Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 712

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cancer‐related fatigue: Evolving concepts in evaluation and treatment

Open access
Stasi, Roberto, Abriani, Luca, Beccaglia, Patrizia, Terzoli, Edmondo, Amadori, Sergio·2003·Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although fatigue is one of the most common complaints of patients with cancer, it went unrecognized or overlooked for many years, until clinicians achieved better control over the more acute symptoms of nausea, emesis, and pain. A number of treatment‐related and disease‐related factors may contribute to the development of fatigue, but its physiologic basis remains poorly understood, and many proposed interventions have not been studied systematically. The lack of a standard of care for the assessment or treatment of fatigue in patients with cancer has limited research in this field. A critical appraisal of these issues is presented in this review. METHODS: The published literature was reviewed for definition, prevalence, causes, and means of managing cancer‐related fatigue (CRF). RESULTS: Fatigue was reportedly present at the time of diagnosis in approximately 50–75% of cancer patients. The prevalence of CRF increased to 80–96% in patients undergoing chemotherapy and to 60–93% in patients receiving radiotherapy. Two tested interventions that showed consistent effects to alleviate CRF were treatment of cancer‐related anemia with erythropoietin agents (recombinant human erythropoietin and darbepotin α) and aerobic exercise. CONCLUSIONS: Several lines of research are needed to bridge the specific gaps in the current knowledge of CRF. These involve the pathophysiology of the symptom, the validation of diagnostic criteria, and specific therapeutic interventions. Current practice guidelines are based on a combination of research and expert clinical judgment and should be used to guide care with the expectation that they will evolve to incorporate the results of studies currently underway. Cancer 2003. © 2003 American Cancer Society.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cncr.11742

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Cited by

See all 712

Metadata

Authors
Stasi, R., Abriani, L., Beccaglia, P., Terzoli, E., & Amadori, S.
Venue
Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-10-22
Volume
98
Issue
9
Pages
1786-1801
ISSN
  • 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0142
OpenAlex
W1993714077
Cited by
712
References
33
FWCI
8.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cancer‐related fatigue: Evolving concepts in evaluation and treatment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.11742
The paper
Stasi, R., Abriani, L., Beccaglia, P., Terzoli, E., & Amadori, S. (2003). Cancer‐related fatigue: Evolving concepts in evaluation and treatment. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.11742

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.