The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ethical values and motives driving organic food choice
Abstract
The role of ethical motives in consumers' choice of organic food was investigated. A self-administered questionnaire was conducted on a representative sample of 1283 Norwegian adults. The relations between ethical food choice motives, attitudes and intention to consume organic food was studied by estimating a structural equation model. Environmental and animal rights issues had a strong influence on attitudes towards organic food, suggesting that the more people are concerned about these issues, the more positive attitude they have towards organic food, and the more likely it is that they will consume organic food. Also, political motives had some positive influence on attitudes, while religion was not important as a food choice criterion. Implications of our findings for marketers are discussed. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005 · Cited by 27,200
Schwartz, S. H. (1992) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60281-6 · Cited by 14,619
New Environmental Theories: Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior
Stern, P. C. (2000) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00175 · Cited by 8,682
Intention—Behavior Relations: A Conceptual and Empirical Review
Sheeran, P. (2002) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/14792772143000003 · Cited by 3,688
The “new environmental paradigm”
Dunlap, R. E., & Van Liere, K. D. (1978) · The Journal of Environmental Education · doi:10.1080/00958964.1978.10801875 · Cited by 2,833
STEPTOE, A., POLLARD, T. M., & WARDLE, J. (1995) · Appetite · doi:10.1006/appe.1995.0061 · Cited by 2,176
Magnusson, M. K., Arvola, A., Hursti, U.-K. K., Åberg, L., & Sjödén, P.-O. (2003) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/s0195-6663(03)00002-3 · Cited by 941
Measurement of ethical food choice motives
Lindeman, M., & Väänänen, M. (2000) · Appetite · doi:10.1006/appe.1999.0293 · Cited by 437
Cited by
Pro‐environmental products: marketing influence on consumer purchase decision
Pickett‐Baker, J., & Ozaki, R. (2008) · Journal of Consumer Marketing · doi:10.1108/07363760810890516 · Cited by 1,020
Michaelidou, N., & Hassan, L. M. (2008) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1470-6431.2007.00619.x · Cited by 989
Decisional factors driving organic food consumption: Generation of consumer purchase intentions
Teng, C.-C., & Wang, Y.-M. (2015) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/bfj-12-2013-0361 · Cited by 391
Shin, Y. H., Im, J., Jung, S. E., & Severt, K. (2018) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2017.10.011 · Cited by 358
Kareklas, I., Carlson, J. R., & Muehling, D. D. (2014) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.2013.799450 · Cited by 343
Metadata
- Authors
- Honkanen, P., Verplanken, B., & Olsen, S. O.
- Venue
- Journal of Consumer Behaviour
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 420-430
- ISSN
- 1472-0817 (ISSN-L)
- 1479-1838
- OpenAlex
- W2058528135
- Cited by
- 626
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 7.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ethical values and motives driving organic food choice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cb.190
- The paper
- Honkanen, P., Verplanken, B., & Olsen, S. O. (2006). Ethical values and motives driving organic food choice. Journal of Consumer Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.190
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
