The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Distribution of the SynDIG4/proline-rich transmembrane protein 1 in rat brain
Abstract
The modulation of AMPA receptor (AMPAR) content at synapses is thought to be an underlying molecular mechanism of memory and learning. AMPAR content at synapses is highly plastic and is regulated by numerous AMPAR accessory transmembrane proteins such as TARPs, cornichons, and CKAMPs. SynDIG (synapse differentiation‐induced gene) defines a family of four genes (SynDIG1–4) expressed in distinct and overlapping patterns in the brain. SynDIG1 was previously identified as a novel transmembrane AMPAR‐associated protein that regulates synaptic strength. The related protein SynDIG4 [also known as Prrt1 (proline‐rich transmembrane protein 1)] has recently been identified as a component of AMPAR complexes. In this study, we show that SynDIG1 and SynDIG4 have distinct yet overlapping patterns of expression in the central nervous system, with SynDIG4 having especially prominent expression in the hippocampus and particularly within CA1. In contrast to SynDIG1 and other traditional AMPAR auxiliary subunits, SynDIG4 is de‐enriched at the postsynaptic density and colocalizes with extrasynaptic GluA1 puncta in primary dissociated neuron culture. These results indicate that, although SynDIG4 shares sequence similarity with SynDIG1, it might act through a unique mechanism as an auxiliary factor for extrasynaptic GluA1‐containing AMPARs. J. Comp. Neurol. 524:2266–2280, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
SynDIG4 overlaps primarily with extrasynaptic AMPARs and localizes to early and recycling endosomes.
“SynDIG4 overlaps primarily with extrasynaptic AMPARs (Kirk et al., 2016) and localizes to early and recycling endosomes (Martin et al., 2021).”
From Loss of SynDIG4/PRRT1 alters distribution of AMPA receptors in Rab4- and Rab11-positive endosomes and impairs basal AMPA receptor recycling (2025) · cites this paper as Kirk et al., 2016
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Homeostatic Synaptic Plasticity: Local and Global Mechanisms for Stabilizing Neuronal Function
Turrigiano, G. (2012) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a005736 · Cited by 1,139 · cited 1×
“…at synapses, as well as their subunit composition, is highly dynamic, and the regulation at synapses is implicated in several types of plasticity such as longterm potentiation (LTP; for review see Huganir and Nicoll, 2013) and synaptic scaling (for review see Turrigiano, 2012; Lee et al., 2014).”
BackgroundStargazin regulates synaptic targeting of AMPA receptors by two distinct mechanisms
Chen, L., Chetkovich, D. M., Petralia, R. S., Sweeney, N. T., Kawasaki, Y., Wenthold, R. J., Bredt, D. S., & Nicoll, R. A. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35050030 · Cited by 1,111
Subunit-specific temporal and spatial patterns of AMPA receptor exocytosis in hippocampal neurons
Passafaro, M., Piëch, V., & Sheng, M. (2001) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn0901-917 · Cited by 655
LTP requires a reserve pool of glutamate receptors independent of subunit type
Granger, A. J., Shi, Y., Lu, W., Cerpas, M., & Nicoll, R. A. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11775 · Cited by 313
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 38
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0325-07.2007 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.045575 · DOI
- 10.1016/0028-3908(96)00128-1 · DOI
- 10.1124/mi.10.5.5 · DOI
- Chen N, 2014, Interaction proteomics reveals brain region‐specific AMPA receptor complexes, J Proteome Res
- 10.1074/jbc.M803431200 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07357.x · DOI
- 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)01016-4 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.12.036 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-540-72843-6_17 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tins.2007.11.010 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0910338106 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1152089 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.10.025 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4048-09.2009 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.04.007 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1006/jmbi.2001.5008 · DOI
- 10.1074/mcp.M400045-MCP200 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.12.021 · DOI
- 10.1096/fasebj.14.2.231 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2013.03.016 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0066171 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.02.027 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.112830 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nn1678 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2728-06.2006 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.1167852 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.03.034 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.08.044 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.11.029 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.celrep.2012.05.004 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.1011706107 · DOI
- 10.1002/pro.256 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.celrep.2012.02.004 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.12.042 · DOI
- 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90218-1 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1184178 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.284.5421.1805 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
He, C.-W., & Díaz, E. (2025) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2025.1568908 · Cited by 3
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kirk, L. M., Ti, S. W., Bishop, H. I., Orozco‐Llamas, M., Pham, M., Trimmer, J. S., & Díaz, E.
- Affiliations
- Department of Pharmacology University of California Davis School of Medicine Davis California 95616
- Department of Neurobiology Physiology and Behavior, University of California Davis California 95616
- Venue
- Journal of Comparative Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-12-29
- Volume
- 524
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2266-2280
- ISSN
- 0021-9967
- 1096-9861
- PMC
- PMC4892943
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 4
- Language
- en
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health Director's New Innovator Award Program (DP2 OD006479-01)
- National Science Foundation (1322302)
- National Institutes of Health (#R01 NS042225, T32 GM007377)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review