A Retrospective Analysis of Children's Assessment Reports: What Helps Children Tell?
Abstract
This paper explores a retrospective analysis of children's file data as a research method of gathering information on children's experiences of informal disclosure of child sexual abuse. This study extracted data from files where children were seen for a child sexual abuse evaluation in Ireland and the children were deemed to have given a credible account of abuse by the professionals concerned. A content analysis was conducted using themes identified in previously published research, based on direct interviews with children about their experiences of informal disclosure. The paper discusses the relative merits and limitations of this method, through reporting on the findings of the file analysis and comparing these findings with findings obtained from a smaller sub‐sample of this sample of children, who were interviewed about their experiences of disclosure. It is suggested that this method is worth exploring with a larger sample size which would enable statistical analysis and thus explore the predictive factors influencing early informal disclosure. Frontline services can contribute to the knowledge base on what helps children tell through service‐based research that uses data already collected from evaluation interviews with children, thus eliminating the need to interview children for research purposes. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. ‘A content analysis was conducted using themes identified in previously published research’ Key Practitioner Messages: Frontline professionals gather useful data on a daily basis on informal disclosures of child sexual abuse. Practitioners can contribute to the knowledge base on informal disclosure by systematically gathering information from service users. We need more information on what helps children tell. We therefore need to explore innovative methods of gathering such information directly from children in ways that do not rely on interviewing children repeatedly yet include the child's voice. ‘We need more information on what helps children tell’
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Disclosure of CSA is fraught with difficulties for those making disclosures including risk of not being believed, self-blame, shame/guilt, fear of reprisal, and concern for the safety and wellbeing of self and others (Goodman-Brown et al., 2003; McElvaney & Culhane, 2017).
“Disclosure of CSA is fraught with difficulties for those making disclosures including; risk of not being believed, self-blame, shame/guilt, fear of reprisal, and concern for the safety and wellbeing of self and others (Goodman-Brown et al., 2003; McElvaney & Culhane, 2017).”
From Recall of sexual abuse prevention education at school and home: Associations with sexual abuse experience, disclosure, protective parenting, and knowledge (2022) · cites this paper as McElvaney & Culhane, 2017
Victim testimony attests to the difficulties in disclosing CSA, and CSA disclosure is dependent on numerous factors including the identity of the perpetrator, the perpetrator-victim relationship, and cultural factors (Goodman-Brown et al., 2003; Fontes & Plummer, 2010; McElvaney & Culhane, 2017).
“Victim testimony attests to the difficulties in disclosing CSA, and CSA disclosure is dependent on numerous factors including the identity of the perpetrator, the perpetrator-victim relationship, and cultural factors (Goodman-Brown et al., 2003; Fontes & Plummer, 2010; McElvaney & Culhane, 2017).”
From Recall of sexual abuse prevention education at school and home: Associations with sexual abuse experience, disclosure, protective parenting, and knowledge (2022) · cites this paper as McElvaney & Culhane, 2017
Cites
A Guide to Conducting Consensual Qualitative Research
Hill, C. E., Thompson, B. J., & Williams, E. N. (1997) · The Counseling Psychologist · doi:10.1177/0011000097254001 · Cited by 2,884 · see citing works
Why children tell: a model of children’s disclosure of sexual abuse
Goodman-Brown, T. B., Edelstein, R. S., Goodman, G. S., Jones, D. P. H., & Gordon, D. S. (2003) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/s0145-2134(03)00037-1 · Cited by 560 · see citing works
Exploring the disclosure of child sexual abuse with alleged victims and their parents
Hershkowitz, I., Lanes, O., & Lamb, M. E. (2007) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2006.09.004 · Cited by 400 · see citing works
Lalor, K., & McElvaney, R. (2010) · Trauma, Violence, & Abuse · doi:10.1177/1524838010378299 · Cited by 376 · see citing works
Jensen, T. K., Gulbrandsen, W., Mossige, S., Reichelt, S., & Tjersland, O. A. (2005) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2005.07.004 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
Adolescents who experienced sexual abuse: fears, needs and impediments to disclosure
Crisma, M., Bascelli, E., Paci, D., & Romito, P. (2004) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2004.03.015 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Patterns of Disclosure in Child Sexual Abuse
Collings, S. J., Griffiths, S., & Kumalo, M. (2005) · South African Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1177/008124630503500207 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Facilitators and Barriers to Child Sexual Abuse (CSA) Disclosures: A Research Update (2000–2016)
Alaggia, R., Collin-Vézina, D., & Lateef, R. (2019) · Trauma, Violence, & Abuse · doi:10.1177/1524838017697312 · Cited by 532 · see citing works
“Further, shame, self-blame, and fear have been identified as significant factors deterring disclosure (Collin-Vézina et al., 2015; Crisma et al., 2004; Goodman-Brown et al., 2003; Hunter, 2011; Kogan, 2004; McElvaney & Culhane, 2015; McElvaney et al., 2014).”
BackgroundRecipients of children’s and adolescents’ disclosures of childhood sexual abuse: A systematic review
Manay, N., & Collin-Vézina, D. (2021) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104192 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Rudolph, J. I., Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., & Walsh, K. (2022) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2022.105680 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Gemara, N., Mishna, F., & Katz, C. (2025) · Child & Family Social Work · doi:10.1111/cfs.13069 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Factors related to delayed disclosure among victims of child sexual abuse in Singapore
Hemanth, P., Fang, L., Chong, S., & Tan, L. J. (2024) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.106647 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
- Authors
- McElvaney, R., & Culhane, M.
- Affiliations
- Dublin City University (IE)
- University College Dublin (IE)
- Corresponding author
- McElvaney, Rosaleen
- ORCID
- McElvaney, Rosaleen
- Venue
- Child Abuse Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-07-31
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 103-115
- ISSN
- 0952-9136 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0852
- OpenAlex
- W1575142234
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4
- FWCI
- 2.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Child Abuse Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Military, Security, and Education Studies
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
- Keywords
- child sexual abuse, child protection services, frontline workers, children's voices
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review