Cited by 34Child Abuse and TraumaMilitary, Security, and Education StudiesSexual Assault and Victimization Studies

A Retrospective Analysis of Children's Assessment Reports: What Helps Children Tell?

McElvaney, Rosaleen, Culhane, Maebh·2017·Child Abuse Review

Abstract

This paper explores a retrospective analysis of children's file data as a research method of gathering information on children's experiences of informal disclosure of child sexual abuse. This study extracted data from files where children were seen for a child sexual abuse evaluation in Ireland and the children were deemed to have given a credible account of abuse by the professionals concerned. A content analysis was conducted using themes identified in previously published research, based on direct interviews with children about their experiences of informal disclosure. The paper discusses the relative merits and limitations of this method, through reporting on the findings of the file analysis and comparing these findings with findings obtained from a smaller sub‐sample of this sample of children, who were interviewed about their experiences of disclosure. It is suggested that this method is worth exploring with a larger sample size which would enable statistical analysis and thus explore the predictive factors influencing early informal disclosure. Frontline services can contribute to the knowledge base on what helps children tell through service‐based research that uses data already collected from evaluation interviews with children, thus eliminating the need to interview children for research purposes. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. ‘A content analysis was conducted using themes identified in previously published research’ Key Practitioner Messages: Frontline professionals gather useful data on a daily basis on informal disclosures of child sexual abuse. Practitioners can contribute to the knowledge base on informal disclosure by systematically gathering information from service users. We need more information on what helps children tell. We therefore need to explore innovative methods of gathering such information directly from children in ways that do not rely on interviewing children repeatedly yet include the child's voice. ‘We need more information on what helps children tell’

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/car.2390

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Disclosure of CSA is fraught with difficulties for those making disclosures including risk of not being believed, self-blame, shame/guilt, fear of reprisal, and concern for the safety and wellbeing of self and others (Goodman-Brown et al., 2003; McElvaney & Culhane, 2017).

    “Disclosure of CSA is fraught with difficulties for those making disclosures including; risk of not being believed, self-blame, shame/guilt, fear of reprisal, and concern for the safety and wellbeing of self and others (Goodman-Brown et al., 2003; McElvaney & Culhane, 2017).”
  • Victim testimony attests to the difficulties in disclosing CSA, and CSA disclosure is dependent on numerous factors including the identity of the perpetrator, the perpetrator-victim relationship, and cultural factors (Goodman-Brown et al., 2003; Fontes & Plummer, 2010; McElvaney & Culhane, 2017).

    “Victim testimony attests to the difficulties in disclosing CSA, and CSA disclosure is dependent on numerous factors including the identity of the perpetrator, the perpetrator-victim relationship, and cultural factors (Goodman-Brown et al., 2003; Fontes & Plummer, 2010; McElvaney & Culhane, 2017).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McElvaney, R., & Culhane, M.
Affiliations
  • Dublin City University (IE)
  • University College Dublin (IE)
Corresponding author
McElvaney, Rosaleen
Venue
Child Abuse Review
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-07-31
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
103-115
ISSN
  • 0952-9136 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0852
OpenAlex
W1575142234
Cited by
34
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4
FWCI
2.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Child Abuse Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Military, Security, and Education Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
Keywords
child sexual abuse, child protection services, frontline workers, children's voices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review