Cited by 67Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesPalliative and Oncologic CareNursing care and research

A lay navigator‐led, early palliative care intervention for African American and rural family caregivers of individuals with advanced cancer (Project Cornerstone): Results of a pilot randomized trial

Open access
Dionne‐Odom, J. Nicholas, Azuero, Andres, Taylor, Richard A., Dosse, Chinara, Bechthold, Avery C., Currie, Erin, Reed, Rhiannon D., Harrell, Erin R. +7 more·2022·Cancer

Abstract

Background: The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and potential efficacy of ENABLE (Educate, Nurture, Advise, Before Life Ends) Cornerstone—a lay navigator‐led, early palliative care telehealth intervention for African American/Black and/or rural‐dwelling family caregivers of individuals with advanced cancer (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03464188). Methods: This was a pilot randomized trial (November 2019 to March 2021). Family caregivers of patients with newly diagnosed, stage III/IV, solid‐tumor cancers were randomized to receive either an intervention or usual care. Intervention caregivers were paired with a specially trained lay navigator who delivered 6 weekly, 20‐minute to 60‐minute telehealth coaching sessions plus monthly follow‐up for 24 weeks, reviewing skills in stress management, self‐care, getting help, staying organized, and future planning. Feasibility was assessed according to the completion of sessions and questionnaires (predefined as a completion rate ≥80%). Acceptability was determined through intervention participants' ratings of their likelihood of recommending the intervention. Measures of caregiver distress and quality of life were collected at 8 and 24 weeks. Results: Sixty‐three family caregivers were randomized (usual care, n = 32; intervention, n = 31). Caregivers completed 65% of intervention sessions and 87% of questionnaires. Average ratings for recommending the program were 9.4, from 1 (not at all likely) to 10 (extremely likely). Over 24 weeks, the mean ± SE Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale score improved by 0.30 ± 1.44 points in the intervention group and worsened by 1.99 ± 1.39 points in the usual care group (difference, −2.29; Cohen d, −0.32). The mean between‐group difference scores in caregiver quality of life was −1.56 (usual care − intervention; d, −0.07). Similar outcome results were observed for patient participants. Conclusions: The authors piloted ENABLE Cornerstone, an intervention for African American and rural‐dwelling advanced cancer family caregivers. The acceptability of the intervention and data collection rates were high, and the preliminary efficacy for caregiver distress was promising. Lay Summary: To date, very few programs have been developed to support under‐resourced cancer family caregivers. To address this need, the authors successfully pilot tested an early palliative care program, called Educate, Nurture, Advise, Before Life Ends (ENABLE) Cornerstone, for African American and rural family caregivers of individuals with advanced cancer. Cornerstone is led by specially trained lay people and involves a series of weekly phone sessions focused on coaching caregivers to manage stress and provide effective support to patients with cancer. The authors are now testing Cornerstone in a larger trial. If the program demonstrates benefit, it may yield a model of caregiver support that could be widely implemented.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cncr.34044

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [3]Center to Advance Palliative Care and the National Palliative Care Research Center. America’s Care of Serious Illness: A State-by-State Report Card on Access to Palliative Care in Our Nation’s Hospitals. New York, NY 2019. PMC3391707 21923412
  2. [13]National Academies of Sciences E, and Medicine,. Improving access to and equity of care for people with serious illness. Washington, DC 2019. 31525012

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dionne‐Odom, J. N., Azuero, A., Taylor, R. A., Dosse, C., Bechthold, A. C., Currie, E., Reed, R. D., Harrell, E. R., Engler, S., Ejem, D. B., Ivankova, N. V., Martin, M. Y., Rocque, G. B., Williams, G. R., & Bakitas, M. A.
Affiliations
  • School of Nursing University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) Birmingham Alabama
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • University of Alabama (US)
  • University of Tennessee Health Science Center (US)
Venue
Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-12-07
Volume
128
Issue
6
Pages
1321-1330
ISSN
  • 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0142
OpenAlex
W4200528096
Cited by
67
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 4
FWCI
8.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Nursing Research (R00NR015903)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
Keywords
family caregivers, advanced cancer, early palliative care, telehealth coaching, African American caregivers, rural caregivers, caregiver distress, caregiver quality of life, feasibility and acceptability, stress management, self-care, future planning, patient-reported outcomes, patient-reported quality of life
MeSH terms
Black or African American, Humans, Neoplasms, Palliative Care, Pilot Projects, Quality of Life, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review