CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 131Corporate Social Responsibility ReportingEnvironmental Sustainability in BusinessSustainability and Innovation in Business

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The interplay of institutional pressures, digitalization capability, environmental, social, and governance strategy, and triple bottom line performance: A moderated mediation model

Open access
Lee, Min‐Jae, Pak, Anna, Roh, Taewoo·2024·Business Strategy and the Environment
DOI 10.1002/bse.3755
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Abstract This study seeks to elucidate the mediating role of environmental, social, and governance strategy (ESGS) in bridging the nexus between institutional pressures—specifically regulatory and stakeholder influences—and triple bottom line performance (TBLP), which encompasses economic, social, and environmental facets. Concurrently, this study examines the extent to which digitalization capability influences these dynamics. Utilizing a dataset from subsidiaries within China's retail and transportation sectors, we employed structural equation modeling alongside regression analysis to validate our hypotheses. The findings corroborate a partial mediating effect of ESGS on the TBLP in response to institutional pressures while highlighting digitalization capabilities' moderated mediation role in strengthening the relationship between institutional pressures and TBL through ESGS implementation. By weaving together institutional theory and dynamic capability perspectives, this study advances the understanding of strategic avenues that influence TBLP through ESGS and offers managerial insights for effectively leveraging ESG strategies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/bse.3755

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Research works printed but not linked: 122

