Cited by 25Psychedelics and Drug StudiesCancer survivorship and careReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology

Acceptability of psilocybin‐assisted group therapy in patients with cancer and major depressive disorder: Qualitative analysis

Open access
Beaussant, Yvan, Tarbi, Elise, Nigam, Kabir, Miner, Skye, Sager, Zachary, Sanders, Justin J., Ljuslin, Michael, Guérin, Benjamin +3 more·2024·Cancer

Abstract

Background: The present study explored the acceptability of psilocybin‐assisted group therapy from the perspective of patients with cancer and depression who participated in a clinical trial assessing the safety and efficacy of this novel intervention. Methods: Guided by the conceptual framework of acceptability, the authors conducted semi‐structured interviews with participants of the psilocybin trial. Data were analyzed using template and thematic analyses. Results: Participants’ (n = 28) perspectives on the acceptability of the group and simultaneous sessions was generally positive, both in terms of safety and efficacy: first, the groups contributed to increase participants’ sense of safety and preparedness as they were engaging in the therapy; and second, the groups fostered a sense of connection and of belonging, which served to enrich and deepen the meaning of participants’ experience, ultimately opening a dimension of self‐transcendence and compassion. Other subthemes related to factors influencing the acceptability of the group approach included: 1) the importance of the therapeutic framework, 2) the complementary value of individual sessions, 3) disruptive factors related to the group and/or simultaneous setting, and 4) opportunities and challenges related to group size and how to structure interactions. Conclusions: This study enhances understanding of what promotes acceptability of the psilocybin‐assisted therapy group model for the treatment of MDD in cancer patients. Plain Language Summary: We conducted exit interviews with participants of a phase 2 trial of psilocybin‐assisted therapy (PAT) conducted in a community cancer center, to assess the acceptability of a novel psilocybin delivery model combining simultaneous individual therapy and group sessions. Our findings support the acceptability of this intervention and suggest that in addition to being feasible, it might also enhance participants’ perceived safety and efficacy compared to uniquely individual or group delivery models of PAT. Our analysis highlights critical factors conditioning acceptability and suggests new ways PAT may be scaled and integrated into cancer care.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cncr.35024

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some patients may experience a worsening of symptoms with psilocybin treatments.

    “Despite the recent enthusiasm over psychedelics, studies (including the ones in this issue) show that not every patient will benefit from these treatments, and some patients may even experience a worsening of symptoms.”

    From Innovations in group-based psilocybin-assisted therapy of major depression in patients with cancer (2024) · cites this paper as [15]

    In “Disruptive factors emerging from the group/simultaneous setting” (page not provided), one participant said the group format added anxiety to an experience they had hoped would be therapeutic. That supports a narrower account of increased anxiety during group therapy, but the paper does not report a worsening of patients’ depressive symptoms after psilocybin treatment; its Introduction instead reports sustained depressive-symptom responses in 80% of the trial participants. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A follow-up qualitative interview study was conducted among a subset of participants (N = 28) to explore participant acceptability of psilocybin-assisted group therapy.

    “A follow-up qualitative interview study was conducted among a subset of participants in the trial (N = 28) to explore participant acceptability of psilocybin-assisted group therapy.15”
  • Specific benefits of the group format mentioned by participants included a feeling of safety and preparedness and a sense of connection to others in the group that may have supported treatment outcomes.

    “Specific benefits of the group format mentioned by participants included a feeling of safety and preparedness and a sense of connection to others in the group that may have supported treatment outcomes.”
  • Participants in the qualitative study reported overall positive experiences with the group format, mirroring the improvement in quantitative outcomes.

    “Participants reported overall positive experiences with the group format, mirroring the improvement in quantitative outcomes.”
  • Studies (including the ones in this issue) show that not every patient will benefit from psilocybin treatments.

    “Despite the recent enthusiasm over psychedelics, studies (including the ones in this issue) show that not every patient will benefit from these treatments, and some patients may even experience a worsening of symptoms.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beaussant, Y., Tarbi, E., Nigam, K., Miner, S., Sager, Z., Sanders, J. J., Ljuslin, M., Guérin, B., Thambi, P., Tulsky, J. A., & Agrawal, M.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Vermont (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (US)
  • McGill University (CA)
  • University of Geneva (CH)
  • Université de Franche-Comté (FR)
  • Maryland Geological Survey (US)
Corresponding author
Beaussant, Yvan
Venue
Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-12-18
Volume
130
Issue
7
Pages
1147-1157
ISSN
  • 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0142
OpenAlex
W4389895437
Cited by
25
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1
FWCI
7.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychedelics and Drug Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Keywords
psilocybin-assisted therapy, group therapy, acceptability, cancer patients, major depressive disorder, psychedelic therapy, sense of belonging, self-transcendence, group size, therapeutic framework
MeSH terms
Major Depressive Disorder, Humans, Neoplasms, Psilocybin, Psychotherapy, Psychotherapy, Group

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review