cover this gap. Its aim is to assess and quantify the causal relationship between different EI features and the CE with the help of a unique dataset of small‐ and medium‐sized firms in Spain and an econometric analysis. Our results show that only systemic EIs contribute to a global CE, whereas other EI types such as component additions or small changes in existing production processes could even be barriers to high levels of circularity. It is found out that technological novelty is not relevant for reaching the CE. The results support the understanding of how EIs enable a transition to the CE. Care should be taken not to promote incremental EIs that do not only achieve low (or no) circularity but that effectively lock‐in the economic system in solutions that entail a barrier to the achievement of high‐level circularity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, the proposed product innovation (and other types of market-related innovation) may not be radical enough to enable a fully-fledged CE (Kiefer et al., 2021).”
From Stakeholder governance to facilitate collaboration for a systemic circular economy transition: A qualitative study in the European chemicals and plastics industry (2024) · cites this paper as Kiefer et al., 2021
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions
Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005 · Cited by 8,550
Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007 · Cited by 6,536
Rizos, V., Behrens, A., Van der Gaast, W., Hofman, E., Ioannou, A., Kafyeke, T., Flamos, A., Rinaldi, R., Papadelis, S., Hirschnitz-Garbers, M., et al. (2016) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su8111212 · Cited by 1,265
The Circular Economy: A New Development Strategy in China
Yuan, Z., Bi, J., & Moriguichi, Y. (2006) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1162/108819806775545321 · Cited by 1,175
Drivers and barriers of eco‐innovation types for sustainable transitions: A quantitative perspective
Kiefer, C. P., Del Río González, P., & Carrillo‐Hermosilla, J. (2019) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2246 · Cited by 379
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 83
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119648 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.03.019 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jengtecman.2013.10.004 · DOI
- 10.1111/jiec.12606 · DOI
- 10.4337/9781788112574 · DOI
- Brundtland G. H., 1987, Report of the World Commission on environment and development: "Our common future.", 300
- 10.1016/j.respol.2019.103827 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.09.001 · DOI
- Carrillo‐Hermosilla J., 2009, Eco‐innovation: When sustainability and competitiveness shake hands, 256, 10.1057/9780230244856 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.02.014 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/icc/dtr051 · DOI
- Constantinos C., 2010, SMEs and the environment in the European Union
- 10.1111/jiec.12599 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.111 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.049 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.08.001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/bse.426 · DOI
- 10.3846/20294913.2015.1070301 · DOI
- Río P., 2011, Climate change policies: Global challenges and future prospects, 49
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.009 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.rser.2005.12.003 · DOI
- 10.1002/bse.2336 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.03.009 · DOI
- Dijksma S., 2016, A circular economy in the Netherlands by 2050
- 10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00176-6 · DOI
- Field A., 2013, Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.056 · DOI
- Fussler C., 1996, A breakthrough discipline for innovation and sustainability
- 10.3390/ijerph16050851 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.215 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.03.026 · DOI
- 10.1002/bse.450 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.016 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118160 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.044 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.eist.2015.09.005 · DOI
- 10.1111/jiec.12977 · DOI
- Johnstone N., 2007, Eco‐innovation, policy and globalisation, OECD Observer, 264, 15
- 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.10.034 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/bse.2259 · DOI
- 10.1016/0016-3287(94)90071-X · DOI
- Kemp R., 2007, Final report MEI project about measuring eco‐innovation
- 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.02.021 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.241 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.04.028 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.eist.2018.12.002 · DOI
- 10.1002/bse.487 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.041 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.111 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118531 · DOI
- Lacy P., 2015, Waste to wealth: Creating advantage in a circular economy, Accenture Strategy, 293, 1
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.042 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.04.002 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00332.x · DOI
- 10.1080/09640568.2018.1486290 · DOI
- Mazzanti M. Antonioli D. Ghisetti C. &Nicolli F.(2016).Firm surveys relating environmental policies environmental performance and innovation.OECD Environment Working Papers 103.https://doi.org/10.1787/5jm0v405l97l-en · DOI
- 10.1111/jiec.12597 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119737 · DOI
- Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2009).Eco‐innovation in industry. Enabling green growth.276.https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264077225-en · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.031 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.10.019 · DOI
- 10.1002/csr.1790 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.224 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.08.027 · DOI
- 10.1002/bse.441 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.108 · DOI
- 10.1080/09640568.2018.1537974 · DOI
- 10.1002/bse.2472 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10098-016-1323-8 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.006 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.10.033 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.08.020 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.enpol.2004.10.013 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00070-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.eist.2011.04.010 · DOI
- 10.22201/fca.24488410e.2019.1806 · DOI
- Wooldridge J. M., 2002, Econometric analyses of cross‐sectional and panel data
- Wooldridge J. M., 2016, Introductory econometrics: A modern approach
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.145 · DOI
- 10.1162/108819806775545321 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/bse.2054 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Schultz, F. C., Valentinov, V., Kirchherr, J., Reinhardt, R. J., & Pies, I. (2024) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.3592 · Cited by 82
Metadata
- Authors
- Kiefer, C. P., del Río, P., & Carrillo‐Hermosilla, J.
- Affiliations
- Institute for Public Policies and Goods (IPP) Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) Madrid Spain
- Department of Economics and Business and Banco Santander Chair of Corporate Social Responsibility Universidad de Alcalá (UAH) Alcalá de Henares Spain
- Venue
- Business Strategy and the Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2021-01-24
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1531-1547
- ISSN
- 0964-4733
- 1099-0836
- Cited by
- 78
- References
- 5
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review