  1. 10.1287/stsc.2019.0099 · DOI
  2. 10.1002/bse.2977 · DOI
  3. 10.1108/02651330410539620 · DOI
  4. 10.1108/IJPPM-12-2020-0676 · DOI
  5. 10.1002/bse.2301 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120635 · DOI
  7. 10.1177/002224377701400320 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.187 · DOI
  9. 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122272 · DOI
  11. 10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.125 · DOI
  12. 10.1002/smj.2041 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.002 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.014 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113621 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.03.035 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.039 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134951 · DOI
  19. 10.1093/icc/11.3.529 · DOI
  20. 10.1007/s10551-014-2268-7 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.respol.2021.104289 · DOI
  22. 10.1007/s10551-020-04441-4 · DOI
  23. Cohen J., 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
  24. 10.1002/bse.732 · DOI
  25. 10.1057/jibs.2012.1 · DOI
  26. 10.1002/bse.409 · DOI
  27. 10.1002/smj.701 · DOI
  28. 10.1002/bse.2492 · DOI
  29. 10.1111/1467-8551.12388 · DOI
  30. 10.2307/2095101 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1007/s10551-019-04164-1 · DOI
  32. 10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.2.08 · DOI
  33. 10.1111/jacf.12267 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.jwb.2007.11.012 · DOI
  35. Elkington J., 2018, 25 years ago I coined the phrase “triple bottom line.” Here's why it's time to rethink it, Harvard Business Review, 25, 2
  36. 10.1016/j.strueco.2004.04.004 · DOI
  37. 10.1002/bse.1939 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1086/209351 · DOI
  39. 10.1007/s10551-012-1607-9 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/j.bushor.2020.01.005 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.06.013 · DOI
  42. 10.1002/bse.2656 · DOI
  43. 10.3390/su132212844 · DOI
  44. 10.1007/s10551-014-2047-5 · DOI
  45. Hair J. F., 2009, Multivariate Data Analysis
  46. Hair J. F., 2016, A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS‐SEM)
  47. Issah W. B. Ferdous L. T. Bhuiyan F. &Sharif T.(2024).Digitalisation and environmental management activities: The effects of family ownership. Manuscript submitted for publication. · DOI
  48. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110416 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1108/JOCM-10-2021-0321 · DOI
  50. Johnson M. W., 2008, Reinventing your business model, Harvard Business Review, 86, 57
  51. 10.1002/bse.2979 · DOI
  52. 10.1007/s12063‐021‐00181‐4 · DOI
  53. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127015 · DOI
  54. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.02.008 · DOI
  55. 10.5465/amr.2008.34422026 · DOI
  56. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.353 · DOI
  57. 10.1142/S1363919614400106 · DOI
  58. Lee M.‐J. &Roh T.(2023a).Digitalization capability and sustainable performance in emerging markets: Mediating roles of in/out‐bound open innovation and coopetition strategy. Manuscript submitted for publication. · DOI
  59. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137433 · DOI
  60. 10.1002/mar.20975 · DOI
  61. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.08.007 · DOI
  62. 10.1016/j.indmarman.2022.04.007 · DOI
  63. 10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107777 · DOI · Paper page
  64. 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.887776 · DOI
  65. 10.1111/j.1540-627X.2009.00271.x · DOI
  66. 10.1002/bse.2036 · DOI
  67. 10.1016/j.lrp.2015.12.010 · DOI
  68. 10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.114 · DOI · Paper page
  69. 10.1002/bse.1906 · DOI
  70. 10.1002/bse.1927 · DOI
  71. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.070 · DOI
  72. Magretta J., 2002, Why business models matter, Harvard Business Review, 80
  73. 10.1002/csr.1837 · DOI
  74. 10.1108/EBR-09-2015-0095 · DOI
  75. 10.1086/226550 · DOI · Paper page
  76. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.072 · DOI
  77. 10.1007/s11356-021-13381-z · DOI
  78. 10.1002/bsd2.46 · DOI
  79. 10.1257/jep.9.4.119 · DOI
  80. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.006 · DOI · Paper page
  81. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.08.014 · DOI
  82. 10.1002/bse.2209 · DOI
  83. 10.2307/1556406 · DOI · Paper page
  84. 10.1177/002224378101800401 · DOI
  85. 10.1002/smj.4250121008 · DOI · Paper page
  86. Porter M. E., 2014, How smart, connected products are transforming competition, Harvard Business Review, 92, 64
  87. 10.3758/BRM.40.3.879 · DOI · Paper page
  88. 10.1002/bse.2275 · DOI
  89. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123282 · DOI
  90. 10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.11.019 · DOI
  91. 10.1016/S0148-2963(99)00071-5 · DOI
  92. 10.1016/j.ausmj.2019.05.003 · DOI
  93. 10.1177/1354816618823921 · DOI · Paper page
  94. Scott W. R., 2013, Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities
  95. 10.1007/s10551-014-2401-7 · DOI
  96. 10.1002/bse.2906 · DOI
  97. 10.1002/bse.2450 · DOI
  98. 10.2307/258788 · DOI · Paper page
  99. 10.1002/smj.640 · DOI · Paper page
  100. 10.1016/j.lrp.2017.06.007 · DOI · Paper page
  101. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z · DOI · Paper page
  102. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2004.01.009 · DOI
  103. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.035 · DOI · Paper page
  104. 10.1016/j.jom.2003.02.002 · DOI
  105. 10.1111/1467-8551.12066 · DOI
  106. 10.1007/s10551-009-0306-7 · DOI
  107. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.03.034 · DOI
  108. 10.1002/bse.1983 · DOI
  109. 10.1108/MD-05-2019-0678 · DOI
  110. 10.1002/smj.318 · DOI · Paper page
  111. 10.1007/s11573-019-00950-5 · DOI
  112. 10.1007/s10551-012-1603-0 · DOI
  113. 10.1016/j.envres.2021.110718 · DOI
  114. 10.1007/s10551-012-1243-4 · DOI
  115. 10.1002/bse.1923 · DOI
  116. 10.1080/00207543.2014.931608 · DOI
  117. 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.12.005 · DOI
  118. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129992 · DOI
  119. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.093 · DOI
  120. 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.023 · DOI
  121. 10.1086/651257 · DOI · Paper page
  122. 10.1016/j.pursup.2012.12.001 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lee, M., Pak, A., & Roh, T.
Affiliations
  • Mokwon University (KR)
  • Kean University (US)
  • Hanyang University (KR)
Corresponding author
Roh, Taewoo
ORCID
Venue
Business Strategy and the Environment
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-03-31
Volume
33
Issue
6
Pages
5247-5268
ISSN
  • 0964-4733 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0836
DOI
10.1002/bse.3755
OpenAlex
W4393358083
Cited by
131
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 65 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 10
FWCI
44.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
Business Strategy and the Environment (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
Mokwon University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Sustainability and Innovation in Business
Keywords
institutional pressures, digitalization capabilities, triple bottom line performance, regulatory pressure, stakeholder pressure, moderated mediation, dynamic capabilities, institutional theory, Chinese subsidiaries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review