The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Towards a collaboration framework for circular economy: The role of dynamic capabilities and open innovation
Abstract
Transitioning from linear to circular production systems requires interactions that include cross‐sectoral collaboration in networks. Understanding the role of collaboration within these networks can support the transition to a circular economy. To understand cross‐sectoral collaborative endeavors, this paper develops a collaboration framework for circular economy by combining and interlinking three theories: the relational view, open innovation, and dynamic capabilities. The framework is applied to the Circle‐House‐Project, a cross‐sectoral collaborative project aimed at scaling circular economy in the Danish construction sector. The explorative data included desk research and 15 semistructured interviews with expert project partners. The findings were transcribed, structured, coded, condensed, and categorized to provide an illustrative case based on a lighthouse project in the construction sector, affording a novel understanding of how cross‐sectoral collaboration can support advancing circular economy practices by developing knowledge‐sharing routines and ecocentric dynamic capabilities. The paper provides insights for academics and practitioners from a broad field by combining diverse interdisciplinary perspectives to unlock the potential of cross‐sectoral collaboration for advancing circular economy.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, it appears that the CE scholarship has not yet fully examined how stakeholder collaboration that is guided by functional governance could advance the systemic character of a CE (see, e.g., Blomsma et al., 2023; de Jesus et al., 2021; Köhler et al., 2022).”
From Stakeholder governance to facilitate collaboration for a systemic circular economy transition: A qualitative study in the European chemicals and plastics industry (2024) · cites this paper as Köhler et al., 2022
In the citing paper
“Lastly, Köhler et al. (2022) develop a cross-sectoral collaboration in networks' framework for CE. They contribute to our understanding of how cross-sectoral collaboration can support advancing CE practices by developing knowledge-sharing routines and eco-centric dynamic capabilities. They emphasize the importance of effective governance as a prerequisite for successful cross-sector collaborations”
From Stakeholder governance to facilitate collaboration for a systemic circular economy transition: A qualitative study in the European chemicals and plastics industry (2024) · cites this paper as Köhler et al., 2022
In the citing paper
“Schultz et al. (2024, p. 2174) found 'a gap in contemporary circular economy scholarship regarding the lack of knowledge on how precisely functional stakeholder governance for collaboration (K ¨ ohler et al., 2022) may pave the way for a transition to circular economy as a systemic change paradigm. '”
From Effective stakeholder governance in circular economy: Insights from Italian companies (2024) · cites this paper as Köhler et al., 2022
Citations
Cites
Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions
Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005 · Cited by 8,550
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 69
- 10.1680/jwarm.16.00011 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/smj.900 · DOI
- 10.1080/09537287.2017.1343502 · DOI
- 10.1108/09600031211231344 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.12.026 · DOI
- 10.1108/SCM-12-2013-0432 · DOI
- 10.1080/21681015.2016.1172124 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0008125619885150 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10551-014-2471-6 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10551-012-1519-8 · DOI
- 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2006.08.003 · DOI
- Bryman A. &Bell E.(2011).Business research methods.Oxford University press(3rd ed.). Oxford University press Inc.
- 10.1108/SCM-05-2013-0162 · DOI
- Chesbrough H. W., 2003, The era of open innovation, MIT Sloan Management Review, 44, 35
- 10.7748/nr.12.1.82.s2 · DOI
- 10.1080/09537287.2018.1449244 · DOI
- 10.1108/09574091011071915 · DOI
- 10.7880/abas.13.77 · DOI
- 10.1002/smj.2785 · DOI
- 10.1002/mde.1391 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2008.00609.x · DOI
- 10.5465/AMBPP.2018.82 · DOI
- 10.5465/amr.1989.4308385 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E · DOI
- 10.1177/0149206304272346 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.159 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/csr.207 · DOI
- Guba E. G., 2004, Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research
- Hawken P., 1999, Natural Capitalism: The Next Industrial Revolution
- 10.1108/IJLM-12-2019-0332 · DOI
- 10.1080/13662716.2017.1310034 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1540-5915.2012.00380.x · DOI
- 10.1016/J.LRP.2016.05.004 · DOI
- 10.5465/amr.35.2.zok315 · DOI
- 10.1002/bse.2447 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.04.028 · DOI · Paper page
- Kline D., 2003, Sharing the corporate crown jewels, MIT Sloan Management Review, 44, 89
- 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.041 · DOI · Paper page
- Kvale S., 2015, InterViews: Learning The Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.010 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3390/su8010043 · DOI
- 10.1002/bse.2699 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.03.002 · DOI
- McDonough W., 2010, Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.215 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1745-493X.2009.03162.x · DOI
- Pauli G., 2010, The blue economy: 10 years, 100 innovations, 100 million jobs
- Porrit J., 2007, Capitalism as if the World Matters
- 10.1177/0008125618759685 · DOI
- 10.1016/J.JIK.2018.03.004 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.005 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10551-008-9736-x · DOI
- Saldaña J., 2013, The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. International Journal
- 10.1080/01446193.2018.1435895 · DOI
- Saunders M. N. K., 2019, Research Methods for Business Students
- Siggelkow N. (2007).Persuation with case studies 1(50) 20–24. Retrieved 27 February from:https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Nicolaj‐Siggelkow/publication/234021898_Persuasion_With_Case_Studies/links/00b7d5339bd9404622000000/Persuasion‐With‐Case‐Studies.pdf · DOI · Paper page
- Steffen W., 2015, Planetary Boundaries: Guiding Human Development on a Changing Planet, 736
- 10.1002/job.2186 · DOI
- 10.1002/smj.640 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.11.006 · DOI
- 10.1561/111.00000010 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.pursup.2015.05.001 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.04.015 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/jsc.1906 · DOI
- Yin R. K., 2003, Case Study Research
- 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.10.006 · DOI
- Zimmann R., 2016, The Circular Economy in the Built Environment
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Schultz, F. C., Valentinov, V., Kirchherr, J., Reinhardt, R. J., & Pies, I. (2024) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.3592 · Cited by 82
Soluk, J., Decker-Lange, C., & Hack, A. (2023) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122490 · Cited by 73
Effective stakeholder governance in circular economy: Insights from Italian companies
Minoja, M., & Romano, G. (2024) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143584 · Cited by 35
An Empirical Study on Public Sector versus Third Sector Circular Economy-Oriented Innovations
Clifton, N., Kyaw, K. S., Liu, Z., & Walpole, G. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16041650 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Köhler, J., Sönnichsen, S. D., & Beske‐Jansen, P.
- Affiliations
- Department of Marketing and Department of Operations Management Copenhagen Business School Frederiksberg Denmark
- Venue
- Business Strategy and the Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2022-02-09
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2700-2713
- ISSN
- 0964-4733
- 1099-0836
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review