Cited by 52

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Compensatory redistribution of neuroligins and N-cadherin following deletion of synaptic β1-integrin

Mortillo, Steven, Elste, Alice, Ge, Yongchao, Patil, Shekhar B., Hsiao, Kuangfu, Huntley, George W., Davis, Ronald L., Benson, Deanna L.·2012·Journal of Comparative Neurology

Abstract

β1‐containing integrins are required for persistent synaptic potentiation in hippocampus and regulate hippocampal‐dependent learning. Based largely on indirect evidence, there is a prevailing assumption that β1‐integrins are localized at synapses, where they contribute to synapse adhesion and signaling, but this has not been examined directly. Here we investigate the fine localization of β1‐integrin in adult mouse hippocampus using high‐resolution immunogold labeling, with a particular emphasis on synaptic labeling patterns. We find that β1‐integrins localize to synapses in CA1 and are concentrated postsynaptically. At the postsynaptic membrane, β1‐integrins are found more commonly clustered near active zone centers rather than at the peripheral edges. In mice harboring a conditional deletion of β1‐integrins, labeling for N‐cadherin and neuroligins increases. Western blots show increased levels of N‐cadherin in total lysates and neuroligins increase selectively in synaptosomes. These data suggest there is a dynamic, compensatory adjustment of synaptic adhesion. Such adjustment is specific only for certain cell adhesion molecules (CAMs), because labeling for SynCAM is unchanged. Together, our findings demonstrate unequivocally that β1‐integrin is an integral synaptic adhesion protein, and suggest that adhesive function at the synapse reflects a cooperative and dynamic network of multiple CAM families. J. Comp. Neurol. 520:2041–;2052, 2012. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cne.23027

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 51

  1. 10.1073/pnas.141215898 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/0306-4522(95)00350-R · DOI
  3. 10.1002/cne.21895 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Benson DL, 2011, Building and remodeling synapses, Hippocampus
  5. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2005.03062.x · DOI
  6. 10.1002/cne.1201 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.ygeno.2005.08.017 · DOI
  8. 10.1126/science.1072356 · DOI
  9. 10.1126/science.154.3756.1575 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/S0022-5320(68)90027-0 · DOI
  11. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1223-10.2010 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1083/jcb.110.4.1387 · DOI
  13. Chan C‐S, 2008, Molecular mechanisms of memory, 721
  14. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-18-07107.2003 · DOI
  15. 10.1101/lm.648607 · DOI
  16. 10.1038/nature09667 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/S0306-4522(01)00173-7 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1074/jbc.M307051200 · DOI
  19. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19960617)370:1<105::AID-CNE10>3.0.CO;2-R · DOI
  20. 10.1002/cne.20876 · DOI
  21. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2739-07.2007 · DOI
  22. Fujimoto K, 1995, Freeze‐fracture replica electron microscopy combined with SDS digestion for cytochemical labeling of integral membrane proteins. Application to the immunogold labeling of intercellular junctional complexes, J Cell Sci, 108, 3443, 10.1242/jcs.108.11.3443 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.cell.2004.11.035 · DOI
  24. 10.1038/nrc727 · DOI
  25. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3526-06.2006 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1016/S0306-4522(01)00540-1 · DOI
  27. 10.1073/pnas.0601354103 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1016/S0306-4522(98)00298-X · DOI
  29. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4283-04.2005 · DOI
  30. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.1996.tb01611.x · DOI
  31. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2861-06.2007 · DOI
  32. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4359-05.2006 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1016/j.mcn.2005.03.013 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1016/S0022-5320(71)90007-4 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/S0022-5320(71)80005-9 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00450-0 · DOI
  37. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-05-01541.1999 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-07-02512.2000 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1007/s11068-005-8360-2 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.11.003 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/0306-4522(86)90121-1 · DOI
  42. 10.1073/pnas.96.3.1100 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Takada Y, 1993, Identification of a regulatory region of beta 1 subunit using activating and inhibiting antibodies, J Biol Chem, 268, 17597, 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)85374-7 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80874-0 · DOI
  45. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0032-07.2007 · DOI
  46. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6160-08.2009 · DOI
  47. 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)61773-7 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.09.003 · DOI
  49. 10.1074/jbc.271.6.3046 · DOI
  50. Yamagata M, 1995, Lamina‐specific expression of adhesion molecules in developing chick optic tectum, J Neurosci, 15, 4556, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-06-04556.1995 · DOI
  51. 10.1038/ncb0807-858 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Mortillo, S., Elste, A., Ge, Y., Patil, S. B., Hsiao, K., Huntley, G. W., Davis, R. L., & Benson, D. L.
Venue
Journal of Comparative Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-04-08
Volume
520
Issue
9
Pages
2041-2052
ISSN
  • 0021-9967
  • 1096-9861
Cited by
52
References
5
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review