Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 264

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Apple‐Biowaste‐Derived Hard Carbon as a Powerful Anode Material for Na‐Ion Batteries

Wu, Liming, Buchholz, Daniel, Vaalma, Christoph, Giffin, Guinevere A., Passerini, Stefano·2016·ChemElectroChem

Abstract

Modern industrial agriculture is strongly influenced by product norms and standards, resulting in massive amounts of fresh fruit that is left in the field or wasted in spite of their good nutritional value. Herein, we present the synthesis of hard carbon from natural apple biowaste, and its use of biomass is a suitable strategy for the development of cheap and powerful carbon‐based active materials for Na‐ion batteries. The hard carbon exhibits a good rate capability [112 mAh g−1 at 5 C (1 A g−1)], excellent long‐term cycling stability (1000 cycles at 5 C), and high specific capacity (245 mAh g−1 at 0.1 C) with full retention after 80 cycles. The full capacity (250 mAh g−1) of the hard carbon is also obtained in Na‐ion cells by using the layered P2‐type NaxNi 0.22 Co 0.11 Mn 0.66 O 2 cathode. The good electrochemical performance as well as the low cost and environmental friendliness of the apple‐biowaste‐derived hard carbon proves its suitability for future Na‐ion batteries.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/celc.201500437

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 264

Metadata

Authors
Wu, L., Buchholz, D., Vaalma, C., Giffin, G. A., & Passerini, S.
Venue
ChemElectroChem
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-12-15
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
292-298
ISSN
2196-0216 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2189572399
Cited by
264
References
38
FWCI
9.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.