The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Integrating Suppliers into Green Product Innovation Development: an Empirical Case Study in the Semiconductor Industry
Open accessAbstract
Green innovation has been recognized as one of the key factors to achieve environmental and economic success in markets. Understanding green product innovation development as a result of suppliers' involvement has become a strategic priority for academics and practitioners. This paper aims to explore and understand the role of suppliers in enhancing the manufacturer's ability to successfully carry out green innovation in product development. As a research methodology, a case study approach is employed. Primary data were collected through site visits and extensive interviews with corporate and plant management in Korea. Based on the Korean study, the paper presents following outcomes. First, there is a strong linkage between environmental compliance and green new product developments. Second, there is a strategically close relationship of environmental collaboration between suppliers and the buying company through technological integration. Finally, involving key suppliers in green new product development for environmentally demanding customers and markets can bring both environmental and commercial success. This research provides new insights on supplier involvement and green product innovation development in supply chain management. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2007.24160888 · Cited by 16,670
Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship
Porter, M. E., & Linde, C. V. D. (1995) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.9.4.97 · Cited by 13,365
(1993) · Cited by 7,856
From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management
Seuring, S., & Müller, M. (2008) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.020 · Cited by 6,341
The Influence of Green Innovation Performance on Corporate Advantage in Taiwan
Chen, Y.-S., Lai, S.-B., & Wen, C.-T. (2006) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9025-5 · Cited by 2,684
A contingent resource-based view of proactive corporate environmental strategy
Aragón-Correa, J. A., & Sharma, S. (2003) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2003.8925233 · Cited by 2,362
The Core Competence of the Corporation
Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1997) · Strategische Unternehmungsplanung / Strategische Unternehmungsführung · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-41482-8_46 · Cited by 2,099
Jaffe, A. B., & Peterson, S. R. (1995) · Journal of Economic Literature · Cited by 1,874
The Role of Corporations in Achieving Ecological Sustainability
Shrivastava, P. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258961 · Cited by 1,749
Mainstreaming Green Product Innovation: Why and How Companies Integrate Environmental Sustainability
Dangelico, R. M., & Pujari, D. (2010) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0434-0 · Cited by 1,422
Cited by
Xie, X., Huo, J., & Zou, H. (2019) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.010 · Cited by 1,370
Green R&D for eco-innovation and its impact on carbon emissions and firm performance
Lee, K.-H., & Min, B. (2015) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.114 · Cited by 1,028
Self-citationGreen Product Innovation: Where we are and Where we are Going
Dangelico, R. M. (2016) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.1886 · Cited by 676
The link between eco-innovation and business performance: a Taiwanese industry context
Cheng, C. C. J., Yang, C.-L., & Sheu, C. (2014) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.09.050 · Cited by 607
Abu Seman, N. A., Govindan, K., Mardani, A., Zakuan, N., Mat Saman, M. Z., Hooker, R. E., & Ozkul, S. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.211 · Cited by 574
Loaning scale and government subsidy for promoting green innovation
Huang, Z., Liao, G., & Li, Z. (2019) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.04.023 · Cited by 561
Supply chain collaboration for sustainability: A literature review and future research agenda
Chen, L., Zhao, X., Tang, O., Price, L., Zhang, S., & Zhu, W. (2017) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.04.005 · Cited by 560
Wong, S. K. S. (2013) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.1746 · Cited by 356
Wu, G. (2013) · Supply Chain Management: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/scm-06-2012-0201 · Cited by 324
Awan, U., Sroufe, R., & Kraslawski, A. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.308 · Cited by 312
Mardani, A., Kannan, D., Hooker, R. E., Ozkul, S., Alrasheedi, M., & Tirkolaee, E. B. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119383 · Cited by 266
Environmental strategies, upgrading and competitive advantage in global value chains
Marchi, V. D., Maria, E. D., & Micelli, S. (2013) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.1738 · Cited by 254
CSR ‘sustainability’ practices and firm performance in an emerging economy
Sardana, D., Gupta, N., Kumar, V., & Terziovski, M. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120766 · Cited by 238
Buhl, A., Schmidt-Keilich, M., Muster, V., Blazejewski, S., Schrader, U., Harrach, C., Schäfer, M., & Süßbauer, E. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.259 · Cited by 188
Zhang, W., Xu, F., & Wang, X. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12093841 · Cited by 129
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, K., & Kim, J.
- Venue
- Business Strategy and the Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-04-27
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 527-538
- ISSN
- 0964-4733 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0836
- OpenAlex
- W1883038401
- Cited by
- 342
- References
- 51
- FWCI
- 32.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
