Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 423

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Medullary and spinal efferents of the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus and adjacent mesopontine tegmentum in the rat

Rye, David B., Lee, Henry J., Saper, Clifford B., Wainer, Bruce H.·1988·Journal of Comparative Neurology

Abstract

The medullary and spinal efferents of the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus and adjacent mesopontine tegmentum were investigated by employing (1) the anterograde autoradiographic methodology and (2) the retrograde transport of HRP and/or WGA‐HRP in combination with choline acetyltransferase immunohistochemistry. The anterograde experiments identified five descending pathways from the mesopontine tegmentum: (1) Probst's tract, which descends in the dorsolateral reticular formation in close relation to the nucleus of the solitary tract; (2) a ventrolateral branch of Probst's tract that extends ventrolaterally alongside the spinal trigeminal nucleus; (3) a ventromedial branch of Probst's tract that extends ventromedially through the gigantocellular field of the medulla; (4) the medial reticulospinal tract, which descends in parallel with the medial longitudinal fasciculus and turns ventrolaterally along the dorsal surface of the inferior olive to enter the ventrolateral funiculus of the spinal cord; and (5) a crossed ventromedial pathway, which descends in a ventral paramedian position through the magnocellular field of the medulla. The origins of these pathways reflected a rough lateral‐to‐medial topography of mesopontine tegmental cell groups. The parabrachial nucleus, situated furthest laterally, for example, projected primarily through Probst's tract and its ventrolateral branch. The pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus, midbrain extrapyramidal area, and the subceruleal region, situated more medially, projected descending axons largely through the ventromedial branch of Probst's tract. The pontine tegmental field, situated furthest medially and ventromedially, was the largest contributor to the medial reticulospinal tract. The retrograde transport experiments confirmed these general organizational features. The combination of retrograde transport with choline acetyltransferase immunohistochemistry established that the cholinergic pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus contributes a large portion to the mesopontine tegmental innervation of the medullary reticular formation. A much smaller number of cholinergic pedunculopontine neurons project as far as the spinal cord. Spinal projections from the mesopontine tegmentum originate largely from non‐cholinergic neurons of the midbrain extrapyramidal area, subceruleal region, Kölliker‐Fuse division of the parabrachial nucleus, and pontine tegmental field.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cne.902690302

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Rye, D. B., Lee, H. J., Saper, C. B., & Wainer, B. H.
Venue
Journal of Comparative Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1988-03-15
Volume
269
Issue
3
Pages
315-341
ISSN
  • 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9861
OpenAlex
W2056424357
Cited by
423
References
1
FWCI
6.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.